Defending Biblical Dispensational Teaching. What Are Your Questions

[37818]

Scripture says there is no distinction between Jew and Gentile in the eyes of God.

No, it does not. ". . . them . . ." and the "Israel of God."

 

[Yeshua1]

No, it does not. ". . . them . . ." and the "Israel of God."

Who would be all saved Jews and Gentiles!

 

[robycop3]

So would be symbolic, pointing towards the Cross of Christ, so all nations would be having that memorial unto him?

Not sure-never looked at it much.

 

[MB]

I perceive dispensational theology to be unbiblical and void of truth; a dangerous distortion of God’s word.

Are you saying I am not “born again” because I don’t believe dispensational theology?

Yes or no will do. No need to post volumes of scripture distorted by your unbiblical views.

Additionally, you have failed to defend dispensationalism (there is no defense for false doctrine) and you continuously failed to answer simple questions from scripture that easily disprove dispensationalism.

Peace to you

Funny I feel the same way about Calvinism it's a false doctrine
MB

 

[Yeshua1]

Funny I feel the same way about Calvinism it's a false doctrine
MB

Except Jesus and paul held it!

 

[canadyjd]

Funny I feel the same way about Calvinism it's a false doctrine
MB

That’s fine. I won’t question your salvation because we disagree.

peace to you

 

[tyndale1946]

I answered Tyndale 1946's question in my post # 109 & he hasn't replied.

You know robycop3 there is no reply necessary, read scripture!... YOU DO NOT KNOW THE KJV!... You think you do?... YOU DON'T!... We're done here!... Brother Glen

 

[canadyjd]

What is clear from this thread is that those who believe dispensationalism cannot defend their beliefs in light of scripture. They cannot answer any questions beyond regurgitating “that’s for the church age only” when scripture demonstrates that is untrue.

Given the choice between embracing the truth of scripture in context and holding on to the unbiblical dispensation theology, they ignore the truth of scripture and maintain dispensationalism is the only thing that makes sense.

Some will arrogantly suggest is you are unable to “perceive” the truth of dispensationalism, you should re-examine whether you are “born again”.

Bottom line, this thread did not defend dispensationalism nor answer questions concerning it.

peace to you

 

[JD731]

I perceive dispensational theology to be unbiblical and void of truth; a dangerous distortion of God’s word.

Are you saying I am not “born again” because I don’t believe dispensational theology?

Yes or no will do. No need to post volumes of scripture distorted by your unbiblical views.

Additionally, you have failed to defend dispensationalism (there is no defense for false doctrine) and you continuously failed to answer simple questions from scripture that easily disprove dispensationalism.

Peace to you

The answer is no, but unlike you I have not posted ridiculous claims that I have no biblical reason to believe.i have given you my reasoning from the only source I know from which to determine truth that no one could know without it. You have only whined and made allegations about things you don’t believe without explaining why you don’t believe it and you have only given us your opinion. You are expressing nothing from the standpoint of light and knowledge.

I am not interested in what you believe until you can prove it in context from the scriptures without conflicts in doctrine. I will dismiss you and wait for a dialog with a more mature thinker.

 

[canadyjd]

The answer is no, but unlike you I have not posted ridiculous claims that I have no biblical reason to believe.i have given you my reasoning from the only source I know from which to determine truth that no one could know without it. You have only whined and made allegations about things you don’t believe without explaining why you don’t believe it and you have only given us your opinion. You are expressing nothing from the standpoint of light and knowledge.

I am not interested in what you believe until you can prove it in context from the scriptures without conflicts in doctrine. I will dismiss you and wait for a dialog with a more mature thinker.

I gave you scripture. Ephesians says the two groups, Jew and Gentile, have been made into one new man by the work of Jesus on the cross. It further states that truth will demonstrate the grace of Christ “in the ages to come”. There is no separate future for Israel and the Church.

