• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dilbert cancelled

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I made no such claim. You seemed to had bailed out of the conversation after repeatedly falsely attacking me without engaging in anything I have written.

I have never believed such a thing and have clearly and specifically rejected that point of view in this discussion. It is simply a false accusation.

I did not understand it since you didn't clearly tie it to anything. Are you aware that I can't read minds?

No, I've been trying to get you to agree that we shouldn't support bullies, liars, and thugs (an off-topic claim you made -- without evidence -- that only left-wingers "cancel" people and institutions).

Have you noticed that you were the one who first made me the focus of the discussion -- "Yet another advocate of Democrats remaining in office." (a misrepresentation of my views)?

When you don't rationally engage in a conversation; accuse me of the things you are doing; and go silent for 36 hours when I press you to take a basic ethic stance; it's a reasonable assumption that you have bailed out.

Since you are so engaged now, tell me, do you support bullies, liars, and thugs?

Again, this should be an easy answer. If you start talking about "the Left" again, it's clear your ethics are strictly partisan.
1) Attributing my position without quoting where I said it is mind reading.
2) You falsely attacked me, not the other way around.
3) BB claims not to understand how saying the right has problems to justify the left is ludicrous
4) BB says no, then addresses my behavior. I kid you not...
5) BB posted this, "The Right has plenty of those too. Don't vote for bullies, liars, and thugs no matter what political persuasion they represent." And my response was "Yet another advocate for Democrats remaining in office. The statement was about not voting for the Left.
6) Now BB says He posted a reasonable assumption that my behavior was flawed. I kid you not yet again.
7) Then BB returns to an effort to change the subject to my views. I kid you not.
8) Lastly he implies by ethics are partisan. And somehow he did not discuss that the Left is making America lousy.
 
Top