convicted1
Guest
Now you guys are just gettin' weird.
![]()
doodoodoooodooooddooooo <---------theme music from Twilight Zone....
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Now you guys are just gettin' weird.
![]()
yup, we're Raiders fans....as weird as they get....GO RAIDERS!!!
BTW, Bush inked a 4/14 deal w/ da Bears, 7 mill guaranteed...:tear:
doodoodoooodooooddooooo <---------theme music from Twilight Zone....
I am sorry to disagree. God placed the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden and allowed Satan to tempt Adam and Eve to enable love. They could have chosen to obey God and love him if they wanted to, but they believed Satan's lie and chose to disobey.
If God had not put the tree in the garden with a commandment not to eat of it, then there could be no possibility of obedience. But to obey there must also exist the possibility to disobey, one cannot exist without the other.
It was just as much an opportunity to obey and love God as it was to disobey in the garden. God did not tempt Adam and Eve, he had sternly warned them that if they ate of the tree they would surely die. This is not a temptation, it is a WARNING.
Aw shucks......**snapped fingers** as I said "aw shucks"
I am sorry to disagree. The scriptures say God is LOVE.
1 Jhn 4:7 Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.
8 He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
God is love, and he cannot deny himself. He MUST give us choice, without choice love is impossible. You cannot force anyone to love you, it cannot be done, even by God. But God does not desire to force or compel us to love him. He commands it because it is right, but we have the choice to obey or disobey. It must be so, for without choice there can be no love. Without choice there can be no obedience.
We are commanded to love one another, we are not forced or compelled. It is a willing choice, an act of obedience. We are not robots, neither does God want robots, he wants people who willingly love him and willingly choose to obey his commandments.
You do realize the heretical nature of this statement. You just denied the omnipotence and sovereignty of God.That portion of your statement I highlighted in red is where I believe Reformed/Calvinist theology goes off the tracks. In fact, God cannot stop sin.
That means they have a purpose, not that they cannot be pervented. That's outright denying God's sovereignty.Jesus said that offenses "must needs be". They cannot be prevented, even by God.
Calvinist would believe that God is in control and man is free to make autonomous decisions and actions. you should know this. However, this doesn't change that you said that God is unable to prevent sin.Reformed/Calvinist theology overemphasizes the sovereignty of God. God is in control, but man is free to make autonomous decisions and actions.
Denying God's sovereignty. God could have stopped sin. he will stop sin.God could prevent sin by killing us before we are born, but then he could not have fellowship with us. If he allows us to exist so that we might have fellowship with him, then necessarily there is the possibility we will sin and reject him. Of course, we ALL do sin. It cannot be avoided.
so i guess we will be "mindless robots" in heaven.Mat 18:7 Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!
I personally do not believe God could make us mindless robots who never sin, because it is immoral to enslave a person. It is the devil who seeks to enslave people.
2 Tim 2:26 And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
It is the devil who lays a snare for us and seeks to take us captive. He wants us to be his robots and slaves. God wants us to be free, but to willingly love him in freedom. Paul said he was a slave to Christ in many of his books. But yes, the devil wants us to sin.
Way off topic now. You have a major problem with the top portion. You may want to rethink the wording of your post. Pretend I'm not a Calvinist and look at it. Don't just disagree with me because I'm a "calvinist."Jhn 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.
God is not about making folks captives and slaves, he is about making men free. You love God because you want to of your own free will and choice. This is where Reformed/Calvinist doctrine is all wrong.
Heretical according to whom? You? You should think twice before you judge others, what if turns out you are wrong and they are correct?You do realize the heretical nature of this statement. You just denied the omnipotence and sovereignty of God.
That means they have a purpose, not that they cannot be pervented. That's outright denying God's sovereignty.
Calvinist would believe that God is in control and man is free to make autonomous decisions and actions. you should know this. However, this doesn't change that you said that God is unable to prevent sin.
Denying God's sovereignty. God could have stopped sin. he will stop sin.
so i guess we will be "mindless robots" in heaven.
Paul said he was a slave to Christ in many of his books. But yes, the devil wants us to sin.
I have probably given this far more thought than you. Jesus said he would make us free, not slaves. Free means you obey because you desire to obey of your own free will, not compelled or forced to obey. Look up the definition of "free".Way off topic now. You have a major problem with the top portion. You may want to rethink the wording of your post. Pretend I'm not a Calvinist and look at it. Don't just disagree with me because I'm a "calvinist."
