T
TexasSky
Guest
Okay - Christ said to give unto Ceasar that which was Ceasar's and to God that which was God's.
What IS God's?
What IS God's?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't care who argues it and how often. I'm going to continue to tithe. That is, I'm going to continue to give 10% of my income. Whenever possible, I will give more. I do so out of respect and gratitude for the Lord. If someone wants to accuse me of legalism, or any other kind of ism, they're welcome to. But I'm not going to stop tithing. I'll tithe until I die. If I'm wrong in doing so, I'm not any worse off for it.Originally posted by Soulman:
It seems like it's time to clarify the issue of tithing vs. giving again.
This is what we mean by church "tithing" being man-made.Preachers are mixing O.T. law with false doctrine.I am being careful to choose my words here. I say false doctrine because they are twisting the scriptures to say what they do not.
Although I would still argue that the "tithing" here is misunderstood, I would agree that encouraging a consistent giving scheme is a good idea. Commanding it is not Scriptural.Abraham gave a tithe to Melchizedek(Gen. 14:18-20) and this was before the law or Moses, so God doesn't mind a church encouraging members to tithe to further His kingdom.
Once again, I never say that everyone who "tithes" is wrong. It is a good thing to give 10% or any amount cheefully. What I am always saying is that it is wrong to say that Christians are required to give 10% of their incomes to a local church for the simple reason that it cannot be Scripturally supported. To doctrinally command anything that is not Scripture is legalism.Yes, there are some that abuse the tithe and try to scare people into giving, but to say that everyone who tithes is wrong is absurd.
If the motive is indeed obedience to a supposed command, then yes, it could crumble. If it is actually cheerful giving, then there is no problem here.I would hate to think of what would happen at my church if people quit tithing. The ministry would crumble.
I guess this is good. I believe people should give to God cheerfully having no expectations receiving anything back. You could trust that God will meet all your needs, but you shouldn't expect that God will return to you the value (in money or otherwise) every cent that you give.People should give by faith, believing that God will bless their faithfulness.
This is true. And true of any method whereby we give cheerfully.I don't consider tithing to be a ritual of the law that I partake in. It is an opportunity to show God we love and trust Him.
You may want to be careful in using that statement to back up your argument. Nowhere does Christ speak against homosexuals either...or a number of other issues.To say that tithing in churches is unbiblical, is a little overboard because no where does Christ say not to do it.
I don't think we've been missing this. We have discussed this. Nevertheless, I will present it again. Here is the passage:One thing everyone is missing is that tithing predated the Law by about 400 years. Genesis 14 records the account of Abram and Melchizedek.
A few things can be learned from this passage:Genesis 14
16 And he brought back all the goods, and also brought again his brother Lot, and his goods, and the women also, and the people.
17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him, at the valley of Shaveh, which is the king's dale.
18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God.
19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth:
20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.
21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself.
22 And Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lift up mine hand unto the LORD, the most high God, the possessor of heaven and earth,
23 That I will not take from a thread even to a shoelatchet, and that I will not take any thing that is thine, lest thou shouldest say, I have made Abram rich:
24 Save only that which the young men have eaten, and the portion of the men which went with me, Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre; let them take their portion.
The tithe (of the Mosaic Law) was always of the increase of the harvest year by year. It was yearly because it was used for yearly activities. From what can be gathered in Deuteronomy 14, the first and second years it was for what I would call a "fiest of tithes." The household ate and shared their own tithe.I agree that the tithe was typically given of the flock or the heard or the grain. Today we don't generally deal in those commodities so we tithe the commodity we do have...money. I know in Romania, some still bring a tithe of the field. I have a friend that pastored in a small town in Louisiana where the people brought food they had grown as their tithe.
The third year, it was for what I would call a "heap tithe" where the tithe was laid outside the gates for public benefit. The third year was called the "year of tithing" (Deut. 26:12).24 And if the way be too long for thee, so that thou art not able to carry it; or if the place be too far from thee, which the LORD thy God shall choose to set his name there, when the LORD thy God hath blessed thee:
25 Then shalt thou turn it into money, and bind up the money in thine hand, and shalt go unto the place which the LORD thy God shall choose:
26 And thou shalt bestow that money for whatsoever thy soul lusteth after, for oxen, or for sheep, or for wine, or for strong drink, or for whatsoever thy soul desireth: and thou shalt eat there before the LORD thy God, and thou shalt rejoice, thou, and thine household,
So, the reason we should tithe is based on your logic:We should tithe. The reason most people don't tithe is because they waste their money on other things and they convince themselves they cannot afford to tithe. There are, of course, exceptions, but in my financial dealings with people (I teach a class on finances at my church), they don't tithe because they don't want to.
Of course, I think the 23% calculation is debatable. It's all a matter of how you interpret the different tithing passages, and determine whether they are referring to the same tithe used in different ways or to separate tithes. Of course, I would still say that tithing was never anywhere in the Bible based on one's income, but always on the yearly increase of one's harvest. There is a big difference.Statistics of professing Christians that do not tithe are staggering. Another thing is that people believe they are tithing if they give regularly. This is not true. The very nature of the tithe is 10%. As was mentioned above, under the Law, Jews were required to give up to about 23% of their income.
Tithing was a legal matter for the theocratic government of the nation of Israel. It was God's tax and welfare system for this nation, just as we have a (much more abused) tax and welfare system in our own countries.Tithing is not a financial matter, but a spiritual matter.
There is absolutely no comparison between the OT tithe and the taxes levied by civil governments. Tithing was not a civil duty, it was religious act, an act of worship like the giving in the NT Church. The Law of the Tithe is, infact, connected to the duty of Christians to contribute to the maintenance of their ministers (1 Cor. 9:13 & 14).Originally posted by AresMan:
It was God's tax and welfare system for this nation, just as we have a (much more abused) tax and welfare system in our own countries.
Interesting. I would think you would need a better basis for proving that the "tithe" is a NT institution other than a (1)one-time event (2)in the Old Testament, giving tithes of (3)the spoils of war (4)to a priest (the king of Salem), and (5)giving the rest to the king of Sodom, (6)while there is no other record of Abram giving tithes to anyone else, nor of tithing of his income. This somehow proves that the tithe is an institute for the New Testament church? Ok, let's all go out to war and fight with some other kings and get spoils and give a tenth of it to one king and nine-tenths of it to another king, depending on the level we need to spiritualize this passage.Argue all you want that the Tithe is not a NT institution, but you need a different basis for saying so.
The Law of the Tithe is, infact, connected to the duty of Christians to contribute to the maintenance of their ministers (1 Cor. 9:13 & 14).
Still from here there is no mention of tithes. Paul was an apostle and a missionary. He lived of whatever was given to him, such as the generous gifts from the Macedonian church. If tithing were an ordinance of the NT church you would think that there would be some reference of it in the NT that had nothing to do with Jewish law. You would think that there would be some reference that would indicate that the local church building is now the new Temple (wait, our bodies are the Temple of the Holy Ghost [I Cor. 6:9]). You would think that there would be some reference that would indicate that the bishops and elders have now become the new Levites, priests, and sons of Aaron (wait, aren't we as believers individual priests? [I Peter 2:9])I Cor. 9:13-14
13 Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?
14 Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.