Link said:
I wrote,
>Apostle, elder/overseer, and 'brethren' are the roles that have to do with church government. Apostle, elder, deacon, and brethren deal with administative issues <
Those passages do not say that these are the only 'offices.' It happens to deal with two church roles, but not mention all the rest. I read that in KJV English 'office' mean 'role' such as 'the office of the tongue is to speak.' The word 'office' or a word with the same meaning does not show up in the Greek, I have read.
'Apostles' are mentioned far more many times than elders in New Testament scripture. In Acts, we see that they played a role in church government for a time until deacons and elders developed in the congregation.
Paul preached the Gospel and had a role of spiritual authority in the churches he planted, and appointed elders. How can one say this was not a church government role in scripture?
I suppose the problem is that apostles do not seem to belong to any one local church. So you could say they are not officers of the local church. They are involved in 'the work' and the work produces churches. They had a 'measure of rule in churches started through their ministry.
1. If we read 1 Tim 3:1-2, there is a distinction between Office of Episkope and Episkopos
Episkopes (Επισκοπησ) in verse 1 means the Office of Overseer or which may be called Overseer-ship. a Female Noun
Episkopos (Επισκοποσ) in verse 2 means "an Overseer" a Male Noun.
There is no word for Office, but it is expressed by the conjugation or surfix of words.
2. Peter was an Apostle apppointed by Lord Jesus, but calls himself as an Elder ( 1 Pet 5:1) whose function was to sheperd ( ποιμανατε : verse 2 of the same chapter)
3. John was an Apostle too but calls himself as an Elder ( 3 John 1, 2 John 1)
4. Philip was a Deacon but also called as an Evangelist ( Acts 21:8) and worked as such in chap 8.
5. Stephen was a Deacon but I believe he was a great teacher and Prophet performing miracles ( Acts 6 : 8)
6. Elders existed since the time of Moses ( Ex 24:1)
Elders existed at the time of Jesus too and 24 elders were among the Sanhedrin members.
Elders and Deacons are another criteria different from the issues of Apostles, Teachers, Pastors etc.
If Pastors (Shepherds), Evangelists, Teachers, Prophets are the offices, then what are the qualifications required for such positions?
Why there is no mentioning about how to select such pastors, evangelists in the Bible?
As for the Apostles, they were selected and chosen by the Lord and existed only at the time of Early Church. They had seen the Lord in person and sent by the Lord.
Agabus was a Prophet ( Acts 21:10) but what was the requirement for such office? There is no mentioning about it.
Why do the churches have the Title Pastor whose qualification is not mentioned at all in the Bible and have them rule over the Deacons and Elders whose qualifications are clearly mentioned in the Bible?
Moreover the colleges of Theology ordain the Pastors even though they don't have the qualifications as the deacons in 1 Tim 3:8-13 or the Episkope in 1 tim 3:1-7, while no Elder can preach the gospels on the Pulpit unless they are graduated from the college of theology even though they are fully qualified according to 1 Tim 3:1-7. This is the tragedy of today's churches.
Normally the more important positions are mentioned in the Law or in the Constitutional Law, and they exercise the power over the positions which are not mentioned in the Law. If the qualification of pastors are not mentioned in the Bible, they are less important than the Deacons. The reality is paradox to the Bible.
Therefore we must distinguish between Office and Gifts.
I sometimes disagree with my own church - so called Plymouth Brethren, but as far as this kind of NT church organization matters, so-called PB made the excellent discernment, I believe.