• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"Do no interpretations belong to God?" Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, & Praeterism positions.

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
Premillennialism.

By contrast, the term Premillennialist (or Chiliasm) identifies Christians who believe that the thousand year reign spoken of in Revelation chapter 20 is earthly or physical in nature. It is where Christ literally returns to earth as potentate, to set up a temporary kingdom where the saints will rule with him. Pre-millennial literally means before millennium, or before the thousand years.

This doctrine teaches that sometime in the future Christ will return to earth, but will not execute the last judgment at once. He will begin a literal one thousand-year reign upon a physical throne in the Middle East. In this eschatology Christ will reign and govern physically from Jerusalem, and peace will have rule on earth from the nation of Israel.

Generally, Premillennialists believe in two separate and unequal programs. A national (rather than individual) salvation plan for the genetically Jewish people, and another separate plan for everyone else (any non-Jew or Gentile).

They generally hold that future redeemed Israel will be the center of government and the spreading of the gospel to the nations of the world. In this, they generally reject the contention that Christ has already come to redeem and deliver Israel, and that He is already presently the center of rule and Government as prophesied.

There are different forms of Premillennialism (Dispensationalism, Historical, etc.), but in general, they do not believe that many Old Testament scriptures that were obviously fulfilled, are "completely" fulfilled. They often take the position that fulfillment in Israel (if any) is incomplete, and the pertinent scriptures dealing with this have yet a further future "literal/physical" fulfillment.

For example, some Premillennialists look for Elijah to literally/physically come back to prepare the way for Christ's rule, because they don't believe that John the Baptist "completely" fulfilled that prophesy.
...

Postmillennialism.

Another view that has seen some increase in popularity within some Reformed circles recently, is Postmillennialism. This is the view that the millennium will produce a future golden age of the Church that will precede the second advent of Christ. They (as do the Amillennialists) offer up the scriptures that declare that Christ is ruling in His kingdom now, and that the kingdom of God is now being extended through the servants of that kingdom preaching the gospel.

But they differ greatly from the Amillennial view in that they believe that at the end of this kingdom age, there will be an age of righteousness and worldwide turning to Christ.

The word "post," means after, and thus Post-millennial identifies those who believe in the return of Christ after this future golden age or period. This belief system usually holds that this golden age of the Church will feature the exercise of Christ's power and authority demonstrated in this world, whereby its rulers will be hindered in their wickedness.

The influence of Christianity will excel and spread until a future time when most of the world will be in obedience to God's laws. Those who hold to this view generally expect that after they have created this just, God-fearing society, Christ will then return, and the judgment and resurrection will occur.
...

Praeterist.

The Praeterist (or Preterist) view means it's past fulfillment. Praeterit is Latin and means Pre (before) in fulfillment. i.e., [L. praeteritus, gone by]. It is expressing time fulfilled. There are many different types of Praeterists including, partial and full. They generally believe that most or all of Bible Prophecy has already been fulfilled in Christ, and the on-going expansion of His Kingdom.

They hang this belief of Past-fulfillment on many different verses, including the witness that Jesus and his apostles said that his coming (or presence) and the end of all things, would occur soon (they surmise, in that physical generation).

Most full Praeterists spiritualize the majority (or all) of Matthew chapter 24 as having already taken place in the past, and often believe that Christ actually returned in 70 AD, fulfilling the prophesy of the second advent.
 

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member

Where are you going to your Spurgeon quote? The link just went where it wanted, I think.

“Only fools and madmen are positive in their interpretations of the apocalypse.” C.H. Spurgeon.

I disagree, wholeheartedly, if so.

I believe that in the same way, the DNA in our arm describes in minute detail, "How to Build this Individual's Arm", I see God as having pointed us specifically to what He would have us understand from the use of His Apocalyptic writings, in Revelation.

The beginning key is that each of the seven visions spans a Timeline, from the First Coming of Jesus to the Second Coming of Jesus, with each of them going deeper into what God is revealing than the one before it.*

With that obvious structure being how Revelation is to be interpreted, that summarily eliminates any other method as being a valid procedure, to arrive at its meaning.

In other words, for anyone to simply believe that each chapter follows chronologically after the one before it, reading straight through it, from beginning to end, would get us to no more understanding than if we read through The Four Gospels, which some have done, one after the other, as if they were following one another in that way and wondered just how many crucifixions, etc., that there were supposed to be(?)

