Steadfast Fred
Active Member
Spurgeon drank beer.
I am familiar with Spurgeon. He preached against alcohol and clearly stated in one of his sermons that he did not drink.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Spurgeon drank beer.
I'll agree there is no good in seeing movies, and I will never fight for anyone's "right" to go see one.Your logic is faulty. Follow the following anecdote to see how.
There is no good that comes from going to the movies. It doesn't build character, it helps no one in Christian virtue, it doesn't promote the Kingdom of God or the Gospel.
But the damage that has been done by something that so naturally lends itself to abuse is unquestionable. What's worse, those who've been saved out of it, and testify of it, and will no longer touch it are marginalized as unspiritual, legalistic, ignorant and superstitious.
Now tell me again how holy and righteous your movie going is...
You could replace the word wine with a plethora of different things that bring us pleasure and make the exactly the same faulty argument.
BTW, movie going is abused- look at the horrible, blasphemous movies that people go to every week. If you would never go to ANY movie you would never be tempted to go to a bad one. And it is abused by people going to often, spending money that should be going to the kingdom, spending time that could be spent doing beneficial things, etc...
And there are MANY IFB type people who testify to being saved from going to the theater. Some of whom give testimonies about the negative effect it has had on their minds and their families, etc...
With all things that Scripture does not condemn we should be cautious and moderate. That is the sensible position on wine.
If I drank 2 beers*, in one (1) hour, my blood alcohol content would be ~.0266**
After having said drinks, I could get on the road and drive and be well under the legal limit of .08
According to BAC charts, 2 beers would have you at .03 to .04 with driving skills significantly affected (if you are between 220 and 230 pounds)
I just went to http://www.bloodalcoholcalculator.org/ and plugged in 220 lbs., 2 beers, 1 hour and I got 0.02% - NOT IMPAIRED.
Then I went to http://www.ou.edu/oupd/bac.htm and plugged in the same numbers, got the same percentage result and yet it said "Possible Impairment"
Finally I went to http://www.globalrph.com/bac.cgi and plugged in the same numbers yet again and got 0.028% with "No loss of coordination, slight euphoria and loss of shyness. Depressant effects are not apparent. Mildly relaxed and maybe a little lightheaded. Behavior nearly normal by ordinary observation. Other: Some loss of judgment. Relaxation. Slight body warmth. Altered mood."
So your numbers are wrong.
1 Timothy 3:8 Likewise must the deacons be grave, not doubletongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre;
Titus 2:3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things.
HankD
According to BAC charts, 2 beers would have you at .03 to .04 with driving skills significantly affected (if you are between 220 and 230 pounds)
I am familiar with Spurgeon. He preached against alcohol and clearly stated in one of his sermons that he did not drink.
Yes. the Catholic Church did many godless things for hundreds of years. (yes.. that was being funny)
However, just because the church for hundreds of years held to salvation through works.. should we continue there in?
FYI....I am 230 lbs & I can have 2 beers in one hour without so much as a belch. now I will tend to urinate more but you know what they say about beer dont you...
Well, the reformers and those later drank.
And members of the early church drank.
Not quite accurateWhile it is spoken of good terms at times it is more often acquainted with harm, folly, judgment, and sin.
It seems prudence should be used when in determining if drinking is potentially a good idea.. even if it is allowed.
he points at me with his finger, just so, and says, "What doest thou here, Elijah? Sitting with the ungodly; and you a member of a church, and breaking your pastor's heart. I'm ashamed of you! I wouldn't break my pastor's heart, I'm sure." And then he walks away. Well, I did feel angry; but I knew it was all true, and I was guilty; so I put down my pipe, and did not touch my beer, but hurried away to a lonely spot, and cast myself down before the Lord, confessing my sin and begging for forgiveness.
You seem to ignore the historical record that others did not.
If I drank 2 beers*, in one (1) hour, my blood alcohol content would be ~.0266**
After having said drinks, I could get on the road and drive and be well under the legal limit of .08.
See, the difference is, Nightshift, that God not only allows alcohol but has told us it's a blessing. So we need to keep it in perspective.
But you are right - there is a lot of abuse of alcohol and we need to prayerfully consider our liberty in drinking. Both my husband and I have no problem with drinking but we have chosen not to drink in deference of the college students we work with and those who are in our congregation who have struggled with alcohol. But we will never tell anyone that God condemns drinking because He doesn't and to say so would be adding to Scripture and that's not a good thing.
But is drinking a part of salvation? Is it something that God required of Israel or the disciples? Does Jesus say 'Go forth and serve good wine to all nations and make wine-drinkers of them all"? None of the above. At most it is a pleasant drink that people are allowed to have. Defending alcohol use is not like defending the faith, though it's hard to tell sometimes!
Done.