https://www.amazon.com/Misreading-S...1589922715&sprefix=misreading+,aps,285&sr=8-1
Digest....
grow....
learn.
Digest....
grow....
learn.
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Downgrade at Southern Seminary: Higher Criticism (Part I)
- Thread starter Revmitchell
- Start date
Oh the arrogance
You can't define what "It" is.
I watched it carefully and fully and thoughtfully.
You are just saying "NO TAIN'T SO" at this point.
I disagree with you Mithchell, and the good doctor, and I've expressed why I do. Put your big-girl panties on and deal with it.
Oh, the stupidity....
We can go around in circles like that if you want.
Uh no will leave you to your misery
Seriously???
I'm not "miserable".
I know you're grasping.
A video from the arch-Calvinist "Founders" group got you up in arms. I wonder if you even watched the video enough to KNOW it was from the Founders Ministries...That's an arch-Calvinist group which is trying to subvert the same SBC you love, Mark.
Now, rather than respond to my critiques, you simply insult.
My critiques are reasoned.....I'm starting to think you didn't even carefully watch the video all the way through.
Did you?
I'm not "miserable".
I know you're grasping.
A video from the arch-Calvinist "Founders" group got you up in arms. I wonder if you even watched the video enough to KNOW it was from the Founders Ministries...That's an arch-Calvinist group which is trying to subvert the same SBC you love, Mark.
Now, rather than respond to my critiques, you simply insult.
My critiques are reasoned.....I'm starting to think you didn't even carefully watch the video all the way through.
Did you?
Give me a break You have been completely insulting. Further your adhominem does nothing to address the content. Also you know nothing about my views on the SBC. You continue to mind read here and make assumptions.
Your critique was shallow and completely misrepresented what Dr. Fuller said. Hence I asked you if you actually watched the video in full or to learn what he actually meant rather than to disprove.
The misery in which I speak is a result of your insults.
I have been insulting...but, no more than you have.
I've engaged in no ad-hominems.
I know a LOT about your views on the SBC...you debate them here regularly.
I read this forum far more than I post on it.
No, I read your posts...I've been reading your posts for nearly a decade.
I know what your views are on SBC. Actually, I respect your desire to resurrect, protect and defend what you think is right in the SBC.
You see, you know what is good in the SBC...that is, the thousands of churches which are honestly godly, Christ-honoring and full of wonderful Bible-believing Christians who want to do what is right and also have no truck with liberalism...
I don't know EXACTLY where you grew up, and had your early education....but, I know it was quite close to mine.
I grew up in a Bible-Believing SBC Church in Ocala Florida.
I DO know you Mitchell.
Then explain HOW it misrepresented him...I'll stand for fair debate. Fuller had the opportunity to lambast another not there to defend themselves, and Founders (heretics) was there to pile on.
If my critique was unfair....fine...explain HOW.
Don't just insult and trash believers.
You NEVER asked if I watched the video in full...
You assumed I didn't, and posted with the assumption I didn't
I absolutely did....very slowly and critically.....TWICE before I posted anything.
I know what he meant....Did YOU even know it was a Founders slander???
Tell me honestly, did YOU watch the video?
It was a Founders Ministries slander.
Did YOU even know that???
I did, because I actually watched it, and with a critical eye.
Put your big girl pants on.
And on that note I will leave you to your misery
Rev.....
You didn’t actually watch the video you posted did you?
I’ve asked numerous times, and you refuse to answer.... Did you even watch the video?
Did you know it was a Founders Ministries slander?
You didn’t actually watch the video you posted did you?
I’ve asked numerous times, and you refuse to answer.... Did you even watch the video?
Did you know it was a Founders Ministries slander?
To be fair to Dr. Hernandez
Are you saying that there is a problem with Bob Jones University.
Hernandez avoided explicit replies in my opinion. Fuller should land a better job in the long run after being railroaded and cheated out of his severance by the SBC.
Do you hold to full or limited biblical inspiration view?
The needs to shut down any liberalism, and also to watch out for Charismatic Chaos!
It does sound like Fuller's firing might have been questionable.
Postmodernism in Dr. Jonathan Pennington’s Writings
In Dr. Al Mohler’s attempt at damage control, Southern Seminary has released two video responses to Dr. Russel Fuller’s first and second whistle-blower interviews. In the first video, concerning the writings of Dr. Dominick Hernandez, which reflect a higher critical view, Dr. Hernandez essentially contradicts some of his own writings without recanting or apologizing for them.
You can find the related documents, including Dr. Fuller’s compilation of concerns here: Dr. Dominick Hernandez Documents.