Any ideas generated by going from one chapter to the next, through the book of Revelation, actually is only for fools, novices, and madmen, or sadly mistaken, men aided only by their flesh and human reasoning, who wind up with nothing but a hodgepodge of worthless speculation, no more valuable than trying to read the wording, from right to left.

But, I believe that you have already gathered that kind of thing from the classic,
https://tbc.tn-biblecollege.edu/files/tbc/resthistlib/Hendricksen-W-More_Than_Conquerors_-1940.pdf

Anyone, who ever gives his first six chapters the benefit of the doubt, much less bowed down to The Lordship of Christ, asking and seeking, in prayer, usually come away with less doubt about what Revelation teaches than they have had in their whole life, previously.

*A. The Struggle on Earth. The Church persecuted by the world.
The Church is avenged, protected and victorious (Rev. 1-11).

1. Christ in the midst of the seven golden lampstands (1-3).
2. The book with seven seals (4-7).
3. The seven trumpets of judgment (8-11).

B. The Deeper Spiritual Background.
The Christ (and the Church) persecuted by the dragon (Satan) and his helpers.
Christ and His Church are victorious (Rev. 12-22).

4. The woman and the Man-child persecuted by the dragon
and his helpers (the beasts and the harlot) (12-14).
5. The seven bowls of wrath (15, 16).
6. The fall of the great harlot and of the beasts (17-19).
7. The judgment upon the dragon (Satan)
followed by the new heaven and earth, new Jerusalem (20-22).
 
Last edited:

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
I'm just wondering if it's possible for you to edit the title of the thread. At present it is: "Do no Interpretations Belong to GOD?" I'm sure you meant: "Do not Interpretations Belong to GOD?" which almost the exact opposite.

Cool. Missed that letter there, didn`t I?

Shhhhh, maybe, others won`t notice.

Yes, thank you, Fine Catch! And, yeah, we can `t get to the titles to edit them, after they are posted. But, IT NEEDS IT!

I`m fibbing, sort of. I hate to think we`d have to ask that that way? Like we`ve all just run off with them in our own unaided fleshly reasoning! But, what are we doing, if we come off with that oftentimes repeated Montra, "There are four ways to interpret Revelation"!? God forbid!

Do not interpretations belong to God? What`s His is what we want to know. Not so much bulk that HAS TO BE WRONG!

Thanks again!
 

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
Cool. Missed that letter there, didn`t I?

Shhhhh, maybe, others won`t notice.

Yes, thank you, Fine Catch! And, yeah, we can `t get to the titles to edit them, after they are posted. But, IT NEEDS IT!

I`m fibbing, sort of. I hate to think we`d have to ask that that way? Like we`ve all just run off with them in our own unaided fleshly reasoning! But, what are we doing, if we come off with that oftentimes repeated Montra, "There are four ways to interpret Revelation"!? God forbid!

Do not interpretations belong to God? What`s His is what we want to know. Not so much bulk that HAS TO BE WRONG!

Thanks again!
Thanks for not taking offence. I only posted because being in the title, it was so noticeable.
 

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
So, Alan, are you going to show us just how positive you are in your interpretation of Revelation?

I'm very absolutely, most positive, that if Spurgeon felt everyone needed to be labeled a fool or a madman, who has the most basic understanding of exactly the one and only valid method of End Times interpretation possible, then, fine,

he apparently thought it was his job to say that he was incompetent at that portion of his job, to teach The Bible,

otherwise, he wouldn't be so sure about God's Ability to Spiritually Bestow to His children WHAT HE WANTS THEM TO UNDERSTAND from The Book of Revelation,

and I am here to testify that it is not that He is going to offer anyone a Second Chance, after Jesus' Return, to obtain Salvation,

or to preach another gospel that it's O.K., to not preach the Gospel at all for The Holy Spirit to Use it as the means and instrumentality in The New Birth, every time He saves a soul,

and to especially leave the Jews around the world on their own, without going to preach the Gospel to them,

BECAUSE WHEN JESUS RETURNS AGAIN, HE IS GOING TO BE THE ONE WHO TAKES CARE OF ALL THAT

AND JESUS HAS PLANNED TO SPEAK TO THEM, HIMSELF, PERSONALLY, MANO A MONO, HAND TO HAND, GOD TO LOST PEOPLE, RIGHT?,

or that there seven separate Returns of Jesus people have to teach, as they read through the book of Revelation, or that The End of the World keeps happening in there, over and over,

or even that "we need to take everything in it literally, unless it has to be taken Spiritually", without telling us how everyone is going to pick the same times we need to be doing which one,

