Covered ...... Not Covered

[Bro. Curtis]

But the post you referenced, he is talking about Viagara, I thought.

 

[InTheLight]

But the post you referenced, he is talking about Viagara, I thought.

Yes, CTB said that Viagara (pictured on left in OP) was covered but birth control pills (pictured on right) weren't covered. TND said that neither were covered "the one on the left isn't covered either." I said the the pill was covered whereupon TND said "Makes me wonder what you think of all those posts I've made stating that say it is."

Well, I haven't seen those posts where TND said the pill was covered. Have you?

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Thanx for the 'splainin', and no, I haven't.


And this renders the O/P kinda untrue, don't it ?

 

[Revmitchell]

Does this make sense?

Has anyone else noticed that the image in the op is provide by NARAL a pro-abortion group? Look in the bottom right hand corner of the image.


You can say you do not support abortion but the evidence just mounts up to show otherwise.

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Show me the post where you said they were covered. Previously, in post #2 you said:

Until you pointed it out, I didn't realize I added "either," which I shouldn't have added, I admit. But it is clear in my posts #11 and #13 that I said the whole thing is a lie. So get over it.

 

[Salty]

When I saw the title, I was thinking a Covered Dish church dinner - oh well, now back to the OP

 

[Don]

Funny, ain't it? When the SC upheld the ACA, CTB told us to get over it; it was law. Now that the shoe's on the other foot, he wants to show how unfair things are.

 

[Salty]

Funny, ain't it? When the SC upheld the ACA, CTB told us to get over it; it was law. Now that the shoe's on the other foot, he wants to show how unfair things are.

Crabby - tell me it aint so -

You didnt really say that did you?

 

[evenifigoalone]

Friend of mine on another site said her Chrohn's medication costs $168,000 a year. If anything is to be funded, stuff like that should be top priority. Birth control isn't that expensive.
Honestly, I prefer to pay for meds out of pocket if I can. My meds, my health, my responsibility. There are some cases where the meds are too expensive to get without help, however. But birth control isn't one of them. (BTW, not implying that I use birth control. I don't.)

I will concede that birth control has some legitimate medical uses, and in those cases I might support them being funded. But just to prevent the possibility of a baby? That's the individual's responsibility, not the state's.
We only have so much tax payer's money, let's prioritize a little better. People with life threatening conditions or conditions that severely affect their health and lifestyle come first.