Drone sees Russian base in Ukraine

[poncho]

Ukraine does not belong to Russia and suffered a genocide at the hands of Russia. Ukraine has their own language, their own Eastern Orthodox Church, and their own culture. Ukraine is a separate country from Russia.

Russians have never apologized for the holocaust that they caused in the Ukraine.

Putin is a psychopathic murderer along the order of Stalin and Russians do not want to live in Russia, which is the largest country in the world. Putin is a creep.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Dn-ZhWBWfs

Uh yeah, you keep telling me all this but it's not answering my question.

Look it's real simple. Either you believe ethnic Russian Ukrainians (Ukrainian citizens) have a right to live in the land they were born and raised or you don't.

Which is it? Quit dodging, ducking, weaving and repeating the same thing over and over and answer the question.

One more time.

Do ethnic Russian Ukrainians have a "right" to be in Ukraine? Yes or no?

 

[church mouse guy]

Ay Chihuahua, Bad Emir Putout, KKKGB boss, sounds like Herr Adolph on September 1, 1939. Soon the komrades have to ask if puttin' lard on bread on Sunday cause time warp. Will comrades eat at trough with Germans again?

 

[poncho]

Ay Chihuahua, Bad Emir Putout, KKKGB boss, sounds like Herr Adolph on September 1, 1939. Soon the komrades have to ask if puttin' lard on bread on Sunday cause time warp. Will comrades eat at trough with Germans again?

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=101251

 

[poncho]

Who slipped? How fake report on ‘Russian soldier deaths’ in Ukraine set MSM on fire

A Forbes report on alleged Russian army casualties in Ukraine citing a dodgy Russian website has sparked a media and Twitter storm. Some said Russia had “finally slipped” with the leak on its troops in Ukraine; others were baffled by the “fake publication.” RT decided to investigate.

< snip >

“Two days of Western officials retweeting a Forbes report quoting a Ukrainian web-site quoting a non-existent Russia news web-site re Ukraine,” she added.

“The main problem here is, of course, where was the Forbes online editor when the story was published, why nobody bothered to check sources?”

< snip >

RT could not immediately confirm the identity of the contact – something which apparently did not stop Western news outlets from citing the claims.

This is not the sole example of unverified information related to the Ukrainian conflict appearing on the web. However, few such “leaks” make it to big media.

In one of the instances, US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt was caught posting unverified images on his Twitter feed in September 2014. The photos, which he said showed US-Kiev military exercises in Ukraine, had already been published in July 2014 and in October 2013.

In another case in April, Pyatt claimed that Russia’s military was continuing to expand its presence in eastern Ukraine. As proof, he posted a picture of a Buk-M2 missile defense system that he said was stationed in Ukraine. However, it turned out to be a two-year-old photo from an air show near Moscow.


http://www.rt.com/news/313653-russia...s-fake-forbes/

https://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=101251

Senator Inhofe Shows Fake Photos of Ukraine War

Video of Sen. James Inhofe presenting photographs to the Senate on Feb. 11 of what he said were Russian tanks in Ukraine last year. Two of… read more

http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4528166/senator-inhofe-shows-fake-photos-ukraine-war

You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on. George W. Bush

 

[poncho]

BUSTED! Establishment Media Caught Faking News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyEGZxCEXUo

More old photos recycled to fit the narrative.

How do you explain all these fake photos and reports CMG?

Nevermind I know . . . default back to the first characteristic of propaganda.

1) It Prevents Dialogue.

“To be effective, propaganda cannot be concerned with detail... Propaganda ceases where simple dialogue begins… it does not tolerate discussion; by its very nature, it excludes contradiction and discussion.”