• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

churches eliminating "Baptist" from name...

Status
Not open for further replies.

mandym

New Member
Yep.


Yep, that would be an evil motive.

However, if Baptists in your region have gained a bad reputation (and your congregation has had nothing to do with it) or are greatly misunderstood, then it might be appropriate to change your name to remove potential misunderstandings/obstacles to those who might benefit from your fellowship.

So how is one motive any different than the other? I don't get it. Are people not going to Baptist churches just because the name is on the sign or because they are in fact Baptist? Is it the name on the sign or actually being Baptist? Does the church being Baptist change because the sign no longer reads Baptist? If not then isn't the church being Baptist and holding to doctrines and philosophies typical to Baptist churches the real thing people are wanting to avoid rather than just what is on the sign out front?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If someone does not want to go to a "Baptist" church and a church removes "Baptist" (hiding who they are)so those people will visit anyway is that honest?

Because it's the name and not the true Baptist doctrine that they are against. Take that same church with the same beliefs and make it a Community church and people will now step in the door and embrace the doctrine. It's weird to me.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Regarding denials that that famous church in London identifies themselves as a "Baptist Church", take a look at this big sign outside their building:

Google Images
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So how is one motive any different than the other? I don't get it.
One motive (like you described) is to be dishonest. The other motive (like I described) is to remove obstacles/impediments to a potential relationship with the unchurched.

Please note the conditions I outlined:

IF

- “Baptist” = bad reputation or is greatly misunderstood (as in some parts of the U.S. and the world)

AND

- Your congregation has nothing to do with earning that bad reputation or is nothing like the popular stereotype within the local culture

THEN

- Not having “Baptist” is your church’s name is not deceptive.
 

mandym

New Member
One motive (like you described) is to be dishonest. The other motive (like I described) is to remove obstacles/impediments to a potential relationship with the unchurched.

Please note the conditions I outlined:

IF

- “Baptist” = bad reputation or is greatly misunderstood (as in some parts of the U.S. and the world)

AND

- Your congregation has nothing to do with earning that bad reputation or is nothing like the popular stereotype within the local culture

THEN

- Not having “Baptist” is your church’s name is not deceptive.

Whether or not a church is as perceived is irrelevant. If someone does not want to go to a Baptist church and the name is removed to get them to come anyway. That is not honest. The key problem here is people do not want to go to a Baptist church. And rather than be up front about who we are and build relationships to change wrong perceptions we remove Baptist to fool them about who we are. It lacks transparency and honesty.
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It isn't being deceptive. Anyone involved in our covenant membership process knows we support the Cooperative Program. We have chosen, because of missiological reasons to simply be XYZ Church.

You know the use of denominational monikers has only been popular for about two centuries. Considering that Christian churches have been around for nearly 2000 years that isn't a necessary condition.

I guess it really depends on who you are trying to reach. Like I said above we have yet to receive a complaint from anyone who is unchurched or dechurched who attends our fellowship.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Whether or not a church is as perceived is irrelevant.
How in the world is that irrelevant?

If someone does not want to go to a Baptist church and the name is removed to get them to come anyway. That is not honest.
The name is removed to avoid incorrect first impressions.

The key problem here is people do not want to go to a Baptist church.
Not necessarily. In my experience, we have had people visit our church yet decide that "Baptists" were not for them when they saw Westboro "Baptist"(sic) Church(sic) doing their thing on television, or when a Baptist "leader" said or did something that was not in line with what our church believed and taught. (And yes, our church has "Baptist" in the name.)

And rather than be up front about who we are and build relationships to change wrong perceptions we remove Baptist to fool them about who we are. It lacks transparency and honesty.
You are assigning bad motives and assuming certain actions which are not in evidence.

Of the Baptist churches I have seen who do not have Baptist in the name, I have seem no effort to "fool" people (many of them post the Baptist Faith and Message as their doctrinal statement right on the Web site) and I've never known an individual from those congregations who has tried to be deceptive about their convictions.

For the sake of argument, I could assign bad motives and assume certain actions which would cast churches that use the word "Baptist" in their name in a bad light, but that's just making stuff up.

You don't have to agree (or like it), but you need to be fair.

For the record, I stated at the very beginning of this discussion that I don't like the trend, but I understand it.
 

mandym

New Member
Of the Baptist churches I have seen who do not have Baptist in the name, I have seem no effort to "fool" people (many of them post the Baptist Faith and Message as their doctrinal statement right on the Web site) and I've never known an individual from those congregations who has tried to be deceptive about their convictions.

It is easy to say we are removing a barrier by taking baptist off the sign, but in doing so we are misleading those who do not want to go to a Baptist church about who we are if we are removing Baptist to get them to come in. Regardless of what one thinks is their motive it is "fooling" them is what is going on. It lacks transparency and forthrightness that Christians should be known for.

