Okay; so what does friendship evangelism have to do with that premise? Are you going to attempt to show that Jesus never engaged in friendship evangelism?To prove that contact evangelism is the way of Jesus (The way of the Master).
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Okay; so what does friendship evangelism have to do with that premise? Are you going to attempt to show that Jesus never engaged in friendship evangelism?To prove that contact evangelism is the way of Jesus (The way of the Master).
Effective evangelism is when people are saved, baptized, and discipled. You are doing none of the above.Biblically speaking if the above is true then the evangelism was effective regardless of the results of evangelism. I
Proverbs 11:30 The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life; and he that winneth souls is wise.It is not our job to win souls
Blasphemy.We need to follow Jesus (The Way of the Master)
More blasphemy.To prove that contact evangelism is the way of Jesus (The way of the Master).
Making disciples is part of the Great Commission. If you are not winning them, baptizing them, and discipling them, you are not fulfilling the Great Commission.Making disciples comes after someone is saved.
evangelist6589 said: ↑
It is not our job to win souls
Okay; so what does friendship evangelism have to do with that premise? Are you going to attempt to show that Jesus never engaged in friendship evangelism?
Impossible as he did sometimes
but it did not dominate his ministry.
When he sent out the 72 what was the method?
When looking closely at the life of Christ & the apostles in the four gospels & Acts there are at least 89 instances of Christ and his associates doing evangelism. 77 took place in the context of contact evangelism. Some notable examples are Matt 5-7, & Matt 9:35. Also when Christ sent out his followers he sent them out as contact evangelists (Mt 10; Lk 10:1-16). Also not to forget his explicit command to preach the gospel to those that they did not already know (Mk 16:15, Acts 1:8). The puritans also were big on contact evangelism because they studied the life of Christ in depth as mentioned in the book Puritan Evangelism, 43. Other examples are Charles Spurgeon, & George Whitefield who were open air preachers and encouraged others to do the same.
Contact evangelism takes great courage and one will usually experience lots of rejection while doing it. The problem with the modern church is that they misinterpret what it means to be effective. Effectiveness can be measured by the following standards.
Was the gospel proclaimed?
Was the gospel understood?
Was Christ glorified?
Was the attitude of the christian Godly as he communicated the gospel?
Biblically speaking if the above is true then the evangelism was effective regardless of the results of evangelism. It is not our job to win souls, it is only our job to proclaim the gospel and let God draw people to salvation (John 6:44).
Next we will look at the book of Acts and make a case for Contact evangelism from there.
Its not an either or prospect. The answer is both and other forms as well.When looking closely at the life of Christ & the apostles in the four gospels & Acts there are at least 89 instances of Christ and his associates doing evangelism. 77 took place in the context of contact evangelism. Some notable examples are Matt 5-7, & Matt 9:35. Also when Christ sent out his followers he sent them out as contact evangelists (Mt 10; Lk 10:1-16). Also not to forget his explicit command to preach the gospel to those that they did not already know (Mk 16:15, Acts 1:8). The puritans also were big on contact evangelism because they studied the life of Christ in depth as mentioned in the book Puritan Evangelism, 43. Other examples are Charles Spurgeon, & George Whitefield who were open air preachers and encouraged others to do the same.
Contact evangelism takes great courage and one will usually experience lots of rejection while doing it. The problem with the modern church is that they misinterpret what it means to be effective. Effectiveness can be measured by the following standards.
Was the gospel proclaimed?
Was the gospel understood?
Was Christ glorified?
Was the attitude of the christian Godly as he communicated the gospel?
Biblically speaking if the above is true then the evangelism was effective regardless of the results of evangelism. It is not our job to win souls, it is only our job to proclaim the gospel and let God draw people to salvation (John 6:44).
Next we will look at the book of Acts and make a case for Contact evangelism from there.
So once again, what's the actual premise and purpose of this thread? Because you used "vs" in your thread title; what did you mean by that?Impossible as he did sometimes but it did not dominate his ministry.
So once again, what's the actual premise and purpose of this thread? Because you used "vs" in your thread title; what did you mean by that?
So once again, what's the actual premise and purpose of this thread? Because you used "vs" in your thread title; what did you mean by that?
This is a lie straight from the pit of hell.
Its not an either or prospect. The answer is both and other forms as well.
I think you fail to read closely enough. Virtually the entire New Testament revolves around discipleship.Yes but the dominant format in scripture is contact evangelism.
I think you fail to read closely enough. Virtually the entire New Testament revolves around discipleship.
This simply is not true.Yes but the dominant format in scripture is contact evangelism.
I've read all your posts. They all focus on contact evangelism. So please answer the question: why "vs"?Read some of my posts earlier.