You cannot maintain your false theology in light of this truth from scripture, so you ignore what it plainly states and would have the work of the cross of Christ undone so your theology can stand.

When you cannot answer the truth of scripture you “dismiss” the person as an immature thinker.

You are deceived by a false theology. I pray God Holy Spirit convict you of that truth.

Until then, dismiss all you want.

peace to you

 

[robycop3]

You know robycop3 there is no reply necessary, read scripture!... YOU DO NOT KNOW THE KJV!... You think you do?... YOU DON'T!... We're done here!... Brother Glen

I likely know the KJV better than you as the same proof Scriptures I provided from newer, better versions are in the KJV. Otherwise, you wouldn't've asked me to provide Scriptural proof for the millenium.

 

[canadyjd]

….

I am not interested in what you believe until you can prove it in context from the scriptures without conflicts in doctrine. I will dismiss you and wait for a dialog with a more mature thinker.

So here a summary of your arguments. First you say Jesus fulfilled the law. When I point out that Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 that He came to fulfill the law and the prophets, you said He didn’t fulfill the law and the prophets.

“Read it carefully”, you said

Read carefully. Jesus came to fulfill the law and the prophets, he said, he did not say he fulfilled them. Fulfilling the law and the prophets demanded that Israel repent and receive him as the promised Messiah and king of Israel, which they refused to do….

Now, this statement demonstrates two things. You are stunningly ignorant of OT prophecy concerning the rejection and death of the Messiah and that you read your false theology into every passage of scripture in an attempt to make scripture conform to the theology.

….
I am not interested in what you believe until you can prove it in context from the scriptures without conflicts in doctrine…...

Here you prove my latter point. No matter what Scripture teaches in context, you will not believe it if it conflicts with your doctrine.

And so, you will remain blind to the truth of scripture in favor of embracing your false doctrine.

peace to you

 

[tyndale1946]

I likely know the KJV better than you as the same proof Scriptures I provided from newer, better versions are in the KJV. Otherwise, you wouldn't've asked me to provide Scriptural proof for the millenium.

One more time and get it through your noggin... This is not talking about the millenium. I believe in an eternal resurrection, I don't believe in a millenium or a rapture... Check your Catholic resources Baptist and you'll find it!... I let the cat out of the bag!... Oh Well!... Brother Glen

 

[canadyjd]

….

I am not interested in what you believe until you can prove it in context from the scriptures without conflicts in doctrine…..

Just to make this clear.

In this post you readily admit you will not accept the truth of scripture in context if it conflicts with your doctrine.

You then accuse me of being an immature thinker.

Peace to you

 

[MB]

I gave you scripture. Ephesians says the two groups, Jew and Gentile, have been made into one new man by the work of Jesus on the cross. It further states that truth will demonstrate the grace of Christ “in the ages to come”. There is no separate future for Israel and the Church.

John wrote that there is;
Rev_7:4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel..

You cannot maintain your false theology in light of this truth from scripture, so you ignore what it plainly states and would have the work of the cross of Christ undone so your theology can stand.

What a bunch of hooey! Just typical Calvinist insults. Your only means of defense is your blasted insults

When you cannot answer the truth of scripture you “dismiss” the person as an immature thinker.

You are imature;

You are deceived by a false theology. I pray God Holy Spirit convict you of that truth.

Until then, dismiss all you want.


peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

John wrote that there is;
Rev_7:4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel..

What a bunch of hooey! Just typical Calvinist insults. Your only means of defense is your blasted insults


You are imature;

And so we disagree.

Thanks for the conversation

peace to you

 

[canadyjd]

No, it does not. ". . . them . . ." and the "Israel of God."

Th “Israel of God” from Romans is referring to all those among Jews and Gentiles who are the children of the promise by having accepted Christ as Savior and are now part of the Church.

peace to you

 

[Salty]

Six hour warning -

This thread will be closed no sooner than 430 pm EDT / 130 pm PDT

This thread is closed