Here's what Paul said:
But if thy brother be grieved with thy meat, now walkest thou not charitably. Destroy not him with thy meat, for whom Christ died.
Let me paraphrase:
If your brother is offended by your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not use your food to kill him for whom Christ died.
Love is a pretty tall order, ain't it.
The
REAL POINT of my first post was to ask this question (since apparently some failed to grasp it the first time [My fault I guess for not making it {to borrow a phrase from the late RM Nixon} "perfectly clear"!!]):
OK, so you won't eat ANY food because "your brother is offended by it and thus, your 'love for him' forces you to do so."
FINE. What I was asking was simply to
what extent does one take his/her decision not to eat ANY food??
Case in point, soon after I was saved (some 46+ yrs ago by now), a "brother in the Lord" that I happened to come across while stationed at Davis-Monthan AFB (located adjecent to Tucson, AZ) was offended by my eating a hamburger at the base's chow hall because he firmly held to the idea that eating ANY kind of "red meat" was some how anti-Scriptural for
ALL Christians.
OK, so I stopped eating hamburgers.
When the overseas orders levy came down, this "brother in the Lord" received orders to be stationed in Japan, and I received orders to be stationed in what was then called "West" Germany.
Guess what was on the menu on a Saturday night over there in "West" Germany before Monday's pay checks would arrive?
Yep, HAMBURGER!!
I was
sure hungry that Saturday night and REALLY licked my chops as a fellow (whom I didn't know) sat down next to me with a double cheeseburger on his plate!!
BUT, a "promise is a promise," so as not to break my promise to this "brother in the Lord" who was now stationed in Japan and me over in "West" Germany, so all I ate was the stale bread that was left on the serving line and a glass of H20.
SO, AGAIN, could I, in GOOD FAITH, have eaten one of those double cheeseburgers or not??
Please provide
very specific NT book(s), chapter(s) and verse(s) to support whatever position you have when answering what I consider to be a very legitimate question.
NOW, is
that clear enough for you folks out there in BB land?