jasonlevene
New Member
If not, then why did he ask God the Father to nullify Isaiah 53 and Psalm 22 by taking the cup/cross away from him?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But wouldn't you agree that Jesus desired evil in that he wanted God the Father to cancel the prophecies requiring him to go through his suffering (take this cup away from me)?Originally posted by Brother Ian:
Jesus would have preferred another way. Who wants to die a gruesome and painful death? But....Jesus put aside His desire for the Father's.
Matthew 26:39, "And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt."
There was never a doubt He would go to the cross and therefore never a chance to nullify the prophecy in Genesis 3.
There's nothing in those prophecies that states that Jesus couldn't desire another way if possible. Conflicting desires are not necessarily evil.Originally posted by jasonlevene:
But wouldn't you agree that Jesus desired evil in that he wanted God the Father to cancel the prophecies requiring him to go through his suffering (take this cup away from me)?
There's nothing in those prophecies that states that Jesus couldn't desire another way if possible. Conflicting desires are not necessarily evil.Originally posted by whatever:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by jasonlevene:
But wouldn't you agree that Jesus desired evil in that he wanted God the Father to cancel the prophecies requiring him to go through his suffering (take this cup away from me)?
I disagree. According to James 1:14-15 it is only when one gratifies an evil desire that one becomes a sinner.Originally posted by canadyjd:
To say that Jesus desired evil is going much too far. That would have made Him sinful.
I disagree. According to James 1:14-15 it is only when one gratifies an evil desire that one becomes a sinner. </font>[/QUOTE]Be sure you let Jesus know that lusting after a woman in your heart isn't really a sin unless you gratify those desires. I'm sure He will want to modify that sermon of His, and maybe issue an apology. (It might make a lot of us sleep a little better too.)Originally posted by jasonlevene:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by canadyjd:
To say that Jesus desired evil is going much too far. That would have made Him sinful.
If He hadn't included that part about "nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will" in verse 39 and "your will be done" in verse 42 then maybe you might have something to work with. But He did, so you don't.Originally posted by jasonlevene:
In the case with Gethsemane however, Jesus acknowledged that it was the Father's will for him to drink of that cup (Matt. 26:42). And by his asking for that cup to have been taken away from him, he was asking for the nullification of the Father's will. And the nullification of YHWH altogether.
If He hadn't included that part about "nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will" in verse 39 and "your will be done" in verse 42 then maybe you might have something to work with. But He did, so you don't.Originally posted by whatever:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by jasonlevene:
In the case with Gethsemane however, Jesus acknowledged that it was the Father's will for him to drink of that cup (Matt. 26:42). And by his asking for that cup to have been taken away from him, he was asking for the nullification of the Father's will. And the nullification of YHWH altogether.
I disagree with this interpretation because Jesus said in Matthew 26:42 that 'if this cup can not pass away from me unless I drink it, thy will be done.' So if the cup were a premature death in Gethsemane, then he was accepting the fact that God's will required him to drink of the cup...or die prematurely in Gethsemane. This can not be the case.Originally posted by John of Japan:
There is an old and honored interpretation going back to Dionysius (c. 190-c. 264), a church father, that Jesus was not praying in the Garden to be delivered from the cup of death on the cross, but from a premature cup of death in the Garden.
There is also the theory that the resurrection was the answer to His prayers(3) Hebrews 5:7: "Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared." This could only refer to the prayers in the Garden. He prayed to be delivered from death in the Garden, and was heard.
When I showed God doing it you got around it by saying it was an anthropomorphism. So I showed Paul doing it (under inspiration of the Holy Spirit) so you'd have to address the question. And to your credit, you did.Originally posted by jasonlevene:
I don't see what Paul's wishes have to do with anthropomophisms.
I don't think what Peter did in his ignorance is in any way comparable to what Paul wished for his kinsmen. I strongly disagree with your conclusion.But as to your question. Peter wanted to prevent Jesus from going to Jerusalem and getting killed. Now on the surface that appears like a noble desire...to prevent the murder of one's friend but what did Jesus say to Peter? 'Get thee behind me Satan' (Matt. 16:21-23). Why? Because not killing Jesus would have meant the nullification of the prophecies requiring his death. So did Paul desire evil by wishing that Israel accept the Messiah against God's will? The answer is yes.
At some level He did, but not ultimately, because He did ultimately obey His Father. What I am saying is that it is not necessarily evil to desire that something happen even though God has decreed that it will not happen.And I don't see how Jesus' words 'nevertheless not my will but your's be done' conflict with the fact that he wanted the Father's will nullified so he could have been spared of the cross.
I mean don't you agree that he wanted the Father's will (that he drink of the cup) nullified in asking that the cup be taken away from him?
I disagree with this interpretation because Jesus said in Matthew 26:42 that 'if this cup can not pass away from me unless I drink it, thy will be done.' So if the cup were a premature death in Gethsemane, then he was accepting the fact that God's will required him to drink of the cup...or die prematurely in Gethsemane. This can not be the case. </font>[/QUOTE]But He did say "this cup," meaning the cup he was facing right then, not "the cup," which would mean death on the cross. And if was a conditional clause beginning with the Greek word "ei," meaning "if," not "since I must drink the cup."Originally posted by jasonlevene:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by John of Japan:
There is an old and honored interpretation going back to Dionysius (c. 190-c. 264), a church father, that Jesus was not praying in the Garden to be delivered from the cup of death on the cross, but from a premature cup of death in the Garden.