Richard Nixon actually ran on a platform of stopping the Viet Nam war in 1968. I cast my first presidential vote for him because of that stance. In 1972, it was clear that he lied to get votes and I voted against him. What's the difference between that and Republicans holding out the promise of stopping abortion and then doing almost nothing to achieve that? I wasn't hoodwinked to vote for Nixon the second time because I thought he would end the war. The Christian Right has been hoodwinked into thinking that Republicans would end legal abortion.
Your posts are pathetic. You have no more knowledge of history, government, or politics than a hat rack. Richard Nixon did not run in 1968 on a platform of stopping the war in Vietnam in a certain time period. Below is the Republican platform from 1968.
Vietnam
The Administration's Vietnam policy has failed—militarily, politically, diplomatically, and with relation to our own people.
We condemn the Administration's breach of faith with the American people respecting our heavy involvement in Vietnam. Every citizen bitterly recalls the Democrat campaign oratory of 1964: "We are not about to send American boys 9-10,000 miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves." The Administration's failure to honor its own words has led millions of Americans to question its credibility.
The entire nation has been profoundly concerned by hastily extemporized, undeclared land wars which embroil massive U.S. armed forces thousands of miles from our shores. It is time to realize that not every international conflict is susceptible of solution by American ground forces.
Militarily, the Administration's piecemeal commitment of men and material has wasted our massive military superiority and frittered away our options. The result has been a prolonged war of attrition. Throughout this period the Administration has been slow in training and equipping South Vietnamese units both for fighting the war and for defending their country after the war is over.
Politically, the Administration has failed to recognize the entirely novel aspects of this war. The overemphasis on its old-style, conventional aspects has blinded the Administration to the fact that the issue is not control of territory but the security and loyalty of the population. The enemy's primary emphasis has been to disrupt orderly government.
The Administration has paid inadequate attention to the political framework on which a successful outcome ultimately depends. Not only has the Administration failed to encourage assumption of responsibility by the Vietnamese, but their sense of responsibility has been in fact undermined by our approach to pacification. An added factor has been a lack of security for the civilian population.
At home, the Administration has failed to share with the people the full implication of our challenge and of our commitments.
To resolve our Vietnam dilemma, America obviously requires new leadership—one capable of thinking and acting anew, not one hostage to the many mistakes of the past. The Republican Party offers such leadership.
We pledge to adopt a strategy relevant to the real problems of the war, concentrating on the security of the population, on developing a greater sense of nation-hood, and on strengthening the local forces. It will be a strategy permitting a progressive de-Americanization of the war, both military and civilian.
We will see to it that our gallant American servicemen are fully supported with the highest quality equipment, and will avoid actions that unnecessarily jeopardize their lives.
We will pursue a course that will enable and induce the South Vietnamese to assume increasing responsibility.
The war has been conducted without a coherent program for peace.
We pledge a program for peace in Vietnam—neither peace at any price nor a camouflaged surrender of legitimate United States or allied interests—but a positive program that will offer a fair and equitable settlement to all, based on the principle of self-determination, our national interests and the cause of long-range world peace.
We will sincerely and vigorously pursue peace negotiations as long as they offer any reasonable prospect for a just peace, We pledge to develop a clear and purposeful negotiating position.
We will return to one of the cardinal principles of the last Republican Administration: that American interests are best served by cooperative multilateral action with our allies rather than by unilateral U.S. action.
Our pride in the nation's armed forces in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the world is beyond expression.
In all our history none have fought more bravely or more devotedly than our sons in this unwanted war in Vietnam.
They deserve—and they and their loved ones have—our total support, our encouragement, and our prayers.
Nixon promised new leadership to bring the war to an end with honor, not the quit and surrender idea that you would follow.
By the way, since you brought up Vietnam, what did you do to help the nation through that period? What have you ever done to serve this nation? My guess is nothing. You sat around and talked a lot. Richard Nixon made mistakes, but he did improve the situation immensely from Johnson.
I think you are one of these people who define patriotism by shooting off firecrackers, and your mouth, and wave a flag, but never lifted one finger to serve.