In the second video, Dr. Jonathan Pennington, who has advocated a kind of postmodernism for years, essentially answers irrelevant questions with standard orthodox answers. Rather than contradict his former work, he seemingly obfuscates the actual issues by dwelling on the perimeter of Dr. Fuller’s concerns while carefully evading them.
Pennington’s stated belief is that “evangelical hermeneutics is so driven to prove the verifiability and reliability” due to possible insecurity and fearing the “loss of authority of the Bible.” Paper 1, 10
Postmodernism in Dr. Jonathan Pennington's Writings - Enemies Within: The Church
In Dr. Al Mohler’s attempt at damage control, Southern Seminary has released two video responses to Dr. Russel Fuller’s first and second whistle-blower interviews. In the first video, concerning the writings of Dr. Dominick Hernandez, which reflect a higher critical view, Dr. Hernandez essentially contradicts some of his own writings without recanting or apologizing for them.
You can find the related documents, including Dr. Fuller’s compilation of concerns here: Dr. Dominick Hernandez Documents.
In the second video, Dr. Jonathan Pennington, who has advocated a kind of postmodernism for years, essentially answers irrelevant questions with standard orthodox answers. Rather than contradict his former work, he seemingly obfuscates the actual issues by dwelling on the perimeter of Dr. Fuller’s concerns while carefully evading them.
Pennington’s stated belief is that “evangelical hermeneutics is so driven to prove the verifiability and reliability” due to possible insecurity and fearing the “loss of authority of the Bible.” Paper 1, 10
Postmodernism in Dr. Jonathan Pennington's Writings - Enemies Within: The Church
Published on May 25, 2020
In the third and final installment of the "Downgrade at Southern Seminary" series, Russell Fuller talks about Jarvis Williams and Matthew Hall's critical theory laced teachings and the effect they have had on some students. He also recounts the story of Dr. Albert Mohler's aggressive support, in a faculty meeting, for Matthew Hall's promotion to the position of provost, despite opposition over critical theory. Fuller also reveals the stipulations of the "separation agreement" and challenges any members of the faculty at Southern Seminary to debate him on the merits of his concerns.
In the third and final installment of the "Downgrade at Southern Seminary" series, Russell Fuller talks about Jarvis Williams and Matthew Hall's critical theory laced teachings and the effect they have had on some students. He also recounts the story of Dr. Albert Mohler's aggressive support, in a faculty meeting, for Matthew Hall's promotion to the position of provost, despite opposition over critical theory. Fuller also reveals the stipulations of the "separation agreement" and challenges any members of the faculty at Southern Seminary to debate him on the merits of his concerns.
Last edited:
"All they can do is go after me personally because they cannot go after the substance." Dr. Fuller
And that is what we are seeing in this thread as well as what Dr. Mohler did to Dr. Fuller
And that is what we are seeing in this thread as well as what Dr. Mohler did to Dr. Fuller
In Dr. Al Mohler’s attempt at damage control, Southern Seminary has released two video responses to Dr. Russel Fuller’s first and second whistle-blower interviews. In the first video, concerning the writings of Dr. Dominick Hernandez, which reflect a higher critical view, Dr. Hernandez essentially contradicts some of his own writings without recanting or apologizing for them.
You can find the related documents, including Dr. Fuller’s compilation of concerns here: Dr. Dominick Hernandez Documents.
In the second video, Dr. Jonathan Pennington, who has advocated a kind of postmodernism for years, essentially answers irrelevant questions with standard orthodox answers. Rather than contradict his former work, he seemingly obfuscates the actual issues by dwelling on the perimeter of Dr. Fuller’s concerns while carefully evading them.
Pennington’s stated belief is that “evangelical hermeneutics is so driven to prove the verifiability and reliability” due to possible insecurity and fearing the “loss of authority of the Bible.” Paper 1, 10
Postmodernism in Dr. Jonathan Pennington's Writings - Enemies Within: The Church
You can find the related documents, including Dr. Fuller’s compilation of concerns here: Dr. Dominick Hernandez Documents.
In the second video, Dr. Jonathan Pennington, who has advocated a kind of postmodernism for years, essentially answers irrelevant questions with standard orthodox answers. Rather than contradict his former work, he seemingly obfuscates the actual issues by dwelling on the perimeter of Dr. Fuller’s concerns while carefully evading them.
Pennington’s stated belief is that “evangelical hermeneutics is so driven to prove the verifiability and reliability” due to possible insecurity and fearing the “loss of authority of the Bible.” Paper 1, 10
Postmodernism in Dr. Jonathan Pennington's Writings - Enemies Within: The Church