• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dead actor Philip Seymour Hoffman: Heroin purchase just before overdose

Jedi Knight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
On a similar post QUOTE:"Welcome MR. Hoffman! We've been waiting for you!!
Hoffman: no, No, NO oh dear GOD NO!!!! The Flames!! Oh, GOD NO!!!!!
Yes!!!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOoooooooo!..............................
We're waiting for all of you who will not accept Jesus Christ as your LORD and Savior!!!!!" BTW you can safe bet this wasn't Joel Osteen's quote!
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
On a similar post QUOTE:"Welcome MR. Hoffman! We've been waiting for you!!
Hoffman: no, No, NO oh dear GOD NO!!!! The Flames!! Oh, GOD NO!!!!!
Yes!!!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOoooooooo!..............................
We're waiting for all of you who will not accept Jesus Christ as your LORD and Savior!!!!!" BTW you can safe bet this wasn't Joel Osteen's quote!

Simply not funny.:tear:
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
So sad. Every time I hear these stories I just hold onto the hope that maybe the person had come into a right relationship with Christ at some point.
PFFFFFFFFFFFFT!!! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
You are saying that the reason to not ban alcohol, which is a drug, though you admit the harm it does, is because of money. It profits people and too many people would be harmed, financially, without it.

Which is exactly what I've been saying.

People aren't honestly concerned with the ailments these things cause people.

It's all about the money.

You admit the harm, want one drug illegal because it is harmful, yet want another harmful drug legal because it puts money in pockets, and you don't see a moral dilemma with your position, and further, admonish me to repent of my contrasting views? That's not right. I couldn't look at myself in the mirror if I based my views on what provided the best economic security, though I admit, it wouldn't be the first time I've been faced with that dilemma and actually considered it. But no.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWdUJIlSYxU


That sounds like the jist of it.

Look at all the money the drug cartels would lose Or the big banks that launder their money. Or the government that spends billions every year for a few headlines. Or the prison industrial complex that taxpayers support.

In the case of the hemp plant think of all the profits the paper and plastics and big chemical industries would lose. Legalizing hemp might even cut into big oil's profits. We can't have the Duponts and the Rothschilds going without now can we?

No keep drugs illegal so all the profits and rewrads keep going to the same people. And let's keep drugs illegal to keep all the power where it belongs, with the drug suppliers, big banks, corporations and big government and out of the hands of the people because we can't be trusted with it.

Freedom is slavery. So let's not go there.

If we really look at TND's argument there is no conflict or dilema. He simply want sto keep the profits and power in the same hands whether it be those who profit from legalized alcohol or illegal drugs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top