What about Sodom and Gomorrah? Did God destroy people who had never sinned? What about the flood? Did God destroy people who had never sinned? Was He unjust?Not if he has given men free will, which you cannot seem to grasp. He could kill a man before he sins, but that would be unjust. Therefore a man must be able to sin. He could then justly kill the man and stop further sin.
The bibleHeretical according to whom? You?
I'm not judging you first of all. Second I can judge you based on your words. Third, I was attempting to be kind and give you a chance to change your statement since it appeared to be heretical. You said, " In fact, God cannot stop sin." Which denies God's sovereignty if God "can't"(meaning unable) to stop something.You should think twice before you judge others, what if turns out you are wrong and they are correct?
You denied it when you said that something was not possible for God to do. You denied God's omnipotence when you said there was something God "can't" do.I do not deny God's omnipotence or sovereignty, I just understand it differently than you.
Hmmm...sound EXACTLY like what I said. I said that they are part of God's plan and purpose to get what he wants done, yet he hates sin. What I'm hoping that you are not meaning is that the "must needs be" are from outside of God. That is where a problem will be.No, Jesus said offenses "must needs be". They are necessary. The word "must" shows they must occur. God never desires sin to occur, but it must occur.
God is always in control doesn't equal God always making every decision. nothing is outside of God's control.As usual, your statement is a contradiction and cannot be true. If man makes autonomous decisions and actions, then God is not in control of these autonomous decisions and actions, men are doing these of their own free will.
Man is under God's control. (period) You have portrayed a God that is not sovereign. He wants man do do something, but is unable to get it done. now I do believe God allows man to do things, but it's still God allowing the event to be done, not that God is unable to stop him.But I do believe God can keep man under control easily. It is like a game of chess, my opponent moves where he wills, but to a great degree (if I am a good player) I can control or influence his moves. Still, within the options available, my opponent can move where he wills.
First, I can grasp free will. . Second, you are denying that God is omnipotent and sovereign right here. This is very false. God could have stopped evil(otherwise he isn't sovereign) God will stop evil. Unless of course you believe there will be evil in heaven.Not if he has given men free will, which you cannot seem to grasp. He could kill a man before he sins, but that would be unjust. Therefore a man must be able to sin. He could then justly kill the man and stop further sin.
i'm sure there are, but what does this have to do with what you said.Some folks are mindless now.
We will never sin in heaven, so therefore we must be "mindless robots" in heaven according to your statement.I personally do not believe God could make us mindless robots who never sin, because it is immoral to enslave a person. It is the devil who seeks to enslave people.
Of course, but Paul said he was a slave to God. We all have a master. It's either the devil or God. No man can serve two masters. That doesn't man that Paul was serving God unwillingly. Don't confuse "slave" with that which we had here in America.Paul was a WILLING servant. He was not compelled or forced to serve God, he desired to. As a Christian you are not compelled or forced to obey either, you can disobey if you so choose. No?
Any reason for the Ad hominem? Let's keep this civil shall we? You have no clue as to how much thought I've put into this. I've been very gracious to you as I've given you a chance to pull back your heretical statement and explain it.I have probably given this far more thought than you.
Ok, but again, you are way off topic. I don't believe people obey unwillingly. I've never said that nor ever believed that.Jesus said he would make us free, not slaves. Free means you obey because you desire to obey of your own free will, not compelled or forced to obey. Look up the definition of "free".
The bibleI'm not judging you first of all. Second I can judge you based on your words. Third, I was attempting to be kind and give you a chance to change your statement since it appeared to be heretical. You said, " In fact, God cannot stop sin." Which denies God's sovereignty if God "can't"(meaning unable) to stop something.
You denied it when you said that something was not possible for God to do. You denied God's omnipotence when you said there was something God "can't" do.
Hmmm...sound EXACTLY like what I said. I said that they are part of God's plan and purpose to get what he wants done, yet he hates sin. What I'm hoping that you are not meaning is that the "must needs be" are from outside of God. That is where a problem will be.
God is always in control doesn't equal God always making every decision. nothing is outside of God's control. Man is under God's control. (period) You have portrayed a God that is not sovereign. He wants man do do something, but is unable to get it done. now I do believe God allows man to do things, but it's still God allowing the event to be done, not that God is unable to stop him.
