Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So - what? Your topic is supposed to be about, one of the people was already a convicted petty thief? So we don't care about the former policeman, or the federal employee? Or the optometrist? We don't care about the lawyer? Or the relatives? Each of whom are just as guilty of taking advantage of disabled vets?Clarification is in the OP topic
read the OP topic and article
So - what? Your topic is supposed to be about, one of the people was already a convicted petty thief? So we don't care about the former policeman, or the federal employee? Or the optometrist? We don't care about the lawyer? Or the relatives? Each of whom are just as guilty of taking advantage of disabled vets?
Was your point supposed to be about the VA approving a convicted felon? Or the lax oversight of the VA over the fiduciary program? (which was the point of the article)
See, this is the same as the other thread, where we finally cleared up your position regarding the politicians/leaders who use the military, as opposed to the military. If you'd just assume that people don't understand what you're saying, and work on communicating yourself clearly, it would go a long way towards having meaningful, productive conversations/debates.
Are we to assume you don't know what your own OP topic is?Clarification is in the OP topic
read the OP topic and article
Clarification is in the OP topicAre we to assume you don't know what your own OP topic is?