DC
Who say ye that I am?
Thou art the Christ the Son of the living God.
Flesh and blood did not reveal that unto you but my Father which is in heaven.
If you see relevance of this, you will need to explain it.
In view in Matthew 16 is that Peter is enlightened by God to know that Jesus is the long awaited Messiah. This does not mean Peter was trusting in the Risen Savior:
Matthew 16:20-23
King James Version (KJV)
20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
God has always enlightened men who are natural to spiritual truth, because we know that no man has the ability in his natural condition to know or receive the spiritual things of God.
Now, Percho...what relevance is there in your quote to the discussion at hand?
Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: ----- Jesus commended the spirit of himself into the hands of his Father, the living God.
If you would learn to quote what was already said and answer that directly, there would be no need for me to reiterate what I already said.
The ball is in your court, lol, it is for you to address what I already said on this in the previous post.
At that point did the living Jesus to into the hands of his Father, the living God?
Or was the sinless one, the one who the virgin Mary had brought forth from her womb and they called his name Jesus, dead, because of our sins?
I guess you have a concept of Christ being caught up by God when He died physically, which is not what is in view in regards to the Lord "committing His spirit to the Father," just as that is not in view in the following:
John 10:27-29
King James Version (KJV)
27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
The Lord is simply acknowledging God's Sovereignty in the matter.
Or was the sinless one, the one who the virgin Mary had brought forth from her womb and they called his name Jesus, dead, because of our sins?
C'mon, Percho.
1. It is basic that Christ died for the sins of the world. That means your sins, that means my sins.
2. Christ died physically...not spiritually on the Cross, so yes...He died.
3. That His physical death was sufficient for the payment of sins is evident in His statement "...it is finished!"
Christ did not go into Hades to continue making Atonement, that was accomplished through...His death. That death was physical, and His going into Hades was for the purpose of declaring victory over sin and death and liberating the Just from Hades. When we consider the statement "...you will not leave my "soul" in Hades" we understand this to be a reference to the hope of resurrection (though prophetic of Christ), so we make a mistake, in my view, when we do not distinguish the prophetic nature of the Prophecy itself and how that is used in connection with Christ. It is similar to Christ's statement "My God! My GOd! Why hast thou forsaken me," when we make it a concept that the Father deserted Christ, or, turned His back on Him. We have but to look at the Psalm and see it in it's original context and conclude one very simple truth: God never forsook David...either.
When the sinless one gave his life, his being, commended his spirit into the hands of his Father, where was the once living soul Jesus and where was his body of flesh?
The "soul" refers to the person, Percho, so we do not technically ask "Where did Christ's soul go," and if you had read the last post you would have seen that it was clarified...it was His spirit he committed into the hands of the Father...not His soul.
Christ never ceased being alive in spirit, only in the body. That is an important distinction to understand.
His spirit went into Hades, His body lie in the grave. The two comrise the soul, even as we are taught in the beginning:
Genesis 2:7
King James Version (KJV)
7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
If the cults understood this they would forsake their heresies of Soul Sleep and Annihilation.
Six hours later, where was the once living soul Jesus and where was his body of flesh?
The soul, the Person of Christ was in Hades, his body went in the tomb.
Thirty six hours later? ------- and of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou dost not eat of it, for in the day of thine eating of it -- dying thou dost die.' YLT Gen 2:17 Is that what the sinless one did for our sins?
My advice is stay away from the YLT, it confuses more than anything, and tends to help certain cultic ideas. Sincerely comprised, I am sure, but abused, dry, and does not show the Theological understanding seen in other translations.
Secondly, another great misconception and misunderstanding about the verse you quote above is that there is an implication that men gained eternal life from the Tree of Life.
God is the source of eternal life, not that tree, lol. What is in view is man living evermore in the condition Adam is now found in, that is...spiritually dead. When men are born today, in the likeness and image of their earthly fathers (c.f. Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 5:3), they are born separated from God and spiritually dead. If they had access to that tree the best they could hope for would be sustenance of physical life, which is all that was provided men under past Ages. It is not until this Age and the establishment of the New Covenant that the provision for eternal life...came from Heaven.
Lastly, again I ask...relevance?
Continued...