David Lamb
Well-Known Member
May I ask in what sense do you find the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith "philosophical"?I then suggest you start with rejecting the 1689 LBC. (snip)
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
May I ask in what sense do you find the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith "philosophical"?I then suggest you start with rejecting the 1689 LBC. (snip)
May I ask in what sense do you find the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith "philosophical"?
I then suggest you start with rejecting the 1689 LBC.
And I believe you think that truth it has been unfolded by the 1689 LBC.
Again you refer to the 1689 LBC
Leveled at the issue he raised, my man. There is a post (#33) waiting for you which you should examine closely and take note of and learn from before you start trying to use philosphical terms. It was merely geared to expose the methods that you continually use rather than directly engage in the premise. But glad to see you jumping in there with some attempts to at least begin to recognize the differences.
Wiccans!?!....Noooooooo Waaaaaaayyyyyy!!!:tongue3:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12strings
That's your prerogative, I just don't know if it's accurate to say that those men who DO agree with large portions of calvinism simply need more bible study to "widen" their understanding of scripture.
by MARKE:
I will exercise my perogative, then, to also point out the fact that wisdom comes from God and no amount of study will ever open the eyes of anyone not meeting the conditions of humility, subjection, purity, etc. The biggest stumblingblock to Bible scholors, I think, is not realizing the depth of their ignorance, sin, and inability to understand truth apart from revelation from God.
Wiccans!?!....Noooooooo Waaaaaaayyyyyy!!!:tongue3:
Sorry to press the point a bit further, But it seems you are now saying that if a person accepts a Calvinistic understanding of soteriology, then the following things are true about him:
1. He needs a wider understanding of scripture
2. He is not humble
3. He is not subjecting himself to scripture
4. He is not pure. (of course, none of us are)
5. He does not realize the depth of his ignorance, sin, and inability to understand truth apart form revelation from God.
Have I correctly described your view of Calvinists?
I believe the calvinist view is based on a combination of scriptures which falls short of the whole counsel fo God, yes. I believe that we all start out as newborn Christians with very little understanding of the scriptures and must learn what they teach through the processes of learning which are available through God-given teachers and preachers, personal Bible study, and prayer, to list the main instruments of God.
God gives wisdom and understanding, but not all at once. Bible teachers and preachers are also subject to error, which forces us to seek God for right understanding and discernment. If we do not apply ourselves diligently to the things of God, seeking His face and guidance in doing the will of God, and humbling ourselves before Him, then we may end up stuck on error at some level of our growth.
What I'm saying about Calvinism, Arminianism, or other errors of Bible doctrine, is that the reason people are stuck on these errors is because they have not matured past those things and there may be some problem in their walk with God that is hindering their growth in wisdom and understanding. That principle holds true for me also, I believe. If I am wrong about Calvinism, then my problem is with God, since He is not getting through to me with the correction that I need.
I do pray to God for wisdom and correction, but that is no guarantee that I am right. Nevertheless, all of us think we are right (Prov. 21:2), and that can't be helped. If we ever thought we were wrong, then we would instantly change and we would again think we were right. It is up to each of us individually to try to improve our walking relationship with God so He can straighten us out if we need correction.
This Westminster confession is an interesting contradiction.
4.2 After God had made all other creatures, he created human beings, male and female, with reasoning and immortal souls, making them fitted for that life for God for which they were created. They were made in the image of God, with knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness.
9.2 In his state of innocence, Adam had freedom and power to will and to do what was good and well-pleasing to God; but he was unstable so that he might fall from this condition.
Definition of UNSTABLE
: not stable : not firm or fixed : not constant
not steady in action or movement :
irregular wavering in purpose or intent :
lacking steadiness : apt to move, sway, or fall
characterized by lack of emotional control
Comparing the two statements, this tells me Adam was created in the image and likeness of God,
with knowledge but is unstable,
who is righteous but is unstable,
is in true holiness but is unstable.
Since Adam was created in God's likeness, it tells me
God is Holy but unstable,
God has all knowledge but is unstable,
and God is righteous but unstable.
If that is not twisted enough, we now are taught that God intended Adam to fall from this "unstable perfection". A perfection that God has placed a built in failure switch to sin. Interesting.
God: "Adam, don't eat from that tree in the midst of the garden. If you do, you will die. I love you and trust you, I let you name the creatures, I want you to multiply and subdue the earth, so I don't want you to die."
Adam: "Ok Lord."
God: "Adam, about that ability I gave you to choose...."
