• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dog House Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Pre or post ban. I'm actually new here.

Either way, I've enjoyed reading the threads here. You guys crack me up with the "Ah! I've been slandered!" stuff sometimes. I can't fathom going to some other board to cry about someone on BB calling me names.

What they are doing is trying to justify their behavior. It happens here with many fo them. If you point out their behavior they will automatically go to the old faithful response "well so and so did it to me that makes you all hypocritical" It is a common theme.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
What they are doing is trying to justify their behavior. It happens here with many fo them. If you point out their behavior they will automatically go to the old faithful response "well so and so did it to me that makes you all hypocritical" It is a common theme.
Who from the DogHouse has said that here?

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
P4T in post # 34 and you in post # 37
Well, I wasn't defending myself I was pointing out the hypocrisy of thread. I see what you are saying now. It is OK for the BB to call names, but not the DH???? You have just proved Internet Theologians post.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
P4T in post # 34 and you in post # 37
Something is wrong if you think it is OK for us to call P4T an atheist on this board, but get bent all out of shape if P4T says something about someone on the other site.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

matt wade

Well-Known Member
Something is wrong if you think it is OK for us to call P4T an atheist on this board, but get bent all out of shape if P4T says something about someone on the other site.

RevMitchell hasn't called him an atheist. I did. You won't find where I've complained about what they post on the other forum. No hypocrisy here.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
RevMitchell hasn't called him an atheist. I did. You won't find where I've complained about what they post on the other forum. No hypocrisy here.
Yes, I know it was you. But Rev is defending you actions. That is hypocrisy. He pointed out me quoting you saying that in an attempt to me being called a name(which I wasn't called a name and never claimed I was) and then defending myself with your post.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Something is wrong if you think it is OK for us to call P4T an atheist on this board, but get bent all out of shape if P4T says something about someone on the other site.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

I did not say it was ok. In fact I have never seen that post. Just more obfuscation of the issue int his thread. A poor attempt to justify this sin.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, I know it was you. But Rev is defending you actions. That is hypocrisy. He pointed out me quoting you saying that in an attempt to me being called a name(which I wasn't called a name and never claimed I was).

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

I have never defended his actions and knew nothing about it. You are now bearing false witness.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I did not say it was ok. In fact I have never seen that post. Just more obfuscation of the issue int his thread. A poor attempt to justify this sin.
You quoted me from this post discussing it. It is on this thread. How could you have not seen it????? Surely you are reading the posts on your thread

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Here is the 1st post regarding the issue Rev....
I for one am glad Preacher4Truth is gone from this board. I believe that he was nothing more than an atheist posing as a hyper-cal in order to troll this board. There was no evidence of the fruits of the Spirit in him.



Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First you need to provide the post I made saying it was ok. Second you need to go back and read my post # 29. Third your behavior here trying to justify and obfuscate the issue in this thread is shameful. Defending this sin is just shameful.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I have never defended his actions and knew nothing about it. You are now bearing false witness.
You claimed I was defending my actions my pointing his actions. Now you say you didn't know about it???

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You claimed I was defending my actions my pointing his actions. Now you say you didn't know about it???

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

That is not what I said you need to go back and read my posts. I mentioned no on in specific and you have mentioned a number of things about this board. I simply spoke in general. Further I made it clear that this thread was not about personalities and personal attacks in post 29. Stop twisting my words.

You still haven't prided the post where I defended his claims about P4T (aka Internet Theologian). Waiting.....
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First you need to provide the post I made saying it was ok. Second you need to go back and read my post # 29. Third your behavior here trying to justify and obfuscate the issue in this thread is shameful. Defending this sin is just shameful.
#37, combined #42 I think. You pointed out my behavior to just me calling names or perhaps just bad behavior in general, by point to other behavior. You however failed to show me calling others names. The post you linked to this board of me was me saying how funny a Spurgeon video was. So how was I justifying that behavior by pointing to Matt Wade??? Why would I need to justify it???

You need to apply your post #29 to this board before you apply it to another.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
First you need to provide the post I made saying it was ok. Second you need to go back and read my post # 29. Third your behavior here trying to justify and obfuscate the issue in this thread is shameful. Defending this sin is just shameful.
I have not attempted to justify anything. I am just pointing out that we do the same thing on this board. There is more name calling on our board here, then over there.

*for YOU to ignore that is just shameful* If name calling or putting ones point of view down upsets you, start on the BB. Not the DH.
Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
#37, combined #42 I think. You pointed out my behavior to just me calling names or perhaps just bad behavior in general, by point to other behavior. You however failed to show me calling others names. The post you linked to this board of me was me saying how funny a Spurgeon video was. So how was I justifying that behavior by pointing to Matt Wade??? Why would I need to justify it???

You need to apply your post #29 to this board before you apply it to another.

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Just stop. You are spending so much time spinning the behavior of the other board you cannot even keep your claims straight. I am done with you. You have been exposed along with others. The only reasonable response at this time is your repentance. Let me know when that is and I will be glad to further discuss things with you.
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
McCree79, do you think speaking disparagingly about a member of one forum on a separate forum is proper conduct?



(I have had no luck deleting this guy with the sunglasses, so I guess he staysCool)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top