I saw the movie "Dunkirk" at an IMAX theater. Directed by Christopher Nolan (Dark Knight series, Inception, Interstellar, Memento) this movie is being heavily praised. This is high quality filmmaking to be sure, but strangely, it lacks a story with a human element and therefore it is difficult to relate to. I give it 3 out of 4 stars. If it had characters that we knew more about then just their names and cared about this would easily be a 4 out of 4 star movie. Also, the movie narrative was disjointed. More on that later.
The movie is beautifully shot. The larger IMAX screen with surround sound made an impact. The most impressive shots are the aerial shots and wide, panorama shots. Just fantastic. On the other hand, there are frequent close-ups, the camera inches away from people's faces. One extended scene of a group of soldiers hiding in a beached trawler that was under attack was particularly claustrophobic. This technique wore on me after a while. Still, there has to be an Oscar nomination for cinematography for this film. Probably an Oscar win.
The soundtrack seemed to be way overdriven and there was always some loud, tense background pulsing amping up the tension that was relentless. Gunshots are overly loud, bombs dropping blocks away seem to be right next to you, torpedoes ripping through ships is crazily loud, etc. The sound of bombs screaming as they fell from German Stuka dive bombers was especially harrowing to me. If you don't like loud noises and sounds, this isn't your movie. There is literally not one moment of silence until the last scene of the movie.
Technically, for production, the movie gets an A+. Sadly, the story, if you can call it that, was lacking. This movie seems like a "found footage" movie that was spliced together and plays like a newsreel. We never get to know a single character. There really isn't any characters, just soldiers, pilots, and sailors. This is the missing component, the flaw in an otherwise extremely well made movie. The audience has no one to relate to. Rather, they get pummeled by bombs, bullets, explosions, etc. for almost two hours.
There are three segments to the movie--an army guy who is trying to get on a boat to get back to England, a civilian and his son who are running their pleasure yacht over to Dunkirk from England to pick up soldiers and bring them back, and a Spitfire pilot who is trying to shoot down German bombers before they can take out the "sitting duck" ships and boats at Dunkirk.
A major problem I had with the storytelling (again, I use the word loosely) besides no characterization is the flow of the movie--time is disjointed, either compressed or extended depending on which guy the movie happens to be concentrating on. For example, the army guy trying to get on a ship takes five days to tell his "story". The civilian on the yacht story takes about a day to tell (though it shouldn't have) and the Spitfire pilot's "story" occurs over the space of about an hour. Yet, all three threads are woven into the story as if they were happening simultaneously. You go from an aerial battle scene in bright sunlight to a night scene on a destroyer docked off shore, then to an early morning scene on the yacht. Honestly, it's what, 25 miles from Dover to Dunkirk and the yacht portion of the movie takes the entire movie just to get over there. I'm thinking as I'm watching these guys should be there by now, especially since we've seen two days and two nights in the army guy thread. Very disorienting.
Having recently re-watched "Saving Private Ryan" and watching the HBO miniseries "Band of Brothers" I've got a good idea of what a real war purports to look and sound like.. "Dunkirk" doubles down on this authenticity. The (over)use of extreme facial closeups and overly loud battle sounds drives home the feeling of actually being in a war. There is no explicit bloody gore like in SPR or BoB, but there are graphic scenes of bodies being blown away and ships being blown up and sunk. I only counted one "F-Bomb" and surprisingly little cussing. A couple of complaints. There are destroyers with anti-aircraft guns anchored off shore of Dunkirk. The destroyers are targets of the Nazi bombers. Yet in scene after scene they show bombers approaching the destroyers and not once is an anti-aircraft gun used. Are the gunners not searching the skies for bombers? I thought that was inexplicable. Also, it seemed way too easy for Nazi fighters to "sneak up" on the Spitfires patrolling the area. I know there was no radar on the Spitfires but really? Also, can't the Spitfire pilots radio the destroyers and tell them to ready the anti-aircraft guns?
Bottom line--extremely well made cinema experience that bombards the audience with the sights and sounds of warfare. Scant story line.
The movie is beautifully shot. The larger IMAX screen with surround sound made an impact. The most impressive shots are the aerial shots and wide, panorama shots. Just fantastic. On the other hand, there are frequent close-ups, the camera inches away from people's faces. One extended scene of a group of soldiers hiding in a beached trawler that was under attack was particularly claustrophobic. This technique wore on me after a while. Still, there has to be an Oscar nomination for cinematography for this film. Probably an Oscar win.
The soundtrack seemed to be way overdriven and there was always some loud, tense background pulsing amping up the tension that was relentless. Gunshots are overly loud, bombs dropping blocks away seem to be right next to you, torpedoes ripping through ships is crazily loud, etc. The sound of bombs screaming as they fell from German Stuka dive bombers was especially harrowing to me. If you don't like loud noises and sounds, this isn't your movie. There is literally not one moment of silence until the last scene of the movie.
Technically, for production, the movie gets an A+. Sadly, the story, if you can call it that, was lacking. This movie seems like a "found footage" movie that was spliced together and plays like a newsreel. We never get to know a single character. There really isn't any characters, just soldiers, pilots, and sailors. This is the missing component, the flaw in an otherwise extremely well made movie. The audience has no one to relate to. Rather, they get pummeled by bombs, bullets, explosions, etc. for almost two hours.
There are three segments to the movie--an army guy who is trying to get on a boat to get back to England, a civilian and his son who are running their pleasure yacht over to Dunkirk from England to pick up soldiers and bring them back, and a Spitfire pilot who is trying to shoot down German bombers before they can take out the "sitting duck" ships and boats at Dunkirk.
A major problem I had with the storytelling (again, I use the word loosely) besides no characterization is the flow of the movie--time is disjointed, either compressed or extended depending on which guy the movie happens to be concentrating on. For example, the army guy trying to get on a ship takes five days to tell his "story". The civilian on the yacht story takes about a day to tell (though it shouldn't have) and the Spitfire pilot's "story" occurs over the space of about an hour. Yet, all three threads are woven into the story as if they were happening simultaneously. You go from an aerial battle scene in bright sunlight to a night scene on a destroyer docked off shore, then to an early morning scene on the yacht. Honestly, it's what, 25 miles from Dover to Dunkirk and the yacht portion of the movie takes the entire movie just to get over there. I'm thinking as I'm watching these guys should be there by now, especially since we've seen two days and two nights in the army guy thread. Very disorienting.
Having recently re-watched "Saving Private Ryan" and watching the HBO miniseries "Band of Brothers" I've got a good idea of what a real war purports to look and sound like.. "Dunkirk" doubles down on this authenticity. The (over)use of extreme facial closeups and overly loud battle sounds drives home the feeling of actually being in a war. There is no explicit bloody gore like in SPR or BoB, but there are graphic scenes of bodies being blown away and ships being blown up and sunk. I only counted one "F-Bomb" and surprisingly little cussing. A couple of complaints. There are destroyers with anti-aircraft guns anchored off shore of Dunkirk. The destroyers are targets of the Nazi bombers. Yet in scene after scene they show bombers approaching the destroyers and not once is an anti-aircraft gun used. Are the gunners not searching the skies for bombers? I thought that was inexplicable. Also, it seemed way too easy for Nazi fighters to "sneak up" on the Spitfires patrolling the area. I know there was no radar on the Spitfires but really? Also, can't the Spitfire pilots radio the destroyers and tell them to ready the anti-aircraft guns?
Bottom line--extremely well made cinema experience that bombards the audience with the sights and sounds of warfare. Scant story line.
Last edited:
