Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Wit is one thing. Cracking jokes is another.Yes. In the passage where he calls Peter a rock he uses two words for rock with different meanings. This shows humor.
Also the play on words in "And why do you look at the speck in your brother's eye, but do not perceive the plank in your own eye" shows both seriousness and humor.
I believe Christ had a perfect sense of humor.
If you can get your hands on a copy read Elton Trueblood's The Humor of Christ. It is quite a good book.
I totally disagree with the opinion that Jesus never told a joke. First of all, God created a sense of humor in us to enjoy when done properly. It is one of those things in life that we were meant to enjoy in the proper way. CTB has the right idea for the type of humor, probably to emphasize a spiritual lesson or a parable. Our Lord never used inappropriate humor. You would never have heard an opening line that said, "Did you hear the one about the Holy Spirit and the Pharisee.......".... crack a joke to any of His audiences?
Having said all of that, one can understand why people with no sense of humor would think Jesus did not have one either.
I was not singling out any one person for a lack of humor, just a general observation. You certainly have a sense of humor. Anyone who likes Looney Tunes is not all bad.Why?????????????
I was not singling out any one person for a lack of humor, just a general observation. You certainly have a sense of humor. Anyone who likes Looney Tunes is not all bad.
Seems some folks replying to you can't discern the difference between wit and the modern notion of humor. What do you mean, "crack a joke?".... crack a joke to any of His audiences?
.... crack a joke to any of His audiences?
Just curious where it said he got sick??No, clearly no. You see, I prefer the removed, detached, unemotional Jesus that always spoke prophetically and never actually communed with His disciples. This is a far better Jesus for my theology and to justify my own stuffiness.
In fact we should banish this whole idea of a Jesus who: had bowel movements, got sick, hung out with sinners, hung with really bad sinners, played in the mud, wrestled with others, told funny jokes, laughed at funny jokes, laughed, ate rotted meat, drank bad wine, touched sinners, healed sinners, etc.
...yes, I'm being ironic...:thumbs:
Just curious where it said he got sick??
Surprised you didn't add wet dreams to the list.played in the mud, wrestled with others, told funny jokes, laughed at funny jokes, laughed, ate rotted meat, drank bad wine
Surprised you didn't add wet dreams to the list.
This is the Christ of your imagination, not of Scripture. The one you prefer, not the One presented.
Just sayin'.
Don't you imagine that His feet got sore and blistery? Or that He might have eaten something that disagreed with His digestive track and He might have gotten nauseous and thrown up? ...
Why do you think that because Jesus was sinless that He was exempt from physical illness?
Actually, Jesus could not have been the "pure lamb" if his innards were not pure, if he had blisters and sores that were scar baring. He was more pure than the "pure lambs" of the OT sacrifice who were set aside for days and repeatedly inspected for purity.
Jesus wouldn't have had an acne problem, had cavities and certainly didn't wear contacts.
“For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your forefathers, but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect. He was chosen before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake. Through him you believe in God, who raised him from the dead and glorified him, and so your faith and hope are in God.”
Actually, Jesus could not have been the "pure lamb" if his innards were not pure, if he had blisters and sores that were scar baring. He was more pure than the "pure lambs" of the OT sacrifice who were set aside for days and repeatedly inspected for purity.
Jesus wouldn't have had an acne problem, had cavities and certainly didn't wear contacts.
"An absent-minded professor is asked by a friend to bring back two 15-year-old slave boys from his trip abroad, and replies "fine, and if I can't find two 15-year-olds I will bring you one 30-year-old,"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/mar/13/roman-joke-book-beard