WHY DON'T PEOPLE JUST BRAG ON THEIR IGNORANCE, LIKE SPURGEON DOES THERE,

AND ADMIT THAT THEY DON'T EVEN CLAIM TO HAVE ANY VIABLE HERMENEUTICAL PRINCIPALS WITHIN THEIR REPERTOIRE, when they close their Bible on their pulpit, and put there elbows down on it and loudly proclaim unto all the world,

"NOW, Let me tell you what is all going to happen and take place in the future, man....so, you don't have to worry your pretty little head about it, right now, you know, you poor pitiful little unsuspecting person..."

THAT IS THE BOOK OF REVELATION, RIGHT THERE!

People who will be scathingly censored, themselves, by Jesus Christ Himself, because they are among the wicked servants found in the Parables of the Talents and Pounds, who don't even read and take seriously that when Jesus Returns, He is going to separate the sheep from the goats,

BECAUSE IT IS THE GREAT CONSUMMATION, THE END OF TIME, THE END OF THE WORLD, AND THE END OF THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ANOTHER SOUL TO EVER BE GRANTED ETERNAL SALVATION.

That, Brother KY, is what I am positive about my interpretation of Revelation.

JESUS MAY RETURN, TODAY, FOR THE ONE AND ONLY, VERY LAST TIME, FOR ALL TIME AND ETERNITY!!!

After that, it's over.
No more BB, no more alarm clocks, or mornings, no more work, or play, or heresy, for that matter, or bed sores, or crippled children,

BUT YOU BETTER BE TELLING SOMEONE TO TURN OR BURN, BEFORE IT'S ETERNALLY TOO LATE FOR ANYONE TO EVER BE SAVED.

And, there you sit, not caring whether the book of Revelation teaches anything, for sure, just right where Satan wants you, and mocking the one person you know who hasn't been distracted so much that I don't realize SATAN IS DOOMED

AND JESUS IS COMING BACK ONCE AND FOR ALL, ONE DAY, and that Revelation teaches that

AND SATAN HAS GONE ABOUT MAKING SURE EVERYONE THINKS SAYING "WELL, THERE ARE FOUR WAYS TO TEACH REVELATION, DON'T YOU KNOW" (?), IS GOD-HONORING OR THE LEAST BIT RATIONAL, REASONABLE, OR INTELLIGENT.

They may be singing, "it is well with my soul", when that is wrong, too. Dunno.

Either people go with God or the Devil.

Tell me again, to take Revelation literally, first, when the first VERSE IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION has God telling us that it was JESUS WHO "sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John".

Greek;
4591. semaino -- to give a sign.

1 "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto Him, to shew unto His servants things which must shortly come to pass; and He sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John:

WHO ARE YOU GOING TO LISTEN TO? GOD OR THE DEVIL, KY?

Have even you, at least, learned that much, yet?

Or do you think one person's interpretation is no better than any others and no church is any different than any other and that no way of salvation anyone says is any better than anyone else's?

Will The Son of Man Find The Faith Once and For All Time Delivered to the saints when He comes?

Better be ready. That is my interpretation of Revelation that I am positive of.

And that it's written in an Apocalyptic, symbolic, signified genre, Spurgeon.

U?

“Only fools and madmen are positive in their interpretations of the apocalypse.” C.H. Spurgeon.
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
It is where Christ literally returns to earth as potentate, to set up a temporary kingdom where the saints will rule with him.

Why is it only when premillennialism is critiqued that the reign in the millennium is "temporary"? Why can't this criticism carry over into the amillennial view?

And I've never encountered a premillennialist who believed Christ's reign was temporary. Can you give us your source?
 

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
Why is it only when premillennialism is critiqued that the reign in the millennium is "temporary"? Why can't this criticism carry over into the amillennial view?

And I've never encountered a premillennialist who believed Christ's reign was temporary. Can you give us your source?

The Kingdom set up where the saints rule with Jesus on earth, during a literal calender 1,000 year period, is not restricted or limited to exist only within that supposed 1,000 years?

