• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Debate Poll: Did Leighton Flowers actually exegete Rom. 9 in his debate w/ Dr. White?

Debate Poll: Did Leighton Flowers actually exegete Rom. 9 in his debate w/ Dr. White?


  • Total voters
    4

Greektim

Well-Known Member
In case you haven't seen it yet, here is the debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbEnNiIlujw

What do you think?

My opinion is that no he did not exegete the text in the traditional sense. Some might call what he did eisogesis. However, my slant is that he simply applied a deductive argument and hoped people would make the parallel case for themselves. However, exegesis is more of an inductive exercise. I actually had my Greek text opened for White's presentation. It was not needed w/ Flowers b/c he didn't really comment on the previous context, grammar, or syntax of the passage in question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
that's why everyone felt he was a no show in the debate.

you go to with the bait and you don't work through the passage that's what Dr White was telling them we don't do that with the Trinity we don't do that with any of the teaching why you doing it with Romans 9
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In case you haven't seen it yet, here is the debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbEnNiIlujw

What do you think?

My opinion is that no he did not exegete the text in the traditional sense. Some might call what he did eisogesis. However, my slant is that he simply applied a deductive argument and hoped people would make the parallel case for themselves. However, exegesis is more of an inductive exercise. I actually had my Greek text opened for White's presentation. It was not needed w/ Flowers b/c he didn't really comment on the previous context, grammar, or syntax of the passage in question.

Is our Brother still stuck then on his views that God had a special dealings with the jews of time of Christ, as he did a unique hardening to them, but cannot use their experiences to validate anything one way or another, as that was a one time event in history?
 

Greektim

Well-Known Member
Is our Brother still stuck then on his views that God had a special dealings with the jews of time of Christ, as he did a unique hardening to them, but cannot use their experiences to validate anything one way or another, as that was a one time event in history?
Basically, yes.
 
Top