I suggest that we get out into the community and show them who we are by building relationships. Rather than marketing techniques. The church has become business like because it wants to not because it needs to. And it leads to thought processes that are not an example of Christian integrity.

I am grieved to have to disagree so strongly. I do not do it lightly. I do not believe there is any malicious intentions. I do pray that God blesses all your ministries.
 

JohnDeereFan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Earlier today I found out that a church I used to attend...Morningside Baptist Church...is changing their name to Morningside *Community" Church.

This seems to be a trend these days, and I dont care for it.

Are they ashamed of the name "Baptist"?

Is it a "marketing" thing? They think it will bring more people in?

I thought it was God who brought people in?


I just dont like this trend. Why not be up front about being a baptist church???

Many years ago, I was a part of a great church. We tried to change our name and the issue of whether or not to keep "Baptist" in the title almost tore the church apart.

I've never understood the point of hiding who we are. Who are we trying to impress? Do we now base our identity on a marketing strategy? Or do we do church for the Body of Christ?

I also don't understand the point of eliminating the name "Baptist" if you're going to keep Baptist beliefs and practices.

There are Baptist churches that have dancing girls for some reason. A member of one such church is a frequent poster here. Dancing girls, rock bands, lying about who we are...I think we need to decide whether or not our mission is to entertain goats or feed sheep.
 

Bob Alkire

New Member
I suggested "Island Community Church" but it seems "Christian Church" was the one that won out. So that's what we are - Island Christian Church.

If I were passing by, I would think you were a Christian Church, one of the churches that came from Alexander Campbell's teaching such as Church of Christ or Disciples of Christ. When I'm passing through a town I look for a Baptist Church first.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is easy to say we are removing a barrier by taking baptist off the sign, but in doing so we are misleading those who do not want to go to a Baptist church about who we are if we are removing Baptist to get them to come in. Regardless of what one thinks is their motive it is "fooling" them is what is going on. It lacks transparency and forthrightness that Christians should be known for.

I suggest that we get out into the community and show them who we are by building relationships. Rather than marketing techniques. The church has become business like because it wants to not because it needs to. And it leads to thought processes that are not an example of Christian integrity.

I am grieved to have to disagree so strongly. I do not do it lightly. I do not believe there is any malicious intentions. I do pray that God blesses all your ministries.

If for some reason I didn't want to go to a Baptist church because of their doctrine, there are a LOT of churches I'd avoid. Around here they would be all sorts of names, not just Baptist. I'd avoid the Community churches, the Christian churches and a bunch of other names as well. I'd research their doctrine before I went to see if it's a church that I would want to go to or not. If they were baptistic in their doctrine (Biblical, IMO), then I'd not go if that was the issue I had. It has nothing to do with the name although having "Baptist" in the name would just make my research easier.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If I were passing by, I would think you were a Christian Church, one of the churches that came from Alexander Campbell's teaching such as Church of Christ or Disciples of Christ. When I'm passing through a town I look for a Baptist Church first.

I'm not sure that we have those around here. We have a number of "Christian" churches which are non-denominational.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, if one Googles

Long Island "Island Christian Church"

the first result is

Upper Room Christian World Center - Long Island Christian Church

We are a non-denominational, family oriented church located in Long Island

But click on its service webcast, and you will soon hear the preacher proclaim:

I am a Pentecostal Fundamentalist! That means that I believe in speaking in tongues, dancing in the Spirit, prophesying, all the gifts of the Spirit, raising the dead, healing the sick, casting out devils, uh, the glory of God, the higher levels, the lower levels, the upper levels, the Deeper Life, all of them!
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It is easy to say we are removing a barrier by taking baptist off the sign, but in doing so we are misleading those who do not want to go to a Baptist church about who we are if we are removing Baptist to get them to come in.
I still don’t think you get the point I’ve been trying to make.

Most people (including Baptists) don’t really know their Baptist distinctives very well. All they know is what they see on television or hear other people say. And unfortunately, most of the Baptists who get television coverage are not talking about Baptist distinctives, but are usually presenting some sort of political position, getting arrested, or the Westboro cult acting like anything but Christians.

So I don’t think the name “Baptist” is a helpful descriptor to unchurched people. To people who are involved in church life already, they will know enough to check into things and do some research on the Web.

Regardless of what one thinks is their motive it is "fooling" them is what is going on. It lacks transparency and forthrightness that Christians should be known for.
Thinking about it, there are some small communities I know in West Texas that only have one church, and it happens to be Baptist. Yet, for the better part of a century the single church in the community has just been named [Name of Community] Church. Do you think they are somehow being dishonest because they don’t spell everything out on the sign?

If you are a hyper-Calvinist, should you put “You May Be Damned For All Eternity and Can’t Do A Thing About It Family Church” on the sign?

What about holding to traditional Baptist beliefs regarding baptism – “Your Infant Baptism Is Meaningless Fellowship Church”?

