• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Do we need paper ballots?

Wingman68

Wingman68

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It has bothered me that we use voting machines connected to Soros for awhile now. You always hear about peoples votes being flipped before their eyes. How many do not see that happening, & simply trusting the system? How can you trust anything that Soros has a hand in? Apparently it goes even deeper as this article expounds on which implicates the UK being involved:

https://aim4thetruth.org/2018/07/21...g-the-queens-privy-council-with-george-soros/
 
Baptist Believer

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm not terribly conspiratorial, but we need to have a paper trail for elections in order to be able to verify any suspicious results. There is too much opportunity for mischief for all-electronic voting systems.
 
InTheLight

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It's a state's issue. If people want paper ballots they need to make noise at the state's level.

I'm fine with the paper ballots that you fill out by darkening an oval next to the candidate's name and then place in an optical scanner. That provides quick, computerized counting and leaves a paper trail for auditing.

Old style paper ballots are not immune from tampering.
 
Adonia

Adonia

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We need a paper receipt of all votes cast and all voting machines not connected to the internet as the state of Vermont currently practices.
 
Reynolds

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Wingman68 said:
It has bothered me that we use voting machines connected to Soros for awhile now. You always hear about peoples votes being flipped before their eyes. How many do not see that happening, & simply trusting the system? How can you trust anything that Soros has a hand in? Apparently it goes even deeper as this article expounds on which implicates the UK being involved:

https://aim4thetruth.org/2018/07/21...g-the-queens-privy-council-with-george-soros/
Click to expand...
Dead people etc. Voting bother me much more than voting machine hacking.
 
FollowTheWay

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
We use old technology voting machines in the U.S. that are fairly easy hackable. I don't see any connection to Soros. (The link provided didn't work.) The computerized results of the 2016 Presidential election in GA and the 6th District election to replace Tom Price in Atlanta were stored on a computer administered by kennesaw State univ. overseen by the GA Republican leadership. These were subpoenaed in a court case investigation whether the results were legitimate. Less than a week after the court subpoena they were erased from the computer. There has never been an adequate explanation of why this was done and who did it.
 
HankD

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
FollowTheWay said:
We use old technology voting machines in the U.S. that are fairly easy hackable. I don't see any connection to Soros. (The link provided didn't work.) The computerized results of the 2016 Presidential election in GA and the 6th District election to replace Tom Price in Atlanta were stored on a computer administered by kennesaw State univ. overseen by the GA Republican leadership. These were subpoenaed in a court case investigation whether the results were legitimate. Less than a week after the court subpoena they were erased from the computer. There has never been an adequate explanation of why this was done and who did it.
Click to expand...
Vladimir.
 
InTheLight

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
FollowTheWay said:
We use old technology voting machines in the U.S. that are fairly easy hackable. I don't see any connection to Soros. (The link provided didn't work.) The computerized results of the 2016 Presidential election in GA and the 6th District election to replace Tom Price in Atlanta were stored on a computer administered by kennesaw State univ. overseen by the GA Republican leadership. These were subpoenaed in a court case investigation whether the results were legitimate. Less than a week after the court subpoena they were erased from the computer. There has never been an adequate explanation of why this was done and who did it.
Click to expand...

Price won 62% to 38%. That district is heavily Republican. It is considered a safe Republican district. Really doubt that election needed hacking.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
FollowTheWay

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
InTheLight said:
Price won 62% to 38%. That district is heavily Republican. It is considered a safe Republican district. Really doubt that election needed hacking.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
the 6th District election to replace Tom Price in Atlanta

I live in that district.
“Because of the insecurity of Georgia’s voting system and the lack of voter-verifiable paper ballots, the precise outcome of the June 20, 2017 runoff election between Karen Handel and Jon Ossoff for Georgia’s 6th Congressional District . . .cannot be known,” the lawsuit states of the contest in which Handel, a Republican, curiously defeated Ossoff, a Democrat, by nearly four percentage points, despite the fact that polls had shown Ossoff narrowly ahead of Handel.

 
J

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
FollowTheWay said:
the 6th District election to replace Tom Price in Atlanta

I live in that district.
“Because of the insecurity of Georgia’s voting system and the lack of voter-verifiable paper ballots, the precise outcome of the June 20, 2017 runoff election between Karen Handel and Jon Ossoff for Georgia’s 6th Congressional District . . .cannot be known,” the lawsuit states of the contest in which Handel, a Republican, curiously defeated Ossoff, a Democrat, by nearly four percentage points, despite the fact that polls had shown (emphasis mine) Ossoff narrowly ahead of Handel.
Click to expand...

Polls also showed that:
1) HILDEBEAST was going to be the next POTUS by a huge margin!!
2) Trump would never be the POTUS because --------!

SHAZAM !!!!

1) The HILDEBEAST is NOT POTUS
2) Trump IS POTUS

Moral: Don't invest your retirement funds in "POLLS"!! They are notorious for "fake news"!
 
FollowTheWay

FollowTheWay

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
just-want-peace said:
Polls also showed that:
1) HILDEBEAST was going to be the next POTUS by a huge margin!!
2) Trump would never be the POTUS because --------!

SHAZAM !!!!

1) The HILDEBEAST is NOT POTUS
2) Trump IS POTUS

Moral: Don't invest your retirement funds in "POLLS"!! They are notorious for "fake news"!
Click to expand...
That's what previous dictators like Mao, Staling and Hitler did, shut down the free press and not allow anyone to disagree with them.
 
LowOiL

LowOiL

Active Member
As of now, I am more worried about fake illegal voters than the voting machines being hacked. There is zero evidence of hacking breaking the voting machines. There has been phishing (sending emails) with dumb employees letting hackers into the democrat and republican party headquarters but it didn't get far. The only serious hacking was in the DMC with the Paki that seemed to be bribing them and then being protected by the very same democrats that didn't want his computers searched.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top