Does this make sense?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Been reading Bawa Boxer again, I see. She's also clueless.
Your cute little photo is a lie. The product on the left isn't covered either. Your moronic, misguided utter fallacies are growing old.
Still clueless ...You are so kind and polite and never given to emotional outbursts and you always research your answers to give clear, rational, educational replies.
Oh by the way read the following article:
5 sexual health services insurance will cover… for men
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/20/5-sexual-health-services-insurance-will-cover-for-men/
Again, you're comparing a legitimate medical concern to the ability to be promiscuous without a second thought. There really is no comparison. It's akin to complaining that a reconstruction for a burn victim is covered, but not a breast augmentation.You are so kind and polite and never given to emotional outbursts and you always research your answers to give clear, rational, educational replies.
Oh by the way read the following article:
5 sexual health services insurance will cover… for men
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/20/5-sexual-health-services-insurance-will-cover-for-men/
Wow. Even if it's true, it makes sense. One is to treat a legitimate medical condition. The other is to "avoid a mistake". Does that make sense?
Comparing vaccinations to birth control? One prevents disease. The other is for pleasure.
Comparing vaccinations to birth control? One prevents disease. The other is for pleasure.
No the government should not, but you're missing the point. The SCOTUS decision doesn't apply to "all birth control." Only "morning after" contraceptives. You're engaging in the hyperbole -- oh, heck I'll call 'em what they are: Lies -- that the Feminazis are touting erroneously.FWIW, I think that birth control pills should be covered, if an insurance company chooses to include them in their policies. I don't think the federal government should mandate them.
Still clueless ...
SCOTUS dealt with the mandate under ACA. The few policies sold independent of ACA are free do cover whatever they want, however they want, wherever they want, at any price.
The ACA does not cover the most popular and well known ED medications!
The only possible reference to birth control not being covered and popular male ED products being covered -- which, again, is a lie -- is the SCOTUS decision. Otherwise you could have posted this months ago. The fact you post it 24 hours after said decision gives the lie to your "protest."You are off topic in your responses as I did not mention SCOTUS and their recent decision. Try to keep up. I was sure some Yo yo would not understand.
It appears the birth control pills ARE covered...
Makes me wonder what you think of all those posts I've made stating that say it is.
The product on the left is Viagara. Am I missing something, TNID, and ITL ? What is your fight ? I thought the two of you agreed on this.