I never thought that the Pharisee considered himself to be without sin. The Pharisee is merely saying:DHK said:Even the unsaved self-righteous consider themselves without sin. Consider the Pharisee praying before the temple in Luke 18. He, in contrast to the publican, did not consider himself a sinner.
1. he is not as bad as the other guy "I thank thee, that I am not as other men"
and
2. that he has done enough to atone for his own sins. "I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess"
The point Jesus was making with this parable is not that we are all sinners, but rather that we are not to be like the Pharisees who rejected Him and "trusted in themselves that they were righteous"Luke 18:9
Your leaving out verse 9 is very peculiar: "If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness."DHK said:Nevertheless, the strength of the argument against entire sanctification lies in 1 John 1, where John, includes himself, when he says:
1 John 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1 John 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
Do you really have any argument against this Scripture?
Your understanding of being cleansed from unrighteousness does not go as deep as what I think scripture does. You see it as a positional one only with no practical implications for this life. Your salvation is in the future while I understand it to be here and now. You do not see that those in Christ are no longer under the control of sin: "For sin shall not have dominion over you" Romans 6:14.
This appears to be another rehash of of what you two have wrestled about over and over again. HP will never convince DHK that a born again believer can actually go a day without sinning sin and DHK will never convince HP (or me for that matter) that we are stuck in this condition of being enslaved to sin until we die or Christ returns.