That's absurd. It is absent because it is not there. How can I show you what is not There?Which has nothing to do with your unproven assumption that penal substitution (as we define it) is absent from Scripture. To call our view a philosophy is to further beg the same question you’ve been begging all along.
The Archangel
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is up to the one who holds to the Theory to prove the Theory.