Well, I dont find it funny. The Bible says "Go ye into all the World"
It doesn't say its okay to let Democrats go to Hell.
WWJD?
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Critical race theory social sciences
- Thread starter Revmitchell
- Start date
Well, I dont find it funny. The Bible says "Go ye into all the World"
It doesn't say its okay to let Democrats go to Hell.
WWJD?
Loosen up a bit Salty. Nobody said "its okay to let Democrats go to Hell." The "laugh" emoji was desired for the comment from Reynolds; "--would rather hang out with snakes, skeeters, hogs, and sand gnats than be around a Democrat." Sorta embraces my feelings.
I have prayed for the dems to accept Christ, but judging from the actions of so many of them, they are bound & determined to follow the other side to the end.
So, the choice is theirs, whether OK or not with any of us!
Why Countries Collapse - PaulCraigRoberts.org
There is no way anyone could convince me otherwise that this is the main objective of the current democrat party. After the demise of the country, they figure since they helped orchestrate it, they will then have total control, except for whomever propped them up to the finish line will still pull the strings. Sounds like Putin gets it.
There is no way anyone could convince me otherwise that this is the main objective of the current democrat party. After the demise of the country, they figure since they helped orchestrate it, they will then have total control, except for whomever propped them up to the finish line will still pull the strings. Sounds like Putin gets it.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
…
In other words, the only interest in slavery is in using it as a weapon against American white persons.
Slavery among black Africans existed long before the transatlantic slave trade. The black slaves sold to Europeans were first enslaved by other blacks. Yet black slavery is blamed on white people. This lie is used to foment hatred of whites by blacks and self-hatred by whites indoctrinated in their guilt.
Clearly, this lie has destroyed any prospect of a multicultural America, which is the only America the white liberals believe in.
The purpose of the New York Times’ 1619 Project and Critical Race Theory is to demonize the United States and destroy citizens’ belief in their country. ...
In other words, the only interest in slavery is in using it as a weapon against American white persons.
Slavery among black Africans existed long before the transatlantic slave trade. The black slaves sold to Europeans were first enslaved by other blacks. Yet black slavery is blamed on white people. This lie is used to foment hatred of whites by blacks and self-hatred by whites indoctrinated in their guilt.
Clearly, this lie has destroyed any prospect of a multicultural America, which is the only America the white liberals believe in.
The purpose of the New York Times’ 1619 Project and Critical Race Theory is to demonize the United States and destroy citizens’ belief in their country. ...
Given the entire history of America, when do you think blacks will have controlling power?
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
Those who have been paying attention realize that plenty of blacks have controlling power. Wake up.
Maybe when they are more than 14% of the population.
Do you really believe that? I doubt it. Even Obama was blocked in almost everything he tried to do by white Republicans. Mc Con el stated that his only objective was to strike down everything Obama tried to accomplish. In terms of power and privilege which would you rather be in America, white or black?
quite the racist post
Based on your comment above, that Obama was blocked in almost everything, first I would say that is a wonderful thing, cause he would have wreaked far more destruction on the nation than his “Obama Care” fiasco!!!!
Second, are you saying (implied also) that whites are not receptive to a black in power????? If so, this is circumstantial evidence that he was put in as POTUS - twice - only by election fraud. Could never have happened without MANY white votes - unless fraud was involved!!!!!
I had never considered that possibility, but after the ‘20 elections, I can fully consider this as a strong possibility.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
If a certain category were consistently accounted for as ought, their minority would be clearly shown to have majority control. "Whites" do not have majority control, nor do "whites" promote most of the racism. But certain elements thrive on making such false accusations against "whites." And your posts clearly reflect an affinity for promoting their racism. Wake up.
Are you saying those who voted against Obama did it because he was half black?
or was it because they were trying to stop liberal policies?
Boy, this question is wide open for a plethora of rabbit trails; the construction of his reply (if any) ought to prove extremely amusing!
I guess the Dems were racist for trying to block EVERYTHING Trump did.
I refer you back to post #30!
I'd say it was a combination of the two. What do you think?
The answered is simple - trying to stop liberal policies.
So you appear to thing its because Obama was Black - so which congress voted against him because of that?
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
Only a racist could think that. If FTW is white, that could explain it.
