On the colleges and seminaries forum, my Christology was called "Alexandrian." I don't know why. But the context of that shows that the one who said it meant it as as an insult.
The thread was closed, so this question was not answered.
I would understand that "Alexandrian Christology" would refer to the Christology of the major theologians in Northern Africa of the 4th and 5th centuries.
Does it mean something else to folk here?
I have read several times the Christology of major Alexandrian writers as Athanasius and Cyril, and I do not agree wholly with it, especially with their writings about of the hypostatic union.
On that issue, I am more Antiochene , I am more like Nestorius, when read in primary sources, or Theodret in his responses to Cyril's 12 anathemas.
So, is "Alexandrian Christology" to some here a term of disrepect, a "put down," a remark describing liberals?
If so, why?
The issue is important as it is about how to understand the Person of Christ.
Bill
The thread was closed, so this question was not answered.
I would understand that "Alexandrian Christology" would refer to the Christology of the major theologians in Northern Africa of the 4th and 5th centuries.
Does it mean something else to folk here?
I have read several times the Christology of major Alexandrian writers as Athanasius and Cyril, and I do not agree wholly with it, especially with their writings about of the hypostatic union.
On that issue, I am more Antiochene , I am more like Nestorius, when read in primary sources, or Theodret in his responses to Cyril's 12 anathemas.
So, is "Alexandrian Christology" to some here a term of disrepect, a "put down," a remark describing liberals?
If so, why?
The issue is important as it is about how to understand the Person of Christ.
Bill
Last edited by a moderator: