KenH
Well-Known Member
No.Originally posted by UnchartedSpirit:
so what Isreal went through, with all their religious turnarounds, is not a warning for other nations on what could happen to them?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No.Originally posted by UnchartedSpirit:
so what Isreal went through, with all their religious turnarounds, is not a warning for other nations on what could happen to them?
No it's not Brother Curtis. It is a sin to steal from and oppress the poor which is the general rule of the rich according to James 5. Also Paul tells us that not many noble are called in 1Cor.Originally posted by Brother James:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Bro. Curtis:
Brother James, is it a sin to be rich ?
Only the smart ones.Originally posted by hillclimber:
.
And a capitalist wants to always make more money or provide more product or service, and reinvesting profits is the way they do it. No brainer.
It seems to me that the "working class" has a lot more wealth than ever before in history. They own the skills. The owners own the jobs. </font>[/QUOTE]----------------------------Originally posted by Rocko9:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dragoon68:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by billwald:
It has been several hundred years since anything hindered the transfer of assets from the working class to our owners except maybe the Russian revolution.
What is disposable income? Is that income that you never see? If that is the case then I have plenty of that.Originally posted by Dragoon68:
It seems to me people today have a lot more material wealth than their parents and grandparents did and have that much earlier in thier lives. Maybe they do pay more for some services, pay more taxes, and are burdened with supporting a lot more leaches on society but they sure seem to have a lot more "disposable income" as it's called. [/QB]
From the voice of experience... no it isn't.Originally posted by UnchartedSpirit:
OK, Thats mainly due now to those South American illegal aliens stealing our jobs because they're more attractive,and can be abused easier.
That is a demonstrably false statement.Originally posted by billwald:
It has been several hundred years since anything hindered the transfer of assets from the working class to our owners except maybe the Russian revolution.
What kind of business? Is he sure they are illegals or is he judging that by their appearance? Are they doing poor work? Being paid below minimum wage? Not paying payroll taxes?Originally posted by UnchartedSpirit:
Well, my father is losing all his labor jobs to them.
From the voice of experience... no it isn't.Originally posted by Scott J:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by UnchartedSpirit:
OK, Thats mainly due now to those South American illegal aliens stealing our jobs because they're more attractive,and can be abused easier.
Agreed, as long as it is a level playing field and that companies do not take advantage of the low pay. Companies should pay fairly, it affects the living environment of our country when they do not.Originally posted by Scott J:
I agree that illegals should become legal. But they shouldn't be rejected on the basis that they out-compete natives for jobs.
Doesn't make any difference if they commit more crimes or less crimes, doesn't make any difference if they require more or less free health care.Originally posted by Bro. Curtis:
Can anyone show some proof that illegal immigrants from Mexico commit more crimes, or require more free health care than any group of Americans ?
Originally posted by Dragoon68:
It seems to me people today have a lot more material wealth than their parents and grandparents did and have that much earlier in thier lives. Maybe they do pay more for some services, pay more taxes, and are burdened with supporting a lot more leaches on society but they sure seem to have a lot more "disposable income" as it's called.
I don't think that's what it means but it may not be a bad definition, Rocko9! Come to think of it, a lot of my income is disposed of by various governments, insurance companies, etc. so I guess that does make it "disposable"!Originally posted by Rocko9:
What is disposable income? Is that income that you never see? If that is the case then I have plenty of that.![]()
![]()
This shows that over the last 30 years people continue to make more each decade before. This isn't by any means the whole story and I'm sure, as with all data, there are many ways it can be evaluated. It is clear that each lower 20% group hasn't faired as well as the higher groups but yet all have still done better that in the previous decade.Extracted from US census data:
Mean income of families in 2004 adjusted dollars:
Year Lowest Second Third Fourth Highest
20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
2000 $15,490 $35,417 $55,664 $82,037 $172,123
1990 13,780 32,142 49,501 71,188 132,300
1980 13,920 30,302 45,777 63,510 106,931
1970 12,908 28,542 41,269 55,669 95,729