First, I can grasp free will. . Second, you are denying that God is omnipotent and sovereign right here. This is very false. God could have stopped evil(otherwise he isn't sovereign) God will stop evil. Unless of course you believe there will be evil in heaven.
i'm sure there are, but what does this have to do with what you said. We will never sin in heaven, so therefore we must be "mindless robots" in heaven according to your statement.
Of course, but Paul said he was a slave to God. We all have a master. It's either the devil or God. No man can serve two masters. That doesn't man that Paul was serving God unwillingly. Don't confuse "slave" with that which we had here in America.
Any reason for the Ad hominem? Let's keep this civil shall we? You have no clue as to how much thought I've put into this. I've been very gracious to you as I've given you a chance to pull back your heretical statement and explain it. Ok, but again, you are way off topic. I don't believe people obey unwillingly. I've never said that nor ever believed that.
But let's get back to the point. You have made the claim that "God cannot stop sin." That denies God's sovereignty and omnipotence. If God is unable to do something, then he isn't sovereign. Second, this statement would mean that God will never defeat evil. Satan would win.
I'm trying to be kind to you the best I can. You seem to be taking free will to heretical levels. Don't be so eager to disagree with me. Anyone can take doctrine too far(like hyper calvinist). I'm trying to keep you from doing that.
JBH, though I agree with you with regarding to be cautious about saying what God "cannot" do, is it "incorrect" to say that there is anything God "cannot" do? I.E. Is it incorrect in your mind to say that God "cannot" sin? I feel confident that you would agree. Perhaps, it would have been better for WM to say that God "will not" stop sin. Is that more acceptable?
God "cannot sin" because it's against God's nature to sin, not that something outside of God keeps him from sinning.
True, God hasn't stopped sin and currently will not stop sin, but in the future will stop sin. God doesn't lack the ability to stop sin. God will in the future stop sin.
The bible
I'm not judging you first of all. Second I can judge you based on your words.
Third, I was attempting to be kind and give you a chance to change your statement since it appeared to be heretical. You said, " In fact, God cannot stop sin." Which denies God's sovereignty if God "can't"(meaning unable) to stop something.
You denied it when you said that something was not possible for God to do. You denied God's omnipotence when you said there was something God "can't" do.
Hmmm...sound EXACTLY like what I said. I said that they are part of God's plan and purpose to get what he wants done, yet he hates sin. What I'm hoping that you are not meaning is that the "must needs be" are from outside of God. That is where a problem will be.
God is always in control doesn't equal God always making every decision. nothing is outside of God's control. Man is under God's control. (period) You have portrayed a God that is not sovereign. He wants man do do something, but is unable to get it done. now I do believe God allows man to do things, but it's still God allowing the event to be done, not that God is unable to stop him.
First, I can grasp free will. . Second, you are denying that God is omnipotent and sovereign right here. This is very false. God could have stopped evil(otherwise he isn't sovereign) God will stop evil. Unless of course you believe there will be evil in heaven.
i'm sure there are, but what does this have to do with what you said. We will never sin in heaven, so therefore we must be "mindless robots" in heaven according to your statement.
Of course, but Paul said he was a slave to God. We all have a master. It's either the devil or God. No man can serve two masters. That doesn't man that Paul was serving God unwillingly. Don't confuse "slave" with that which we had here in America.
Any reason for the Ad hominem? Let's keep this civil shall we? You have no clue as to how much thought I've put into this. I've been very gracious to you as I've given you a chance to pull back your heretical statement and explain it. Ok, but again, you are way off topic. I don't believe people obey unwillingly. I've never said that nor ever believed that.
But let's get back to the point. You have made the claim that "God cannot stop sin." That denies God's sovereignty and omnipotence. If God is unable to do something, then he isn't sovereign. Second, this statement would mean that God will never defeat evil. Satan would win.
I'm trying to be kind to you the best I can. You seem to be taking free will to heretical levels. Don't be so eager to disagree with me. Anyone can take doctrine too far(like hyper calvinist). I'm trying to keep you from doing that.
possibility of obedience.
Do you not find it incredibly mind blowing out of the billions of humans not one other than Jesus, has been obedient to God? Not one. What does that tell you about your free will?
Possibility? 0 to 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
You get the idea.