And chapter 20 doesn`t have any mention of a kingdom set up, anyway, because everything said in the Bible to transpire during that one thousand years, takes place in Heaven and nothing is said about anything set up on Earth, whatsoever.
 
Last edited:

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
Revelation 20:1-15 says what God means!

Revelation 20:1-15 says what God means!

And, God means what Revelation 20:1-15 says!

So, the question is, "What does Revelation 20:1-15 say?"

My Bible says, in vs 4 "And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years."

John saw souls of departed saints, who reigned on thrones, with Jesus. Departed souls, ruling on thrones, where Jesus is, is in Heaven, for a thousand years.

The thousand years takes place in Heaven, from what I see God means. Is that what your Bible says God means, then?
 

Jope

Active Member
Site Supporter
The Kingdom set up where the saints rule with Jesus on earth, during a literal calender 1,000 year period, is not restricted or limited to exist only within that supposed 1,000 years?

In Premillennialism, Jesus' reign from David's throne lasts forever, beginning with Jesus' physical return to Earth to sit on David's throne. You still haven't given us your source as to what premillennialist believed the millennial reign of Christ is temporary.

And chapter 20 doesn`t have any mention of a kingdom set up, anyway, because everything said in the Bible to transpire during that one thousand years, takes place in Heaven and nothing is said about anything set up on Earth, whatsoever.

Rev 20 doesnt have any mention of a kingdom set up? I think you're even misrepresenting Amillennialism now.
 

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
In Premillennialism, Jesus' reign from David's throne lasts forever, beginning with Jesus' physical return to Earth to sit on David's throne.
Premillennialism has not Bible for their position, of "Jesus' physical return to Earth to sit on David's throne". And, I can't imagine why you continue to dream that they do. Jesus' Return is The End of The World and I can give you over fifty verses which teach that to be so, while you can offer none in support of that bogus lie of Premillennialism.
You still haven't given us your source as to what premillennialist believed the millennial reign of Christ is temporary.
Well, because your question is about "the millennial reign". Is "millennial" supposed to represent some period of time that is not temporary?
Rev 20 doesnt have any mention of a kingdom set up?
Our discussion involves the thousand-year reign and my comment was in reference to Revelation 20:1-6, not the entire chapter of Revelation 20 that I just wrote that way, without adding the 1-6.

The Kingdom set up where the saints rule with Jesus on earth, during a literal calender 1,000 year period, is not restricted or limited to exist only within that supposed 1,000 years?

And chapter 20 doesn`t have any mention of a kingdom set up, anyway, because everything said in the Bible to transpire during that one thousand years, takes place in Heaven and nothing is said about anything set up on Earth, whatsoever.

I think you're even misrepresenting Amillennialism now.
In spite of giving you something to cry about, I've tried to hold your hand and feed you The Bible God Wrote against your will, while the context of the remainder of the sentence represents not only Amillennialism but the Revelation of God in The Bible, just fine. "everything said in the Bible to transpire during that one thousand years, takes place in Heaven and nothing is said about anything set up on Earth, whatsoever."

Get used to it.
 
Last edited:

timtofly

Well-Known Member
Revelation 20:1-15 says what God means!
By that metric, Salvation is not eternal either. Those in heaven don't need Salvation. Only those who live temporarily on earth experience Salvation. Once a soul leaves earth they are no longer saved, as that is not necessary to be considered unsaved vs. saved in heaven.

John is on earth in Revelation 20:1-15. How can he see what takes place in heaven?

"And I saw an angel come down from heaven."

If John was in heaven it should read:

"And I saw an angel leave heaven and head toward the earth."

Then John would never see anything else, because he was in heaven and the other events were on the earth.

Heaven does not have a monopoly on thrones. If these thrones were in heaven why not just say the 24 elders were the one's sitting in Judgment?

These souls never deserved to enter heaven to begin with, as these souls would have not needed to be judged if they had had the second birth.

You claim these are all the souls from the last 1994 years, who now, as all those billions who are now in heaven sitting on billions of thrones. Do those souls have bodies or are those thrones not physical either?

For one, these souls are limited in scope to a specific 42 month period that takes place between the 7th Trumpet and Armageddon. While these souls receive a resurrection and then rule, they don't go to heaven, because they would still be that camp of saints reigning on earth, ruling with Christ on the earth. These same souls would be who all those people were heading on earth to attack.

Why would the topic change from resurrection back to earth, if you have no reason why they, those same beheaded souls, suddenly returned to earth to be attacked a thousand years later?