Adam: "Yes Lord?"
God: "Well, you are going to disobey me. You know that tree in the midst?"
Adam:" Yes Lord, I won't eat from it."
God: "Well you are going to eat from it, and there isn't a thing you can do about it. The thing is Adam, there is a serpent in the garden and he is going to lie to you about the tree, and you are going to believe him."
Adam: "But Lord my eyes are on you, and you said the wife and I will die if we eat. Do I still have a choice?"
God: "No son, I can't trust you because of the way I created you. You're unstable. It's for My glory, you'll understand later."
Adam: "What about the children Eve and I will have Lord, you know, to multiply?"
God: "It's going to be tough for them because of your disobedience Adam. Some of them will be saved, but alot of them will reject me and will end up in Hell."
Adam: "But Lord I have not disobeyed you."
God: "Oh you will disobey Adam, I've made you unstable."
Genesis 1
26 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: ......" But he will be unstable so he might fall and die.
27 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." So they will fall and die.
31 "And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good......" Except that he will be unstable so he might fall and die.
Job 8:20 "Behold, God will not cast away a perfect man, neither will he help the evil doers:" Except Adam, who I will cast away, and all his children, on purpose, because I created him unstable. Sorry kids.
The Sovereignty of God is summed up in one verse:
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Genesis 1:1
So ben, you learned calvinism on a live chat one day via a wiccan priest? Wow. It sounds to me like an episode from "Talk Back With Bob Larson" and just as credible. What an exhaustive and comprehensive grasp you must now have? Did the "wiccan priest" who allegedly chatted with you and taught you these things email you your diploma?
An alleged wiccan priest? Please. Wiccans reject the idea of Christianity due to one major fact: that it claims to be the only way. This teaching they despise and reject.
A wiccan calvinist?
OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt...
Excellent response Iconoclast. You were clearly misrepresented again by ben. He's playing pretend. Here's yet another pretending quote of his, justifying himself for name calling and pejorative attitude (calling another a hypocrite and ignorant) to which I called him on, and to which he responded here:
First and foremost, I'm not your man.
Secondly, the insult was leveled at a person, not at an issue, thus the name calling. See?
As to your last sentence, stop pretending. No one has jumped in there to learn a thing from you, nor should a person.
Each of your posts are off track and misrepresentations. Furthermore, the fact that your philosophy denies the truth concerning Sovereignty, the Omnis of God, and the Biblical state of lost mankind, seeing these glaring deficiencies in your understanding of revealed truth, makes it easy to see your other errors since your entire foundation is crumbling. Your denials of the above truths have been seen and demonstrated by you on the BB. We've been over this numerous times.
In addition, nothing I've used is merely philosophical, although philosophy in itself is not error if rooted within the Word of God and it's Wisdom, stemming from what His Word says.
Now; "Philo" being love and "sophia" that of wisdom, being "the love of wisdom", and as one loving the Wisdom of God, would include my believing the Omniscience of God, something your philosophy doesn't embrace, and, loving the truth that God has shown my lost state as is the Biblical mandate in Romans 3 and other epistles by the breath of God, that I was completely incapable without Him to respond, which you also deny, that is, the true state of man set forth by Divine revelation. I confess I also love the Sovereignty of God, and embrace Him in all faith, knowing that nothing shall come to pass without His counsel, firmly trusting Romans 8:28, and yet I trust Him in it all, nor do I call any blame upon Him for the state of this world, nor for the actions of man which He has allowed, and I do not lay the charge by implication that He is somehow unfair, seeing that it is He, and not I, who is very God, and I nothing but clay in His merciful hand.
I also claim no power whatsoever in my choice, but instead give all glory to Him knowing that it is His Spirit that moved me to repentance, regenerated me to life, granted me faith by His Word, giving to me eternal life, making me His child, not I making myself such by a choice.
Any deviation away from the above truths is man based philosphy and is a denial of the truth.
- Peace
Genesis 1:28 "And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth."
( But not really, my servant Calvin has decreed that I shall not give man authority to subdue or have dominion)
Proverbs 18:21 "Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof."
(But not really, my servant Calvin has stated that only I have authority, and I shall not give the power of life and death in man's tongue)
Luke 9:1
"Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases."
( But not really, my servant Calvin has decreed that Jesus did not give power or authority to His followers, sickness is to teach people a lesson)
Matthew 18:18
Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
(But not really, my servant Calvin says that only I have authority to bind and loose, and I should not of given this power)