Sorry, but I've tried to help you not go done this heretical path. I think you are a good person, but are being mislead somehow to go down this path. You are placing Free will over God's sovereignty.Not so, there are examples in the scriptures where God could not prevent something.
It doesn't say the Children wouldn't come. Read it again. I'm also guessing you are officially denying the sovereignty of God. Just let me know. I don't want to falsely accuse you. Now, don't say you believe in God's sovereignty and then deny it in your words.Mat 23:37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Was it God's desire to gather the children of Jerusalem to him as a hen gathers it's chicks? YES. But they wouldn't come to God would they? NO.
Oh, what a powerless God! I guess we will have sin in heaven then correct?Men have free will, and if men have free will you cannot prevent them from sinning. Oh, you could kill them before they have a chance to sin, but that would be unjust. The wages of SIN is death.
Of course, as I explained above. It's God and his nature, not someone from the outside limiting God.There are many things God cannot do, he cannot tell a lie.
You didn't read that correctly. I said I'm not judging you, but I can judge you if I want to. BIG difference. I'm simply trying to help you out. You're going down a dangerous path in defense of free will. You are placing man's free will over God's sovereignty.Your specialty, a contradiction.
Then 1)God is not sovereign, 2) sin will be in heavenIf men indeed have a free will and can make their own autonomous decisions and choices, then sin cannot be prevented, even by God.
not at all, but I've only explained it a million times. But thanks for the heads up on denying God's sovereignty... again.See, you are stuck. If God is in complete control as you insist, then you must conclude that God makes men sin. It is that simple.
Sin can be prevented. There will be no sin in heaven.I do not believe that, I believe God gave man (and angels) the ability to make their own autonomous choices, therefore sin cannot be prevented.
Not at all. As I stated above(and have many times) no one outside of God keeps God from telling a lie. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!God can't tell a lie, so there goes your concept of God's omnipotence down the drain.
I believe that sin will be defeated. I believe God is sovereign over sin. I believe that sin "must needs be" for the purpose of God, not that he couldn't' prevent it.Jesus did not say offenses (sin) are an option, he said they MUST NEEDS BE. They are necessary, they cannot be avoided. And if you believe God gives man the ability to make his own autonomous free choices, then you must agree that sin cannot be avoided.
man is sinning on his own. God is sovereign over the situation and allows man to commit the sin.When man sins, he is either doing it on his own, or God is making him do it.
Very good!Look, I have debated with you many times, I know you never attribute sin to God.
Ok winman, I see what you are saying. The problem is that you say "cannot be prevented" which is false. It could be prevented. There will be no sin in heaven. Satan will be cast in the lake of fire and sin will be defeated forever!You say that all men have free will, and that they will always choose to follow their greatest desire, which is to sin. So sin cannot be prevented in your view as well, unless God kills a man before he has a chance to sin.
That's not what the passage says. The "will not" is not about the children.God wanted to gather the children of Jerusalem as a hen gathers her chicks and could not get it done. Why? Because the children of Jerusalem were free agents and would not come to God.
well duh! It already happened.God can stop evil after it occurs,
oh really? No, he can. God is sovereign. You don't do anything unless God allows you to do it.he cannot stop a free agent from sinning.
true???He cannot justly condemn an innocent man.
So sin will no longer be. you won't be a slave. you will have free will..... hmmmm So sin can be prevented.I believe men make the choice NOW whether they want to be holy or evil. In heaven we will not have a corruptible body to tempt us, and we will not be in an environment that will tempt us. We already have the Holy Spirit and are partakers of the divine nature and will not desire to sin.
I don't disagree. I was picking in you by your usage of the term "slave." I agree that Paul was a willing slave of Christ.Paul CHOSE to be obedient.
Acts 26:19 Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
Paul's very statement implies that he COULD HAVE been disobedient.
I didn't mean to do that at all.You implied I had not given thought to this subject.
Praise the Lord!...and yesI accepted Christ around 48 years ago, which is probably far longer than you have been alive.
Yes, but that doesn't mean much in a debate as far as the fact of it.I assure you I have been thinking about subjects like this a long time, probably FAR longer than you.