Is that really the best way to approach the unchurched?

Shouldn’t they get to know the beliefs of a congregation in some sort of context before they make a judgment?

I suggest that we get out into the community and show them who we are by building relationships.
You’re assuming the hypothetical church in question is trying to do building-centered evangelism, and that’s ridiculous.

Every church I’ve known that is essentially Baptist but does not use the word “Baptist” in the formal name is very active building relationships in the community. By not using the name Baptist they are actually avoiding some of the traditional Baptist “church-hoppers” who move back and forth between congregations following charismatic ministers or popular programs, so they are more focused on the unchurched.

Even the church where I am a member which does identify as Baptist in the name relies on relationship building and working in the community to draw people in.

Rather than marketing techniques.
Hate to break it to you, but building relationships is the essence of marketing. (I earn my living in marketing for a professional firm, so I know that of which I speak.) It is a very positive type of marketing motivated by love (like Jesus), but marketing nonetheless.

I know you’re trying to make marketing a dirty word, but it’s not. It’s a neutral term and can be perfect, completely evil or many things in between.
The church has become business like because it wants to not because it needs to. And it leads to thought processes that are not an example of Christian integrity.
You’re the one ascribing evil motives and actions to everything… you are insisting that others have evil motives and then declaring them evil because of their thought processes. That’s circular logic with a holier-than-thou halo scotch-taped to it.

I am grieved to have to disagree so strongly. I do not do it lightly.
Believe me, a few years ago I would have been right beside you arguing the same thing. However my eyes have been opened recently to some of these issues and I see that they are not as simple as I thought they were.

I do not believe there is any malicious intentions.
I believe you, although you certainly are ascribing bad motives to the hypothetical congregation we’ve been talking about! :D

I do pray that God blesses all your ministries.
And yours as well. There is room for “Baptist”-named ministries as well as regular Baptist ministries.
 

TomVols

New Member
Some of the great churches - pastored by some of the giants in the faith - did not have a denominational name. Spurgeon's church did not. Lloyd-Jones's church did not. I could go on. You get the point.

I agree that far too many have the denom title on the door but not in their doctrine. Most Baptists now have no clue what it means to be such.

On the other hand, most people I know are wary of churches not having a denom title - but these are folks in my generation. Those in their 20s and 30s seem not to care so much. Shepherds have been leading their flocks away from doctrinal understanding of their denominational ties, and culture has sold (and we have bought) the notion that divisions are bad. So we tear away monikers or names that sound divisive.

I'm not torn up either way. I know I saw one study years ago that said that only a couple of the 100 fastest growing churches in America did NOT have a denominational name in the title, so punting the denomination's name from your sign isn't going to guarantee growth. I'd be curious to see the numbers now.
 

TomVols

New Member
There are so many different kinds of churches with the name "Baptist" in them that it is hardly an identifying name anymore.
So true. And it's equally true for Methodists and others. You can visit Southern Baptist churches within eyeshot of each other in my suburb. One SBC church sings contemporary songs, the pastor uses a modern version of the Bible, and dress is business casual to business wear. The other church is KJVOnly, sings only songs from one certain hymnal, and women in pants are not considered appropriately dressed, though the pastor prefers not to wear a tie in order to look "educated."
 

TomVols

New Member
Corporate Name Changes;

Brad's Drink, changed to Pepsi Cola in 1893

Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo K.K., changed to Sony

United Telephone, Centel, Central Telephone, Carolina Telephone, changed to Sprint

Jerry's Guide to the World Wide Web, went to Yahoo!

BackRub, changed to Google, 1998

Airtran Airways, changed to Valuejet Airlines

Quantum Computer Services, changed to AOL

Business reasons for all the above changes. Marketing.
Not always true. Sometimes names must be changed due to legal reasons, holding company status, etc. It's not always apples to apples.

I'm no church marketing guru. I don't believe churches should replace the gospel with marketing. That said, I think churches should do anything short of sinning to get the gospel in front of as many people as possible. You can do that without following Madison Ave type activities (Hyles' church comes to mind as a great example NOT to follow).
 

Alive in Christ

New Member
I also don't understand the point of eliminating the name "Baptist" if you're going to keep Baptist beliefs and practices.

There are Baptist churches that have dancing girls for some reason. A member of one such church is a frequent poster here.

Uh oh.

The fur might fly before long...:laugh:
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter

The Upper Room is a VERY charasmatic church. NOT one of ours. LOL We're the third entry.

ETA: And the fourth and the fifth is our home church. :)

ETA Again: The sixth one is our third campus that will open on Palm Sunday and the seventh one is our Facebook page. Let's see if there are more....yep - the fifth entry on page two is our church as well. We have pretty good coverage. Not sure why Upper Room even comes up since "Christian church" is not part of their name. They must pay a service to get them up on google. Our results are because of my good web page labeling. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top