John is still seeing time play out on earth, because that attack at the end was still on the earth.

Why would those beheaded souls self judge themselves, and grant themselves the first resurrection?

Receiving the first resurrection does not suddenly transport one into heaven, especially if that person was not in heaven to begin with.

And John is not telling us that billions of souls are being beheaded on an ongoing basis for thousands of years.

John explicitly states these souls were just beheaded and they did not worship the beast nor receive the mark which was also not an ongoing phenomenon for thousands of years. The beast and those with the mark were just destroyed at Armageddon. These souls just died in the time frame of Armageddon, and were never said to go to heaven once. This cannot be an experience where a phenomenon had not even taken place until thousands of years after you claim they even lived and died. You say the thousand years ends at Armageddon.

According to John, Armageddon just happened and now these beheaded souls were being judged, so they could be rewarded the first resurrection, which is a physical body, so they can live on a physical earth as normal human beings. They never made it to heaven, but only escaped the LOF, and the mark which, if they had the mark, they would have been killed at Armageddon, had they not been beheaded. That is the context of these souls. Armageddon and death with the mark. Beheaded and physically resurrected without being tossed into the LOF.

The rest of the dead still had to wait until time was over on the earth. What would be the point of being in heaven for those thousand years, which would have not been considered time at all in heaven, which you don't even see as a thousand years but multiple millennia. If this was from the heavenly perspective it would have felt like a day, or two. Certainly not a longer than a thousand year time frame.
 
Last edited:

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
By that metric, Salvation is not eternal either. Those in heaven don't need Salvation. Only those who live temporarily on earth experience Salvation. Once a soul leaves earth they are no longer saved, as that is not necessary to be considered unsaved vs. saved in heaven.

Well, there is reason The Lord talks about those
who have had a part in The First Resurrection
and speaks of those who will experience The Second Death.

Let's back up and take another more complete shot at all this.
...

The nations are the earthly population, during the "thousand years",
which the Devil is not able to deceive.
That is the only reference to anyone on Earth, in Revelation 20:1-6.

Do you assume or want to write something else in there, for it to say??

1 "And I saw an Angel come down from Heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

2 "And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil,
and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

3 "And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up,
and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more,
till the thousand years should be fulfilled:
and after that he must be loosed a little season.


4 "And I saw Thrones, and they sat upon them,
and Judgment was Given unto them:

"and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus,
and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast,
neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads,
or in their hands; and they lived and Reigned with Christ a thousand years.


5 "But the rest of the dead lived not again
until the thousand years were finished.

"This is the First Resurrection.


6 "Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in the First Resurrection:
on such the Second Death hath no power,
but they shall be priests of God and of Christ,
and shall reign with Him a thousand years."


When you come to a passage like this,
do you come with some idea in your head
that Jesus is on Earth Ruling from His Throne, like Dave ruled on Earth,
over the souls mentioned there that is different than God's Throne in Heaven?

Otherwise, the passage is right there.

Or, do you come to a passage to see what God says in it?

"In connection with this ‘thousand-year reign’ of verses 4-6
we shall answer three questions.

"First, where does it take place?

"According to the passage which we are considering
it takes place in three places.


"(i) The thousand-year reign occurs where the Thrones are,
for we read:
‘And I saw Thrones and they sat upon them.’

"Now, according to the entire book of Revelation,
the Throne of Christ and of His people
is invariably in Heaven
(Rev. 1:4; 3:21; 4:2 if.; etc.).

1:4; "John to the seven churches which are in Asia:

Grace be unto you, and peace, from Him which Is,
and which Was, and which is to Come;

and from the seven Spirits which are before His Throne."

3:21; "To Him that overcometh Will I Grant to sit with Me in My Throne,
even as I also Overcame, and am Set Down with My Father in His Throne."


4:2; "And immediately I was in the Spirit:
and, behold, a Throne was set in Heaven, and One Sat on the Throne.


(ii) The thousand-year reign also occurs
where the disembodied souls of the martyrs are
,
for we read:
‘And I saw the souls of them that had been beheaded
for the testimony of Jesus.’

"John sees souls, not bodies.
He is thinking of souls without bodies, for we read:
‘of them that had been beheaded

and John also sees the souls,
"which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image,
neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands".


"In this entire passage, there is not a single word
about the Resurrection of 'bodies'.

