Sapper Woody
Well-Known Member
Honestly, whether that gives him him more credibility or not (in my eyes) depends on how long he's been out. For military, the longer they've been out, the more out of touch they are with those who are in. With that being said, I mostly agree with him. At the very least I can say that he wasn't being unreasonable.Maybe it would be more credible coming from an ex cop?
This is probably the thing I disagree with most. An officer its still accountable for his actions. I would agree with that statement if it said he had to show that a reasonable person would have been in fear for his life.The former NYPD cop says 'Today the combination of an excess of deadly force and near-total lack of accountability is more dangerous than ever: Most cops today can pull out their weapons and fire without fear that anything will happen to them, even if they shoot someone wrongfully. All a police officer has to say is that he believes his life was in danger, and he’s typically absolved.
What he says here has some merit. I can see how some would start to get that mentality. I think that the officers should have access to that equipment, but not use it on a regular basis. I believe that's the way it is now.What do you think that does to their psychology as they patrol the streets—this sense of invulnerability? The famous old saying still applies: Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.'
He also dismisses the idea that police officers should use certain types of equipment while on the job.
'The automatic weapons and bulletproof vest may protect the officer, but they also insulate him from the very society he’s sworn to protect,' he asserts. 'All that firepower and armor puts an even greater wall between the police and society, and solidifies that "us-versus-them" feeling.'
I see nothing unreasonable here.At the end of his essay for POLITICO Magazine, Serpico offers a six-point solution, which he says includes police using better methods to find new police officers, offering 'examples-based training and simulations,' making sure cops understand their communities and are active in them, holding police accountable when they do something illegal, rewarding and recognizing honest police officers, and also making sure police are monitored externally.
I agree. But you don't gas your whole house because you saw one bug. You only have to do that if you let the problem get out of hand. At this stage, we see a couple of roaches. It's time to call terminex, and spray, but not to abandon the house.The size of the problem isn't the problem, the problem is that the problem exists. If a problem exists the time to solve it is before it becomes a big problem.
What does the number of police officers killed in the last few weeks have to do with this story?
I was letting people know why the police are quick to shoot when there's the appearance of a weapon.
My personal opinion on this story is that the officer involved should not be prosecuted, but should lose his badge. While I believe he was legally within hits rights, I think he has shown a propensity to shoot too quickly. At the very least he should be reassigned to a desk job.