active before 1970 who quoted other versions favorably? This question is intended for the KJVO folks.
It will be hard for you people to name any preacher from 1880 --1970 as an example -- who quoted only from the KJV. Many used the KJV primarily but thought that some renderings in the latter were inferior to that of other versions such as the RV, American Standard Version, Weymouth, MLB etc.
I know that some of you (collective "you") think that people are lost if they use any version of the Bible but the KJV. A number of you are not as severe. You think that other versions are impoverished -- that they may contain some basic doctrines, but really are watered-down compared to the super-clear and only inspired version -- the KJV.
Therefore, is it still possible that you might even respect some preachers who "compromised" by using other versions primarily -- or quoted them with favor occasionally though using the KJV chiefly?
It will be hard for you people to name any preacher from 1880 --1970 as an example -- who quoted only from the KJV. Many used the KJV primarily but thought that some renderings in the latter were inferior to that of other versions such as the RV, American Standard Version, Weymouth, MLB etc.
I know that some of you (collective "you") think that people are lost if they use any version of the Bible but the KJV. A number of you are not as severe. You think that other versions are impoverished -- that they may contain some basic doctrines, but really are watered-down compared to the super-clear and only inspired version -- the KJV.
Therefore, is it still possible that you might even respect some preachers who "compromised" by using other versions primarily -- or quoted them with favor occasionally though using the KJV chiefly?