Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I don't know what a Futurist view for God is so I can't answer that question.Originally posted by Benjamin:
Marcia, do you hold to a Futurist view for God?
So God is outside of time and is not bound to it in any way? How can God even tell time in this view? Do time statements in scripture not really mean anything because God is only outside of time?
Of course God doesn't have a problem communicating time to man. He didn't have a problem creating the universe from nothing so I don't know how it would be hard for God to communicate time or in terms of time to man.God that is not bound to time in any way apparently has no problem communicating it to man whom is bound by time in such things as latter days, near-far, days to come, shortly, etc.
If God in truth is not able to exist in time why would it be necessary for Him to create it for us if not to interact with us, or maybe you believe He doesn’t interact with us?
I don't think for God to interact with man in time means that God either has to exist in time or be bound to it or by it. He exists outside time but is capable of acting with man, who is in time.In the dimension of time is where man meets God, so can God exist within time?
How about Jesus, did He exist within time, was He ever bound by time?
You are quick to want to label things into a category of man’s interpretations of time, but I would rather stay away from mans faulty theologies and out of the either/or while considering God capable of both in/out of time which does not take 2 Gods to be within the truth just as in 2 Persons being in 2 places unless you also have a problem with Trinity under this reasoning.
This sounds like a red herring.It just isn’t that easy to start branding titles in this area that we do not fully understand.
To me, that's like asking why does God no longer requires us to sacrifice animals for our sins. It's not a change of mind, but a change in God's covenant/dispensation with man, a change that God knew he was going to make all along. A change of mind implies that God did not know future contingencies and is reacting to man or some other circumstance before He makes a decision.Originally posted by timothy27:
Just to be a devils advocate, not that I believe God changes his mind, (I do not for anyone who is looking to take bits of posts and use it for their own means), but my question is this...
Adam and Eve had children obviously to populate the world their children interbred and intermarried. Cousins with cousins, brothers, with sisters etc. Then in Leviticus(correct me if I am wrong) God let it be known that incest is not to be tolerated, Sodom and Gamorra were destroyed becasue incest (among the many other things) was going on.
So... why was it okay for a time and then not okay? Did God change His mind about it?
Where is incest cited as a reason for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah? Not doubting you. I just hadn't seen that before and would very much like to share it if true. I am preparing a sermon on the prime characters of that story.Originally posted by timothy27:
Just to be a devils advocate, not that I believe God changes his mind, (I do not for anyone who is looking to take bits of posts and use it for their own means), but my question is this...
Adam and Eve had children obviously to populate the world their children interbred and intermarried. Cousins with cousins, brothers, with sisters etc. Then in Leviticus(correct me if I am wrong) God let it be known that incest is not to be tolerated, Sodom and Gamorra were destroyed becasue incest (among the many other things) was going on.
So... why was it okay for a time and then not okay? Did God change His mind about it?