DHK'2069707 said:
Note your own rejection; your own unbelief; your resistance to the Holy Spirit, etc. This is not Calvinism. You chose to reject Christ.
Here's what I said:
Then along the way I became a member of a cult. following my biological mother, that taught salvation is to be a member of the church, THEIR church, and Jesus Christ was not God, just a special man with a special mission from God.
THAT is what I rejected.
Why do you need to take statements out of context just so you can disprove the doctrine of election ? I HAVE NOT REJECTED CHRIST. Not as God-Man, not as anything that I learned about Him under Roman Catholicism.
PLEASE, do not misrepresent what I say.
DHK'2069707 said:
Had you died at this point you would not be one of "the elect," so-called. The responsibility is on you to choose Christ as your Savior. It is only of the mercy of God that he extended the length of your life and arranged the circumstances of your life so that you were able to do that.
On the contrary, everything points to my being one of God's elect, even beyond this point, on to my embrace of atheism.
In fact, I am strongly inclined to say that at some point in my childhood, God quickened me, because the sight of my paternal grandmother taking me to the cathedral so she could kiss the hand of a wooden black nazarene made me rebel to the point of my one day asking her if Jesus is in heaven, then why is he always shown as dead ?
DHK'2069707 said:
I don't know, but you ought to. When were you married? Do you remember that occasion? I certainly remember when I got married--who I got married to; the people that were there (most of them), the one who married us, the place, the time, etc. It was an important event.
I also remember a far more important event--when I became a part of the bride of Christ; when He became my bridegroom, who was there, the date, time, place, what happened. It is an important event in my life. I should be able to remember it.
I am sure the Philippian jailer remembered the time of his salvation, as the Ethiopian Eunuch did his. They were both very eventful days.
There is where I part ways with most of you here on this board, even of those of my own earthly family.
Yours is based on experience, remembrance.
Without them you cannot trust God's mercy and grace, though you speak of these from the other side of your mouth.
Unarguably, salvation is an eventful time.
It was an eventful time for me when I realized that DESPITE WHAT I HAVE BEEN, WHAT EVILS I HAVE COMMITTED, God's mercy had always been far deeper and greater than all of them combined a thousand times.
It was an eventful time for me when the New Testament I read showed me that all the laws of God I've broken were laid on Christ.
It was an eventful time for me when the Spirit revealed to me, in that kitchen where I read that New Testament page to page in less than a week, that if the trumpet had sounded that very first hour I began to read, I would be taken up.
It was an eventful time for my wife when I told her we were going to church, in fact, a very eventful time for her and I when we both first knelt down as husband and wife and I stuttered and stammered through a prayer.
It was an eventful time for me to learn that all those times I had professed to hate Christ and the Bible, He had recorded in the very book I said I hated, that He loved me from the foundation of the world.
But is this
ETERNAL SALVATION ?
Far from it.
It was a salvation from the bondage of
false religion.
The same salvation Paul was referring to in that Scripture where he describes the Jews as having a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge, where he discusses the need for a preacher to be sent because how can one believe if nothing is heard ?
My people call it GOSPEL SALVATION, and rightly so.
This salvation frees you from the darkness of this world, into the light of this world: Christ.
It is this salvation that commands men to repent, to believe, to obey, BECAUSE THEIR ETERNITY HAS ALREADY BEEN SECURED BY CHRIST apart from any works of their own.
It is the same salvation Christ commanded His disciples to preach to all who have ears to hear, when He sent them out to the world, to teach what He taught, teachings which He heard and received from His Father.
But it is not eternal salvation.
For eternal salvation demands nothing from the yet unregenerate elect.
Not even memory.
For, if among the many things that you demand from a sinner to be eternally redeemed and saved, he must REMEMBER or have a conscious recollection of when he was saved, then you have just condemned more than a half of humanity that has ever existed
on earth and have confined the salvation and redemption of sinners by Christ within the boundaries of time.
By that I mean NO SOULS WERE SAVED UNTIL THE PREACHING OF THE GOSPEL began and belief began.
In addition, you are also pronouncing the eternal fate of those who were born, have been born, and will be born with mental challenges of all sorts, and those who will forget when they were "saved" because of these same mental challenges that may come by old age.
For isn't there a Scripture that says so ?
I quote 1 Corinthians 15:1,2 to you, sir:
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received , and wherein ye stand ;
By which also ye are saved , if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
DHK'2069707 said:
As a devout Catholic, I never heard the gospel presented in the Catholic Church.
The first time I did hear it was through a couple of students on the campus of a university working with an interdenominational Christian organization. They shared with me the gospel from the NT, as I have never heard it before. They made it personal. Yes, I knew the facts: that Christ died, was buried and rose again. But to make the application--it was for my sins that he paid the penalty; I was the sinner that needed to be saved, etc. After understanding the scriptures they explained, I prayed and trusted Christ as my Savior. I have never looked back since.
"He that has the Son has life; he that has not the Son of God has not life."
I know that I have the Son; I know I have life. It is that simple.
I don't have to look to Calvinism, election, the doctrines of grace, etc. I never heard of these things until I got to Bible College. It is Christ that saves.
Yes, and much more. The wages of sin is death. Death is separation, eternal separation from God. I was saved from being eternally separated from Christ.
I can handle that belief. But it is not important to the unsaved, or a new believer. It is meat and not milk. Like I mentioned, I never started studying such things until I got to Bible College, and I am glad that I didn't.
There is not much difference in that belief than in Catholicism, looking at it from one that is a new believer. One is born a Catholic and only if he remains a Catholic will he enter heaven.
Biblical salvation requires man to use his mind and make a choice. He must choose whether or not to receive him or reject him--as you once did in your own life.
Well, part of this section of your post kind of parallels my own experience. You most likely articulated it better.
All I know is I have never stopped believing in, or is it, on, Christ, even when I said I was Marxist/Leninist Atheist (and you may or may not believe I didn't think I was alone there).
Which is why when I heard that preacher present the Christ of the Bible, I said I want
THAT CHRIST. and I want that New Testament because that will tell me more of THAT CHRIST.
Biblical gospel salvation requires the REGENERATE MAN much.
But until he is regenerated, there is no demand whatsoever for any responsibility on his part because God knows he is incapable of doing anything that will please Him.
Actually, you are still closer to Roman Catholicism than you think.
Something for something.
Grace for indulgences, and vice-versa.
The cross, or the sword.
Roman Catholics think the Roman Catholic doctrines is for the good of all men.
You, even as a Christian, believe sincerely that the Bible, or the Scriptures, is addressed to ALL MANKIND.
It is NOT.
Paul STATED so, in Romans 15:4 and 1 Cor. 10:10-12.
Jehovah, in no uncertain terms, implied that His laws and His commands were for His people, ISRAEL, only, and only them, and not to the Hittites, not to the Jebusites, not to the Hivites, nor any of the surrounding tribes.
If He wanted them brought to Him, He would've sent Moses, or Joshua, to them.
Harder meat: God is an exclusive God.
He excludes from His grace and mercy those for whom these are not meant.