1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Does the New Testament teach us that we can use instrumental music in worship

Discussion in 'Music Ministry' started by God's Word is TRUTH, Jul 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gib

    Gib Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    27,256
    Likes Received:
    14
    Please give us specific NT scripture that says we are NOT to use instruments in worship.
     
  2. God's Word is TRUTH

    God's Word is TRUTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    the scriptures tell us to sing thats it. it doesn't say to make music, if it did that could include musical instrumental music. but sing is very specific, sing, thats it nothing more nothing less.

    show me where it says we can't add cake and pie to the lords supper.
    show me where it says we can't baptize infants.
    show me where it says we can't offer insence as worship.

    God doesn't need to make a big book of don'ts he tells us what He wants us to do and we should obey and do it, he tells us to sing, nothing more nothing less. I've never heard of someone being able to make a musical instrument sing, how about you?

    In Christian Love,

    Dustin
     
  3. Gib

    Gib Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    27,256
    Likes Received:
    14
    So your NOT going to show me specifically where the NT forbids the use of instruments?

    I've never had cake and pie to the Lord's supper.
    I think baptizing babies is a waste of time.
    I've never used incense in worship.

    The NT says nothing about wearing a coat and tie in worship. Do your men wear coat and ties? If so, they need to stop.
     
  4. God's Word is TRUTH

    God's Word is TRUTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    by saying sing it automatcally forbids it, when God told noah to use gopher wood he used gopher wood nothing more nothing less. if he used pine the boat wouldn't have worked. "but he didn't say that i couldn't use pine"

    my point exactly, we shouldn't "but the bible doesn't forbid it"

    we are talking about worship, we don't worship God by wearing clothes, but we do worship him by singing.

    God doesn't specify how to assemble or where to assemble, he doesn't specify what to wear or not to wear, you're just getting off point. He does how ever tell us how to worship Him, in spirit and in truth, by singing, praying, preaching, partaking of the lord's supper, and preaching(studying God's word).

    In Christian Love,

    Dustin
     
    #164 God's Word is TRUTH, Jul 23, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 23, 2006
  5. Gib

    Gib Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    27,256
    Likes Received:
    14
    You've never been able to justify your point. If you can show me specifically where the NT forbids instruments in worship, I will stop using them. Not where it doesn't say it, but where it does.
     
  6. gekko

    gekko New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    2,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    GWiT -

    God made music - he let David use music to glorify him in the OT - God does not change - God will be glorified by music anytime that it is of faith.

    you will not beable to prove your point. you operate off of opinion.

    that since it doesn't say it in the NT - we shouldn't do it.

    if i go and tell someone to go get in the shower - what do they do? well they get in the shower and turn the water on.

    but i didn't tell them to turn the water on - i said to get in the shower - nothing more nothing less.

    why did they turn the water on? well - water accompanies a shower - so they turned the water on.

    God wants us to sing. and so i sing while i play guitar. but God didn't tell me to play my stringed instrument.

    ITS COMMON SENSE THAT MUSIC ACCOMPANIES VOCALS.
    the only exception is accapella music.
    (caps for emphasis not yelling)

    but to have instrumental accompaniment is not sin. you havn't proven it.
     
  7. God's Word is TRUTH

    God's Word is TRUTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    ITS COMMON SENSE THAT MUSIC ACCOMPANIES VOCALS.
    the only exception is accapella music.
    (caps for emphasis not yelling)

    i don't know what your dicionary says but here is what mine says

    sing: to produce musical tones by means of the voice

    One of the strongest arguments against the use of instrumental music in Christian worship is the “silence” principle. This is the concept that when God is silent about a matter, man is not at liberty to <& /lib/dictionaryLink.mas, word => “presume” &>, and so to act without divine authority. There is no New Testament authority for the use of instrumental music in Christian worship.

    Is the “silence” argument valid? Yes it is. On many occasions in the Old Testament period, the Hebrews were prohibited from engaging in various forms of worship which God had “commanded not” (cf. Lev. 10:1; Dt. 17:3; Jer. 7:31).

    Additionally, the writer of the book of Hebrews plainly says that Jesus could not function as a priest while on earth (Heb. 8:4), because the Lord was from the tribe of Judah, and the law “spake nothing” (i.e., was silent) regarding priests from Judah (Heb. 7:14).

    For many years the Independent Christian Church has ridiculed this argument. These folks allege that silence is not prohibitive. One of the leaders of the movement is Given O. Blakely. In a recent issue of Banner of Truth (July, 1996), Blakely addressed the matter.


