Economic Experts: Trump Should Win In Blowout In 2020

[Revmitchell]

According to some financial experts, President Trump should easily win the 2020 election because of one factor: the strength of the economy.

The experts quoted by Politico said that if history is a reliable guide, the fact that the economy has flourished during Trump’s tenure should be the overriding element in voter’s decision as to whom to vote for in 2020. The economy is sailing along on rising wages and low gas prices, as well as low unemployment. Donald Luskin, chief investment officer of TrendMacrolytics, which predicted Trump’s 2016 victory, opined, “The economy is just so damn strong right now and by all historic precedent the incumbent should run away with it.” He was sanguine about any problems with the economy that might arise between now and November 2020, adding, “It would have to slow a lot to still be not pretty good.”

Economic Experts: Trump Should Win In Blowout In 2020

 

[church mouse guy]

Trump is funny and he gets things done. The Dems do not have a candidate to run against him that is his equal in any aspect. They have a bunch of elderly whites in Sanders, Biden, Warren, and Clinton. And then their Speaker of the House is the elderly Pelosi who has AOC running circles around her.

 

[Yeshua1]

Trump is funny and he gets things done. The Dems do not have a candidate to run against him that is his equal in any aspect. They have a bunch of elderly whites in Sanders, Biden, Warren, and Clinton. And then their Speaker of the House is the elderly Pelosi who has AOC running circles around her.

They also have a bunch of liberals who would like to see Marxism come to America!

 

[HankD]

They also have a bunch of liberals who would like to see Marxism come to America!

Its already here.

 

[Yeshua1]

Its already here.

Yes, but not implemented as they would want it to be, as they seek us to become another Mother Russia!

 

[HankD]

Yes, but not implemented as they would want it to be, as they seek us to become another Mother Russia!

действительно товарищ

 

[InTheLight]

It's a long, long time in political time measurement to 2020. Something could happen right before the election to screw up the economy. Or has everyone forgotten 2008?

 

[HankD]

It's a long, long time in political time measurement to 2020. Something could happen right before the election to screw up the economy. Or has everyone forgotten 2008?

Hillary blamed Comey/Wikileaks late in the year for losing in 2016

Hillary Clinton blames Comey, Wikileaks for 2016 election loss

But then again she came up with at least a dozen more theories before the inauguration.

 

[InTheLight]

Hillary blamed Comey/Wikileaks late in the year for losing in 2016

Hillary Clinton blames Comey, Wikileaks for 2016 election loss

But then again she came up with at least a dozen more theories before the inauguration.

What does this have to do with the subject matter?

Oldie but goodie....

 

[HankD]

What does this have to do with the subject matter?

Just as after 2016 post election disaster, after all the hand wringing, weeping and wailing many theories will be brought forth by the Democrats as to why they lost BOTH the electoral AND popular vote.

 

[InTheLight]

Just as after 2016 post election disaster, after all the hand wringing, weeping and wailing many theories will be brought forth by the Democrats as to why they lost BOTH the electoral AND popular vote.

And what does this have to do with the favorable economic conditions that look good for Trump going into the 2020 election?

You know, the subject of the discussion in this thread.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL

 

[HankD]

And what does this have to do with the favorable economic conditions that look good for Trump going into the 2020 election?

You know, the subject of the discussion in this thread.

Nothing I was helping you to derail it.

 

[church mouse guy]

действительно товарищ

Easy for you to say!

 

[kyredneck]

Nothing I was helping you to derail it.

ROFGUFFAWING!!!

 

[kyredneck]

Something could happen right before the election to screw up the economy.

The Dems were overconfident last election, their eyes are full wide open now and their minds full of schemes. Trump's popularity numbers would be much higher if it weren't for the relentless bombardment of negative press. I believe he could lose even if the economy remains strong.

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

действительно товарищ

Always suspected you are an operative.

 

[Adonia]

According to some financial experts, President Trump should easily win the 2020 election because of one factor: the strength of the economy.

Plus the Democrats have gone full blown wacko left. Are the center to right American people going to vote for a "Beto" or a Sanders? I don't think so. The only way they win is if key states like Florida and the Midwest states somehow go for the Dems.

 

[Rockson]

The fun thing I'd like to watch is that if Trump won again how absoluely stunned and floored would be the more extreme Dems. I think they're convinced that OK Trump got in but if was just some sort of big mistake the American people made at the time maybe something akin to temporary insanity....that there was just something in the air that caused it. And then....he wins a second term!

I think as well that there's no indictment of Trump in the Russian investigation will be remembered....not that the President is perfect but all this long drawn out Russia thing has vexed most Americans and to see it was all unnecessary smacks of poor sour grape losers on the other side who wanted any reason to remove him from office. That alone will make people feel he deserves a second term.

 

[church mouse guy]

The Dems were overconfident last election, their eyes are full wide open now and their minds full of schemes. Trump's popularity numbers would be much higher if it weren't for the relentless bombardment of negative press. I believe he could lose even if the economy remains strong.

I see two groups to worry about, and maybe you can add others. One is young people who think that they would gain from socialism in spite of the evidence of history that everyone except the government bosses loses under socialism and hunger and famine follow close behind a socialist takeover. A second group is middle-class and upper-middle class white women in the suburbs who think that everyone should be nice--they are usually out of touch and offer no solutions for the serious problems facing the government.

The Dems are losing some black voters because they are happy with jobs and raises under Trump that they say Obama never helped them obtain. Also, a few Jews are leaving the Democrat Party but David Horowitz (Front Page Magazine) says that Reform Jews have no religion except the Democrat Party and they will not leave their religion. LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ probably don't mind the new Muslim dominance in the Democrat Party as they don't think that they will be thrown from the roofs of buildings in America and are so ignorant that they probably don't know that Muhammad said that all same-sex couples should be put to death. The Dems are advocating infanticide but that probably doesn't bother suburban white women, who mostly just watch the bank balance on their accounts in my opinion.

 

[HankD]

Always suspected you are an operative.

Yes, I was an operative for the United States of America.

I was an Intel and information EDP technician while in the Air Force on the BMEWS defense line 1961 - 1963.

Our motto "We watch the Russians Watching Us".

This phony baloney shock of Russian interference on the part of the Democrats is a farce.
Its been that way since WWII ended. They know that, - at least those with gray hair.