Again, more ad hominems. Let's not get cocky. You words have denied God's sovereignty. You put free will up so high as if God is unable to get things done that he wants to get done. It doesn't matter how long you have studied if you are wrong. Wrong is as wrong with 1 year of study as it is with 50 years of study.You want to talk like a smart kid, I responded to you in kind. You are not difficult to refute, as smart as you believe yourself to be.
correct, never said it did.Free will does not deny God's omnipotence or sovereignty.
Ok not a bad example. You have sovereity over the choices of your children. You allow them to choose, but could overrule if need be.I give my kids choices all the time. They can choose what they want for supper. I could always overrule them, but almost never do.
Exactly. Their choices could be prevented if you wanted, correct.I have given them this freedom to exercise. I am still in control. But I cannot decide for them what they want, that is their choice.
Sin can be prevented. You showed why you believe sin will be prevented in heaven when we have our glorified bodies. So sin can be prevented. God uses sin to accomplish his will. He hates sin, but uses it for his own good.Man is either deciding for himself to sin, or God is doing it for him. If you agree that men are making their own free decisions, then sin cannot be prevented, that is what men will choose to do.
I find the exact opposite to be true. Adam and Eve were created without sin in a perfect environment with only one single law and sinned the very first time they were tempted.
We are born into an utterly corrupt world with thousands of temptations and many laws to break. I do not find it unusual that all men sin at one time or another.
What I find incredible and truly blows my mind is that Jesus could live as a man in this world for 33 years and never sin once. Now THAT blows my mind.
It is God in his sovereignty that gave all men the ability to make choices of his own. Free will exists because God gave man free will. God's sovereignty is not usurped by free will, it is established. It is similar to our laws, a minor is not able to enter into legal contracts. This is to protect the minor. But once they reach the age of majoritiy, the law gives a person the right to enter into contracts. The law is sovereign, but the law establishes and enforces the law of majority.Sorry, but I've tried to help you not go done this heretical path. I think you are a good person, but are being mislead somehow to go down this path. You are placing Free will over God's sovereignty.
It doesn't say the Children wouldn't come. Read it again. I'm also guessing you are officially denying the sovereignty of God. Just let me know. I don't want to falsely accuse you. Now, don't say you believe in God's sovereignty and then deny it in your words.
Oh, what a powerless God! I guess we will have sin in heaven then correct?
Of course, as I explained above. It's God and his nature, not someone from the outside limiting God.
You didn't read that correctly. I said I'm not judging you, but I can judge you if I want to. BIG difference. I'm simply trying to help you out. You're going down a dangerous path in defense of free will. You are placing man's free will over God's sovereignty.
Then 1)God is not sovereign, 2) sin will be in heaven
not at all, but I've only explained it a million times. But thanks for the heads up on denying God's sovereignty... again.
Sin can be prevented. There will be no sin in heaven.
Not at all. As I stated above(and have many times) no one outside of God keeps God from telling a lie. BIG DIFFERENCE!!!
I believe that sin will be defeated. I believe God is sovereign over sin. I believe that sin "must needs be" for the purpose of God, not that he couldn't' prevent it.
man is sinning on his own. God is sovereign over the situation and allows man to commit the sin.
Very good!
Ok winman, I see what you are saying. The problem is that you say "cannot be prevented" which is false. It could be prevented. There will be no sin in heaven. Satan will be cast in the lake of fire and sin will be defeated forever!
That's not what the passage says. The "will not" is not about the children.
well duh! It already happened.oh really? No, he can. God is sovereign. You don't do anything unless God allows you to do it. true???
So sin will no longer be. you won't be a slave. you will have free will..... hmmmm So sin can be prevented.
I don't disagree. I was picking in you by your usage of the term "slave." I agree that Paul was a willing slave of Christ.
I didn't mean to do that at all. Praise the Lord!...and yesYes, but that doesn't mean much in a debate as far as the fact of it. Again, more ad hominems. Let's not get cocky. You words have denied God's sovereignty. You put free will up so high as if God is unable to get things done that he wants to get done. It doesn't matter how long you have studied if you are wrong. Wrong is as wrong with 1 year of study as it is with 50 years of study.
correct, never said it did. Ok not a bad example. You have sovereity over the choices of your children. You allow them to choose, but could overrule if need be. Exactly. Their choices could be prevented if you wanted, correct.![]()
Sin can be prevented. You showed why you believe sin will be prevented in heaven when we have our glorified bodies. So sin can be prevented. God uses sin to accomplish his will. He hates sin, but uses it for his own good.