Closer look at the Constitution Party

You must have me mistaken, my friend, find a quote where I have been an ardent defender of the CP. Or, in your mind, is any opposition of President Bush a sure indication that one is a die hard CP member?

You ignore my correction of the poster who questioned the Christianity of those who voted for Bush.

http://www.baptistboard.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php/topic/18/2563/4.html#000047

 

Do you have any evidence whatsoever that the Cponstitution Party has ever made any of these claims, or are you lying?

 

I didn't know that it was the CP who criticised Rumsfield for that signature thing. I'd like to see evidence for that one.

 

The CP may be small but it is deadly.

 

Are you going to show us where the CP criticised Rumsfield for using a signature machine?

I am not critical of that.

 

Yeah, all 140,000 who voted for Peroutka, many of which are not CP members are deadly.

Why not outlaw the party? You think the Department of Homeland Security can find a way to arrest everyone who voted Peroutka under the Patriot Act?

 

It's a conspiracy.

You know, I have noticed this trend about CP supporters...

Joseph Botwinick

 

Deadly.

 

Yeah, all 140,000 who voted for Peroutka, many of which are not CP members are deadly.

Why not outlaw the party? You think the Department of Homeland Security can find a way to arrest everyone who voted Peroutka under the Patriot Act? </font>[/QUOTE]The public painted your little red wagon blue last November 2.

You always drag out theology but your platform is a formula for national and international disaster, as you well know. Frankly, I question the use of sizzle in the selection of steaks. I remember the old steak houses on State Street in Chicago. They had flame-broiled steaks cooked in the window. They looked so good. But they were steaks butchered from the bulls of Mexican bullfights--tough as shoe leather. Chicagoans might have been the ones to coin the term buying the sizzle instead of the steak.

We know you by your fruit--one of your heroes is convicted tax cheat and cheapskate Greg Dixon.

 

Uh - wrong.

And, btw, you still haven't shown us where the CP criticised Rumsfield for the signature machine as you claimed. You still haven't shown me where I have.

 

I've also never seen a claim from the CP that they are the only true Christians. Any evidence for that one CMG?

 

Bingo!

Day after day, CMG makes virulent un-Christian attacks on the CP.

He's probably made well over a hundred posts attacking the CP. One of his attacks was so vile, that a moderator had to immediately delete his entire post one time.

If the CP is really as irrelevant, worthless and powerless as CMG's continued rants suggest---why on earth does he spend so much time attacking it?

However, he never misses an opportunity to defend the Republicans---the same Republican party that had gay rights supporter Marc Racicot as its chairman. Racicot was fully supported by Bush.

 

Feel free to address me directly if you like. The moderators like to stand up for the CP because they are members of the CP or supporters of the CP.

The CP is a disaster waiting to happen. They have joined with the left in declaring the war in Iraq illegal, and they have called for the ending of all foreign aid, even Food For Peace started by Ike.

The CP never misses a chance to attack the GOP and the GOP only. They will quote libertarians if necessary. They say that Christians should not vote for Bush, not just you, Conservative Christian, but many others have posted that thought. The CP has made thousands of attacks against Bush. They were attacking him immediately after the election.

I am waiting for the CP to give Bush a break, but I do not believe that it will ever happen.

 

Go read some of Pennsylvania Jim's posts.

 

I doubt if this is a contradiction of the above statement by you.

 

I never questioned the Christianity of those who voted for Bush.

I must ask that you and CMG stop bearing false witness against me immediately.

 

I appreciate that, CC.

 

For the record, C4K and cmg ain't in cahoots, is we, C4K? I ain't Irish.

CC, don't worry about it. No one intentionally dealt falsely with you. Your words might have been ambiguous or misleading. Human communication is earmarked by petty misunderstandings so in politics one has to have a thick skin, big man.

 

"For the record, C4K and cmg ain't in cahoots, is we, C4K? I ain't Irish."

Never said or even implied that you were in cahoots. You're STILL falsely representing what I say.

"CC, don't worry about it. No one intentionally dealt falsely with you. Your words might have been ambiguous or misleading. Human communication is earmarked by petty misunderstandings so in politics one has to have a thick skin, big man."

You need to follow your own advice and develop a thicker skin.

Even the slightest criticism of Bush by the CP sends you into a vitriolic frenzy.

Grow up and face the fact that not all Christians are going to bow down to your tin gods---George Bush and the Republican Party.

 

No one implied that you said that C4K and cmg are in cahoots. You had nothing to do with that sentence whatsoever. Anyone who has been here as long as you have--is this your second name?--knows that we agree on nothing. Your linking us in a sentence is very funny to me and I imagine very embarrassing to C4K, who just won Baptist Board member of the year, as you know.

What are you talking about vitriolic frenzy, big man? We just told you that no one was trying to misrepresent you. No one has asked Christians to bow down to tin gods, which is what you unkindly say about the President of the USA and his private political party. I am just writing this one off to Kerry and Peroutka.