    "God’s silence is not a governing factor in matters pertaining to life and godliness. The whole idea of ‘silence,’ as those of the anti-instrumentalist position have used the term, requires the interpretation of fallible men. If God did not say it, then how can we be sure that men have said what He meant, but did not say? How dare mortal men to take upon themselves to thus unauthorizedly speak for God?"

    Here is Blakely’s point. We cannot use the “silence” argument, because God is silent about the silence argument. If God is silent about this form of argument, then it is unauthorized, and we dare not use it. That is the epitome of inconsistency.

    What shall be our response? In the first place, as indicated above, God has not been silent about the “silence” principle. One must not go beyond that which has been written (1 Cor. 4:6; 2 Jn. 9).

    Secondly, what sort of logic is the gentleman using? If one dare not employ the “silence” argument because the Scripture is silent about this sort of reasoning (and thus it is unauthorized) then, by the same token, one dare not use the instrument in Christian worship, because the New Testament is silent concerning the instrument, and thus it is unauthorized. Surely our friend needs to reconsider his position regarding the “silence” principle.


    In Christian Love,

    dustin
     
  8. Touchet1611

    Touchet1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2006
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Acts 17:24,25

    Acts 17:25 says that we can not worship God with our hands... also verse 24 is very applicable.

    We can only worship him in spirit and in truth.

    However, we can still sing praises unto Him and rejoice before Him and the use of instruments is fine - the problem arises when we sing / perform / play, etc. music that does not please Him - that is possible to know and understand. If it appeals to our flesh (rhythms, arrangements, jazz, rock, etc.) than it means nothing to God as it would quench and grieve the Holy Spirit...

    Just a thought!
     
  9. Eric B

    Eric B Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Messages:
    4,838
    Likes Received:
    5
    Obviously, there were universal laws and principles included in the Law that carry on. Killing and stealing have not become OK. You may say that is included in the "new law" now, but they obviously were apart of both, and hence universal.
    But you have not shown that instruments are specifically fixed to the OT, and for them to be so, they have to be temporary shadows of Christ.
     
  10. ktn4eg

    ktn4eg New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    4
    Wow! Close to 200 posts trashing or touting musical instruments in a worship service!!

    Boy, I'm sure this is REALLY helping to increase the number of lost folks you guys have been praying for and witnessing to, isn't it?

    (Assuming you guys do know about that Acts 1:8 passage. Let's see, now how does that passage go? Oh yes, now I remember!)
     
    #170 ktn4eg, Jul 24, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2006
  11. Eric B

    Eric B Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Messages:
    4,838
    Likes Received:
    5
    And if you can't find scriptures that prove that rock, jazz, etc necessarily feed the flesh, and that only "Japheth" music with little rhythm and plain arrangements are good, then you are worse than the Campbellists!
    It's scary how strongly youfeel about thus racial music issue that you have to inject it into the discussion even when it is basically OT.
    Hey, Aaron, now that you're back, why don't you go and check out this guy's site, and then tell me if your "style" issue is not racially charged to the core!

    Ktn4eg, you have to understand that in this world of religious oneupmanship, people exalting their own sectarian and/or cultural traditions IS seen as saving the lost! After all, people who use instuments are lost to one group, and people with too much rhythm are either lost or backslidden, and will only give the lost a false conversion according to the other group!
    I think an even more pertinent scripture is the one about those who preach Christ only out of envy and strife!
     
    #171 Eric B, Jul 24, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2006
  12. gekko

    gekko New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    2,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    GWiT - you ignored the rest of my post.
    ---

    i read this morning in psalms that David praised God with the harp. also that David sang unto the Lord with instruments.

    Psalms 33:2 - Praise the LORD with harp: sing unto him with the psaltery and an instrument of ten strings.

    Psalms 71:22 - I will also praise thee with the psaltery, even thy truth, O my God: unto thee will I sing with the harp, O thou Holy One of Israel.

    Psalms 98:5 - Sing unto the LORD with the harp; with the harp, and the voice of a psalm.

    Psalms 147:7 - Sing unto the LORD with thanksgiving; sing praise upon the harp unto our God

    just a few from the psalms. seems David meant singing more then just voice. resonance as well.

    so i will sing praises unto God with my stringed instrument with voice - for God has not changed - He is the same yesterday - today - and forever.

    GWiT - you have got no scriptural support that having instruments alone - or instruments with vocals - is sin.

    you merely pose with an opinion based on sand. sorry.

    Psalms 150:3 - Praise him with the sound of the trumpet: praise him with the psaltery and harp.
     
