Darby = Dispensationalism

[revmwc]

Then you need to take a course in Reading Comprehension! You Rapture Ready people are so big on literal interpretation so take what I say literally, not what you think I say!

Originally Posted by OldRegular View Post
I did not say 70AD was the end of the 70th week! I said nothing about the end of the 70th week. I said GOD destroyed the Temple in 70AD! You should learn to read more carefully.
Quote:
GOD mercifully destroyed the Temple in 7o AD and stopped this abomination at the same time judging the Jews for their part in the murder of Jesus Christ.

So folks how do you read this? Especially the part in read.

Here is the statement by OR:

I did not say 70AD was the end of the 70th week! I said nothing about the end of the 70th week. I said GOD destroyed the Temple in 70AD! You should learn to read more carefully.

So I am misreading it or did he say that it ended in A.D. 70?

 

[OldRegular]

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldRegular
Then you need to take a course in Reading Comprehension! You Rapture Ready people are so big on literal interpretation so take what I say literally, not what you think I say!

Originally Posted by OldRegular
I did not say 70AD was the end of the 70th week! I said nothing about the end of the 70th week. I said GOD destroyed the Temple in 70AD! You should learn to read more carefully.

GOD mercifully destroyed the Temple in 70 AD and stopped this abomination at the same time judging the Jews for their part in the murder of Jesus Christ.

So folks how do you read this? Especially the part in read.

Here is the statement by OR:

I did not say 70AD was the end of the 70th week! I said nothing about the end of the 70th week. I said GOD destroyed the Temple in 70AD! You should learn to read more carefully.

So I am misreading it or did he say that it ended in A.D. 70?

You still need a course in reading comprehension plus a lesson in honesty which seems to elude some Rapture Ready folks. I said nothing about the end of the 70th week. I said that Jesus Christ was murdered in the middle of the 70th week at the instigation of the Jews!

 

[DHK]

You are apparently relying on a paraphrase in an attempt to prove your point. I don't care what the CEV says. Following is one assessment of the CEV:

So much for the CEV!

The KJV reads: 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

The NASB reads: 27 “And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”

The NKJV reads: 27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate.”

The ESV reads: 27 “And he shall make a strong covenant with the many for one week, and for half of the week he shall put an end to sacrifice and offering; And on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”

DHK, you can't beat me down with the pre-trib-false doctrine you write so what do you do? You use a junk translation like the CEV to accuse me of calling Jesus Christ the Horrible One. If anyone on this Forum is blasphemous it is you for using this junk translation to call Jesus Christ the Horrible One, not me. That was a sleazy sick trick and that is all I have to say to you.

Now that you have had your rant on the CEV, (which was only a distraction to you), answer the post which you have conveniently ignored.

First, the "he" which you say is Christ, is clearly not Christ. He is the Antichrist of the future which will make desecrate a future temple "the abomination of desolation." How can you miss it with such clear wording as this? How can you ascribe the One who is the Lord of Glory to the one who is described as the Antichrist? That is what is blasphemy! Ascribing the characteristics of Satan to Christ. I used the CEV because, even though it is more like a paraphrase, it gives you a better idea of which you don't seem to understand through the more literal and older translations.
Why do you think it used the phrase "the Horrible One"? Obviously, the "he" is not talking of Christ! It is referring to the Antichrist, which you ignore even though the other translations say the same thing just not so clearly.
Why the denial?

Christ died at the end of 483 years, not at the end of 483 years plus another three and a half years. You have no proof of that. I already gave you the math. Can you refute it?