Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It's funny. I've always thought of the case of Cornelius being a problem passage for Calvinists because he was doing good things, on his own, before he was saved and God approved of it. That and several other passages seem to suggest that even for people who aren't saved, they are way better off doing right with whatever light they have because God may notice that and assist them more in salvation. It could be used as an argument against unconditional election - especially if you take it to the extreme that some Calvinists do and say that God automatically hates anything a person tries to do before he is saved.Of course, only the born-again can do this. But it shows that His atoned for elect are found in people like Cornelius who did "saved" works long before he ever heard Peter preach. Why preach if only the born-again can discern the truth in it?
No where in John 3 did Christ use the term 'second birth'. He spoke only of born from above synonymous with born of the Spirit:
7 `Thou mayest not wonder that I said to thee, It behoveth you to be born from above;
8 the Spirit where he willeth doth blow, and his voice thou dost hear, but thou hast not known whence he cometh, and whither he goeth; thus is every one who hath been born of the Spirit.` Jn 3
Only the born-from above can do works the way Cornelius did. Why witness to Muslims if God, did not, as He did with the Roman Cornelius, bring some to life, to yet hear the gospel? Catholics too. How many of them re-formed Catholicism away from the Antichrist Papacy in the day?It's funny. I've always thought of the case of Cornelius being a problem passage for Calvinists because he was doing good things, on his own, before he was saved and God approved of it. That and several other passages seem to suggest that even for people who aren't saved, they are way better off doing right with whatever light they have because God may notice that and assist them more in salvation. It could be used as an argument against unconditional election - especially if you take it to the extreme that some Calvinists do and say that God automatically hates anything a person tries to do before he is saved.
Only the born-from above
Percho. Maybe I misunderstood your post but is seemed like you were comparing God approaching Abraham to you or me or some pastor giving out the gospel to a general audience. I don't agree that that's a valid comparison.
What if you did not ask the Lord to save you? The truth is, you were saved before it came to mind to do that. If you didn't already believe (possess salvation according to Christ) you would not have done that. But your faith was shifted away from Christ back into your actions as being what saved you. Get your theology right and it will give God the glory in salvation instead of yourself.
The kingdom came when Daniel said it would. But only the born again can see it, even today. Since they can't see it, they look for the Pharisee's premillennial kingdom in the future. But it is not the kingdom.I am saying IMHO The calling of Abraham was no different than these; Acts 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: - and-
Acts 15:14 Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
And that is relative to the kingdom of God.
There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out. Luke 13:28
Question? Is Jesus preaching, the gospel of the kingdom of God, an enhancement of the kingdom spoken of in Daniel 2:34,35 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth. ---- Who are going to be the rulers? Plural?
Salvation- saved from what, unto, for what?
The Greek ἄνωθεν, is also used for AGAIN, ANEW, SECOND TIME, as the Greek lexicons tell us. BDAG; Liddell & Scott; Thayer; Abbot-Smith; A T Robertson; Marvin Vincent; John Gill; Jamieson, fausset, Brown; Matthew Henry, etc, etc.
Nicodemus's non-enlightenment should not affect the correct rendering of Christ's intent with the word 'anothen' here. Anothen ( from above, from a higher place, of things which come from heaven or God, from the first, from the beginning, from the very first, anew, over again) can mean 'anew' or 'over again', but that's not what Christ meant, thus His further explanation in the next verse:
5 Jesus answered, `Verily, verily, I say to thee, If any one may not be born of water, and the Spirit, he is not able to enter into the reign of God;
6 that which hath been born of the flesh is flesh, and that which hath been born of the Spirit is spirit. Jn 1 YLT
Christ wasn't speaking of an earthly physical birth which Nicodemus wrongly perceived, He was speaking of a spiritual birth FROM ABOVE.
"Born from above" syncs with a large amount of other scripture, old and new, and is consistent with the apostle John's (James also) intended use of the word anothen:
3 Jesus answered and said to him, 'Verily, verily, I say to thee, If any one may not be born from above, he is not able to see the reign of God;' (YLT)
7 'Thou mayest not wonder that I said to thee, It behoveth you to be born from above; (YLT)
31 He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly , and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all. Jn 3
11 Jesus answered , Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
23 Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a part; and also his coat: now the coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout . Jn 19
As is the case with James:
17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Ja 1
15 This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.
17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure , then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. Ja 3
YLT conveys a 'celestial motif' in the dialogue (yea, the entire chapter) between Christ and Nicodemus that the rendering 'born again' misses:
2 this one came unto him by night, and said to him, `Rabbi, we have known that from God thou hast come -- a teacher, for no one these signs is able to do that thou dost, if God may not be with him.`
3 Jesus answered and said to him, `Verily, verily, I say to thee, If any one may not be born from above, he is not able to see the reign of God;`
7 `Thou mayest not wonder that I said to thee, It behoveth you to be born from above;
21 but he who is doing the truth doth come to the light, that his works may be manifested, that in God they are having been wrought.`
27 John answered and said, `A man is not able to receive anything, if it may not have been given him from the heaven
31 he who from above is coming is above all; he who is from the earth, from the earth he is, and from the earth he speaketh; he who from the heaven is coming is above all. Jn 3 YLT
Born again, or born anew gives all you free willer enemies of sovereign grace 'wiggle room' to lay claim or take credit for something you had zilch to do with. You were 100% totally passive in the birth from above:
13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Jn 1
The kingdom came when Daniel said it would. But only the born again can see it, even today. Since they can't see it, they look for the Pharisee's premillennial kingdom in the future. But it is not the kingdom.
Just out of curiosity, what do you guys think of this popular song being sung in Calvinistic churches:
Let not conscience make you linger
Nor of fitness fondly dream
All the fitness he requireth
Is to feel your need of Him
I will rise and go to Jesus
He will embrace me in his arms
In the arms of my dear Savior
Oh there are ten thousand charms
Is the person doing a work if they rise and go to Jesus?
xr, no one believes there is no response. The issue entirely revolves around who is the cause and what is the effect.Tyndale 1946. I appreciate your post because you get to the point and don't beat around the bush! Of course you won't think that song is an invitation song if you don't believe in invitations. As for the Ethiopian eunuch, he was probably of the Jewish faith at the time and needed to be told that Jesus was the Messiah but you don't know that he was already saved. Where did you come up with that? Jesus certainly did tell Nicodemus how to be saved. Keep reading and you'll come to a little known verse John 3:16.
And I didn't "forget" the first verse, I just didn't know how long to make the post. I actually debated whether to go with the popular words used nowadays or the original which was actually more Calvinistic. That song, according the hymn history website was indeed designed as an invitation song. The site is probably wrong though so I'm glad we have you.
"We are not just saved eternally, we are saved daily too." I'm assuming you meant daily repentance which I agree with. You cannot repeatedly get saved. Justification is done once.
Honestly, this idea that some of you have, where somehow you are triggered at any mention of a person actually doing something in the process of his salvation is something I have never heard of before. It is completely unheard of in Puritan literature. I'm not talking about works or merit or I would agree with you, but faith and repentance? We have a problem.
Six hour warning
This thread will be closed no sooner than 130 am EST (Sat) / 1030 pm PST (Fri)