  13. God's Word is TRUTH

    God's Word is TRUTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    okay as i posted earlier the psalms are part of the law that was taken away. even Jesus himself said that the psalms were part of the law. actually it doesn't say just say sing, it says they sang with something, they mentioned what musical instrument of music they used. so sing still means vocal only unless you mention what instrument you use with singing. yes God is the same yesterday, today and forever but his covanent isn't the same, about the shower thing, a shower always involves water, singing never involves instruments unless it is stated.

    I have a question. Do you believe we need authority from the scriptures for how we worship God?

    In Christian Love,

    dustin
     
  14. God's Word is TRUTH

    God's Word is TRUTH New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2006
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    yes some of the laws are still in effect but why? because Jesus Christ gave us the commands in the new testament, and from the inspired writers of the new testament. we follow all the commands we follow today that are from the old law because they were repeated in the new law. musical instruments were not repeated.

    In Christian Love,

    Dustin
     
  15. ktn4eg

    ktn4eg New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    4
    NOTE TO ERIC B:

    Yes, and people who have never heard the saving Gospel of Jesus Christ's death, burial, and resurrection are......

    S-T-I-L-L

    G-O-I-N-G

    T-O

    S-P-E-N-D

    A-N

    E-T-E-R-N-I-T-Y

    ......in a place the Bible calls

    H - E - L - L !!!!!!!!!!!



    I've searched the Book of Acts and the Epistles and Revelation, and I simply cannot find where fellows like the Apostle Paul risked life and limb to spread the message of eternal damnation to those lost souls because they either chose or did not choose to employ instrumental music or the lack thereof.


    OTOH, there are passages such as this:

    8 We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but not in despair;
    9 Persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed:
    10 Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life of Jesus might be made made manifest in our body.

    ----2 Corinthians 4:8-10
     
  16. Gib

    Gib Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    27,256
    Likes Received:
    14
    And yet you have posted twice, off topic. Why don't you start a thread about worthless debates and it's effect on the lost.
     
  17. gekko

    gekko New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    2,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    uh. the psalms are not part of any law. get that into your head.

    what was taken away was the carnal ordinances and traditions of men when Christ died on the cross - Hebrews explains that more. i think its hebrews 9 or something.

    but you'll just be stubborn about it and not abide by God's law - which will get you nowhere fast.

    Jesus supported and encouraged everybody to obey the law. can't you understand that?

    psalms is not part of any law - can't you understand that? gosh. some people's kids.

    you claim Jesus said that the psalms were part of the law - where do you find that?

    a shower does not always involve water - you think it does because everybody else gets in the shower and turns the water on - we've all been following everybody else like a herd of cattle - they turn on the water in the shower - so we think that a shower should always involve water. but it doesn't. you can get in the shower - and then stand there for 5 minutes - and then get out. look at that - you were in the shower area without water.

    you've been stubborn for the past 18 pages - trying to get people to believe in your opinion.

    if anybody wants to check out some music i recorded you can do so at: www.myspace.com/acousticwaves - hopefully a new song will be posted within a week or so. it's gonna be great.

    praise the Lord with your instruments those who have instruments! everything we do may it be in faith towards God Almighty.

    Any musicians out there... ready to virtually jam? --> [​IMG]
     
  18. SaggyWoman

    SaggyWoman Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2000
    Messages:
    17,933
    Likes Received:
    10
    I can worship God with instruments without his command to do so. It is out of a heart of willingness to worship.
     
  19. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    GWIT said:

    by saying sing it automatcally forbids it, when God told noah to use gopher wood he used gopher wood nothing more nothing less.

    Wrong again.

    Point 1: If the command is to use "gopher wood," then the use of "pine wood" directly contradicts the command, because to the extent that Noah would have used pine, he would have failed to use gopher.

    Point 2: On the other hand, the Bible does not record God telling Noah how to fasten the gopher wood together, for example, with nails, screws, dowels, or spit and baling wire. We can infer (unless God gave other unrecorded instructions to Noah) that he was free to use whatever method he wished, and that it was not a violation of the command to make use of mechanical fasteners of any kind.

    The command to "sing" is closer to point 2 than point 1, because just as nails are a tool to aid building with wood, instruments are an aid to singing. One does not fail to sing by singing to an accompaniment. Therefore, the command is not the same as the example in Point 1.

    Basic logic 101. You have commited a clear categorical error. This has been pointed out to you already. Your failure to acknowledge this is evidence not of our being mistaken, but of you being a sophist.
     
    #179 Ransom, Jul 24, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2006
  20. Eric B

    Eric B Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 26, 2001
    Messages:
    4,838
    Likes Received:
    5
    That is not true. All of the prohibitions against all the different types of incest are not repeated in the NT. But we know by principle, and the spirit of the Law that they are still sinful.
    The use of instruments were not points of the law, so they do not "pass away" with the Law.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...