Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Would either of them be viewed as being a "christian church?"
Why not include Presbyterians in that question (or Methodists , UCC and others for that matter)? Does the belief in sacramental grace put someone outside of Christian belief? It seems on this board that if you are a Catholic, it does. If you are Protestant, it probably doesn't. Is this consistant?
http://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/today/sacraments/
Why not include Presbyterians in that question (or Methodists , UCC and others for that matter)? Does the belief in sacramental grace put someone outside of Christian belief? It seems on this board that if you are a Catholic, it does. If you are Protestant, it probably doesn't. Is this consistant?
http://www.presbyterianmission.org/ministries/today/sacraments/
Sacramentalism puts one outside the gospel of Jesus Christ and is a false perverted gospel - Rom. 4:11
Do the protestantgroups that have 'sacraments" view them in same fashion as the RCC does?
Sacramentalism is the doctrine that justifying and sustaining saving grace is imparted through the ordinances. Every denomination that view baptism and/or the Lord's supper as literally salvational is a gospel rejector.
Do the Anglicasns/Luthereyn/presbyterians see it that way?
From the Spring 2011 ARBCA Update, a 'Reformed Baptist' newsletter:
http://arbca.com/updates/sping2011arbcaupdate.pdf
"The Means of Grace, though very familiar to all members of the Association of Reformed Baptist Churches of America, drew much scrutiny from the pulpit and the pews at this year’s ARBCA General Assembly, held at Trinity Reformed Baptist Church in La Mirada, Calif. The GA, which attracted 149 attendees, featured far more public discussion of various issues, particularly the question of how to respond to differences of opinion, some of which have cropped up recently. . . .Dr. Richard Barcellos of Heritage Baptist Church, Owensboro, Ky., spoke on “The Lord’s Supper as Means of Grace,” focusing on the benefits that communion conveys to believers–it’s not just a memorial meal. Those benefits include sanctifying grace indued to the soul, the benefits of Christ’s body and blood nourishes believers’ souls, the frequency of the supper, and its links with the past, “do this in remembrance of Me”, present “the cup of blessing which we drink,” and future “do this till I come,” as recorded by Christ’s directives. He noted that “baptism is a sacrament of spiritual birth; the Lord’s Supper is a sacrament of spiritual feeding.”"
No sacramentalist sees it my way or they would not be sacramentalists. The majority of Lutherans do see it that way but attempt to explain it so that it does not appear that way.
I believe all of them believe that some LITERAL form of grace is conveyed through the ordinances even though Presbyterians and some Episcopalians may deny the ordinances are salvational.
I came to know Jesus at my confirmation. Not that I was saved by confirmation, but that I realized the Christ as my personal Saviour. Baptism at birth left the responsibility of later redemptive acts to the people who stood beside them making that commitment. The baptism itself was not salvatoric.
There are more evangelical Anglican churches in England than in America. Even Canada has a fair share of evangelical Anglican churches.
It is interesting to note that the majority of Christian books at the turn of the last century were written by English Anglicans. Those books are treasured even to-day.
I was Anglican when I came to Canada in 1948, and remained so as a chaplain in the Canadian Army through Korea and til 1958, when I became a Baptist pastor. This came about when I attended a Baptist Seminary in Toronto.
In the area where I live now, there are very few Baptist churches and they are miles apart. The Anglican Rector in my home village is evangelical and I even led a weekly Bible study there. I have used my Common Prayer Book throughout my life as a personal worship and spiritual guide.
I can't speak for England now because I haven't been over for a few years now, but I do recall people in the countryside who walked two miles each way just to attend church, and they were solid believers.
I just find it hard to talk down about any denomination in totality because true believers are everywhere. We may differ in some aspects, but many Baptists fall into that category, even in fundamental circles.
Cheers,
Jim
I veiw Reformed Baptists as nothing more than immersed protestants.
Hence, it is no great surprise that among their other false doctrines they assume another protestant false doctrine. We do not fellowship or exchange baptism with Reformed Baptists and I don't consider them any more of a "Christian" church than I do Protestant churches.
The gospel is one essential but there are ecclesiastical essentials to be regard ecclesiatically "Chrisitan" and Reformed Baptists do not possess those essentials. Their church government is foreign to the New Testament as is their practice of baptism and the Lord's Supper.
. . .that is prejudice and/ or ignorence talking. The reality is that a sacrement is nothing more then. . .
Oh dear! You've just invited a load of cack from the usual suspects based on The Trail of Blood.Wow, well where do your "baptist" toots lie if not in the protestant reformation?