The First Resurrection is the saved soul's passage into Heaven.

Then, this is where John sees the souls, who were saved
and who have passed into Heaven, at their death,
which is The First Resurrection, for all saved souls.

"I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus,
and for the Word of God,

"and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image,
neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands;

"and they lived and Reigned with Christ a thousand years."


"The distinction between soul and body is even emphasized:
the souls of them that had been beheaded.

"True, the term ‘souls' at times means ‘people’ (e. g. Gn. 46: 27).
But in that case you can substitute the term ‘people’ for ‘souls’
.
Here in Revelation 20 you cannot do so.)

"These souls are said to Reign during this entire present Interadvental Period,
from Jesus' First Advent on Earth and His Ascension,
until Jesus' Second Advent at Jesus' Second Coming.

John sees the souls of them, who were saved,
who have passed from death to Heaven,
which is The First Resurrection;

John says he saw;
"the souls of them that had been beheaded
for the testimony of Jesus"
and John sees the souls of them,
"which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image,
neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands"


and these "shall be priests of God and of Christ,
and shall Reign with Him a thousand years
, in Heaven (20:6b).

(iii) The thousand-year reign also occurs where Jesus Lives,
for we read ‘And they lived and Reigned with Christ.... ’

"The question is, where, according to the Apocalypse,

is the Place from which the Exalted Mediator Rules the Universe?

Where does Jesus live?


"Clearly, it is in Heaven.

"It is in Heaven that the Lamb
is represented as taking the scroll out of the Hand of Him
that Sat on the Throne (Rev. 5).

"Revelation 12 clearly states that Christ was,
caught up to God and to His Throne...
Therefore, rejoice O Heavens, and ye that dwell therein’.


"We may safely say, therefore,

that the thousand-year Reign,
which is exclusively spoken of in Revelation 20:1-6,
takes place entirely in Heaven."

Adapted from pg.192 ff.,
in MORE THAN CONQUERORS.

See The First Resurrection in the next post.
 
Last edited:

Alan Dale Gross

Active Member
The First Resurrection.

20:4b,c;
"the souls of them that were beheaded...
and which had not worshipped the beast,"


who were saved and had died and passed on into Heaven,

20:4d; "lived and Reigned with Christ a thousand years,

which the second part of the next verse says,
in 20:5b; "This is the First Resurrection."

20:5a; "But the rest of the dead lived not again
until the thousand years were finished."


The rest of those who had died lost,
had taken part in The First Death,
of their bodies, which had died on Earth
and will experience their bodies Reunited with their lost souls,
after the thousand years, at Jesus' Return, which is "The Second Death",
when they cast into The Lake of Fire, after The great White Throne Judgment.

20:6a; "Blessed and Holy is he that hath part in the First Resurrection:

These souls "that hath part in The First Resurrection are,
20:4b; again, "the souls of them that were beheaded...
and which had not worshipped the beast,"


who were saved and had died and passed on into Heaven,

and they, "lived and Reigned with Christ a thousand years,

20:6a; "on such the Second Death hath no power,

Then, again, those on whom The Second Death has power
are the rest of those who had died lost,
and had taken part in The First Death, of their bodies, which had died on Earth
and they will experience their bodies Reunited with their lost souls,
after the thousand years, at Jesus' Return, which is "The Second Death",
when they cast into The Lake of Fire, after The Great White Throne Judgment.

20:4b,c; "the souls of them that were beheaded...
and which had not worshipped the beast,"


who were saved and had died and passed on into Heaven,

20:6c; "...they shall be priests of God and of Christ,
and shall Reign with Him a thousand years."

...

Later, after the "thousand year" Reign in Heaven is over,
at Jesus' Second Coming, the souls of these saved saints,
will be United with their Glorified Resurrected Bodies,
at The Second Resurrection.

"At The Second Resurrection, it is no longer only their souls that Reign,
with Jesus Christ in Heaven and The New Heaven and New Earth,
because, then their body and soul have been Reunited together again.

"Then the saints Reign in their Glorified Resurrected Bodies,
with Jesus Christ in Heaven and The New Heaven and New Earth,
not for a limited though lengthy period —of just a thousand years—
but ‘Forever and Ever’ (22: 5).

22:5; "And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle,
neither light of the sun; for the Lord God Giveth them Light:
and they shall Reign Forever and Ever."
 
Top