Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Really? You are going to use our Lord Jesus Christ's death on the cross as an example of God being in favor of the death penalty?:tear:If he is not OK with the notion of capital punishment...
Didn't He use state ordered execution with regard to the death of jesus on the Cross?
Did God Approve the Death penalty to have Jesus Killed By it?
What kind of question is that?
the Roamn state executed jesus as a criminal, and was within their right to do that, so how doesn't that support that God approved the death penalty to be used?
Their reasoning made it was an unrighteous murder. And that's the only type of decision humans can make when it comes to life and death as we're all guilty of sin that is punishable unto death.
You mention that the Romans executed Jesus with seemingly no regard for the fact that Jesus hadn't done anything wrong. Thus, to mention it supports the teachings of Scripture that show that we are NOT to make such a decision because only God is capable of making such a righteous decision.
But as in the OT, it was once again GOD making the decision to RIGHTEOUSLY give His life.. They could not have taken it had He not RIGHTEOUSLY given it.
God ordained the method of hiow jesus was to die, and that was the Cross...
just saying that God used captial punishemnt , was in His Will..
And IF the ONLY perfect person to ever live was executed...
How much more so would criminals actually deserving it be getting executed?
yes, GOD did. Not man.
Because He's capable of making the righteous judgment to do so. Man isn't.
Unrighteously by men as He had done nothing wrong.
You break one, you broke them all. Are you any less deserving of death than these criminals you're describing?
yes i am!
In the sense of getting to heaven, to be with God, ALL have sinned and fallen short of His glory...
But for here on earth..
Do you honestly think killing someone in cold blood merits same punishemnt as stealinga candy bar from store/ taht God sees all sins equally as to temporal punishment?
In the Pentatuch, God ordained capital punishment for many different sins, but NOT for others.
The general statement given to Noah at the time of the Disembarkment was that murder is to be punished by death. Since it was given to Noah, it was understood to be law for all his descendents. that's you and me both, cousin!
My understanding of this is that Jesus death would "undo" the death penalties proscribed under the OT Law, but that the punishment for murder would still be in effect, as was given pre law, as a universal rule!
That's authoring confusion. We are to preach Scripture.. Scripture shows Jesus fulfilling the Law, not undoing it. As such, the death penalty is still law. But NT Scripture shows that we are ALL equally guilty of breaking the WHOLE law. And thus, the words of Christ when the woman was caught in adultery.
We are allowed to punish. But Scripture shows that God HAS NOT, because we're incapable of righteously doing so, given us the right to punish unto death.Only HE is capable of doing that.
God delegated o the govt that right to execute murderers!
What exactly does "universal rule" mean? Is that an "absolute rule" that must be exercised on every occasion?My understanding of this is that Jesus death would "undo" the death penalties proscribed under the OT Law, but that the punishment for murder would still be in effect, as was given pre law, as a universal rule!
So God delegated the duty of punishment unto death for murderers to the same government that's okay with women murdering babies in the womb? but the government doesn't murder them because they don't consider abortion murder?
That makes no sense and authors confusion that is NOT of God.
The fact that the same government that you say God delegated this right too allows one type of murder but not another continues to highlight why God would NOT have entrusted a RIGHTEOUS decision of life and death into the hands of sinful men.
He can make the call. We cannot.
God is o.k. with the notion of Capital Punishment....but, Christ's death on the cross is absolutely no argument in favour of it. I'm pro-death penalty, but I cannot comprehend how Christ's death on the cross is an argument for it.If he is not OK with the notion of capital punishment...
Yes, and the act was called sinful by God.Didn't He use state ordered execution with regard to the death of jesus on the Cross?
God is o.k. with the notion of Capital Punishment....but, Christ's death on the cross is absolutely no argument in favour of it. I'm pro-death penalty, but I cannot comprehend how Christ's death on the cross is an argument for it.
Yes, and the act was called sinful by God.
Act 2:23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain:
The crucifixion of Jesus by the material agents God used...was a sinful act. For Peter to say they also "slew" him was to suggest murder. This argument does nothing to justify the Death penalty.
The argument for the Death penalty rests clearly and un-challenged by Genesis chapter 9 and even the implication that it was justified by Cain's murder of Abel and the injunction spoken there and repeated by the Apostle Paul. But this line of argument is non-sequitor.
What exactly does "universal rule" mean? Is that an "absolute rule" that must be exercised on every occasion?
In Gen. 9, God stated that whoever sheds blood (commits murder?, homicide?, manslaughter?) He will require that person's blood by another man. You say it is a "universal rule", but what exactly does it mean?
The text does not specifically say "murder" as we understand it today. It doesn't even say "thou shalt not kill". It says "sheds blood".
Gen. 9 is most likely a reference to the ancient near east practice of the "blood avenger".