• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Churchill and WWI

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In the book, the Last Lion, Winston's efforts before and during WWI are presented. Prior to the war, circa 1911, he was made "First Lord of the Admiralty." He set about modernizing the British Navy, going from 13.5 inch main guns to longer range 15 inch guns. He turned away from coal powered ships, and set about building oil fired ships. And he went for building faster ships. When challenged, he explains why. He said it was because of Mrs. Bright's* recipe for Hares Soup. He said the first thing listed was "First you catch the Hare..."

*I do not remember the actual name Winston used, so I made up the one I used above.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
Have you read "Dreadnaught"? It's an account of Churchill's collaboration with John Fisher, First Sea Lord, to re-create the Royal Navy (which ended with the disaster at Gallipoli).
 
Last edited:

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Have you read "Dreadnaught"? It's an account of Churchill's collaboration with John Fisher, First Sea Lord, to re-create the Royal Navy (which ended with the disaster at Gallipoli).
Nope, but your encapsulation differs from the account provided in the Last Lion which said the government paper looking into Gallipoli completely absolved Winston of any flawed contribution.
 

rsr

<b> 7,000 posts club</b>
Moderator
My account says nothing about blame. It is a fact that Fisher took the fall for the fiasco and Churchill was soon thereafter forced out of the Admiralty.

It is true that Churchill was not responsible for the disastrous Gallipoli campaign, but it also is true that the attempt to run the Dardanelles and destroy the onshore batteries was an ill-considered move with (in hindsight) little chance of success given the superior firepower of the Krupp cannon the British and French navies faced.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
My account says nothing about blame. It is a fact that Fisher took the fall for the fiasco and Churchill was soon thereafter forced out of the Admiralty.

It is true that Churchill was not responsible for the disastrous Gallipoli campaign, but it also is true that the attempt to run the Dardanelles and destroy the onshore batteries was an ill-considered move with (in hindsight) little chance of success given the superior firepower of the Krupp cannon the British and French navies faced.
Many disagree, including me.

It is not that WSC had eyes that could see farther than everyone else, but had the curiosity and humility to learn from others, such that he stood on their shoulders; but also that he learned from his experience, such that he lifted himself even higher by the means of being self-taught, such that he could see farther.
 
Last edited:

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In a bureaucracy it is hard for visionaries to protect the organization from its management. In WWI Churchill's subordinates, colleagues and boss all betrayed him. (Fisher, K of K, and the PM)
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Today we seem to need hypersonic weapons to catch the hypersonic hare...
 
Top