1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Ed's Catalogue of KJVO Doubles

Discussion in '2005 Archive' started by Ed Edwards, Mar 5, 2004.

Top Posters
Page 5 of 9
  1. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    Man, I hear it so much that I wish I could go away some place nice and never hear it again! I hear it in my sleep. I wonder what the average life expectancy of an 8th grade teacher is?

    Lacy
     
    #81 Lacy Evans, Apr 25, 2004
  2. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would never admit that such a bitter enemy of the KJVO movement made me fall out of my chair laughing. So just forget it OK?

    Lacy
     
    #82 Lacy Evans, Apr 25, 2004
  3. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    To bad that done look like
    Baptists gone a-dancin' :(

    Dance - n. fast circular argument
     
    #83 Ed Edwards, Apr 25, 2004
  4. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, I was just messing with you some. I hope you realize that I was joking. Probably about eight years exactly. haha You can call me stupid. You can call me dumb, but you sure can't call me smart. And that are da truth, the whole truth and nuthin' but the truth. :eek:
     
    #84 Phillip, Apr 25, 2004
  5. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't know, i'll check
    with my 8th grade teacher ... [​IMG]
     
    #85 Ed Edwards, Apr 25, 2004
  6. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm afraid spell-check has rendered your 8th grade teacher inept at spelling.

    Eye before he except after my?

    Lacy
     
    #86 Lacy Evans, Apr 26, 2004
  7. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Don't ask me. I was one of those guys who slept through the first through eight grades; then I woke up and realized I needed that stuff. :D
     
    #87 Phillip, Apr 26, 2004
  8. robycop3

    robycop3 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2000
    Messages:
    14,396
    Likes Received:
    672
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ya mean dere's more ta life than tackling a man who's got a football & is dressed dif'rent from me?
     
    #88 robycop3, Apr 27, 2004
  9. Phillip

    Phillip <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    6,708
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yes there is a lot more to life: Make SURE that if YOU happen to get a ball, that you run in the right direction. If you go the other way, you get beat up by the guys dressed like you! :D
     
    #89 Phillip, Apr 27, 2004
  10. Herr Magister J.T. Hatfield

    Herr Magister J.T. Hatfield New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here are a few, to keep the catalogue fed:

    For the Onlyist, any revision is anathema.

    But the title page of the 1611 (not the 1769) acknowledges its revision of prior versions!


    The KJV is the standard by which all other Bibles must be judged.

    But the KJV is based on the work done in other Bibles (Luther, Tyndale, Geneva)


    Onlyism claims the KJV is the result of Biblical Preservation.

    But it denies the same principle to Bibles coming before and after 1611. Not to mention: the revisions leading up to the 1769 (so much for preservation).

    Furthermore, there has yet to be an Onlyist who has the guts to point to any one single Bible predating 1611 that served as the repository of God's "Perfect Preserved Words" before the AV arrived on the scene, much less compare the KJV to this Bible to see if their particular parameters of Preservation (nice alliteration, eh?) passes the muster.

    jth

    Your friendly neighborhood reader of Reformation Bibles.
     
    #90 Herr Magister J.T. Hatfield, Apr 28, 2004
  11. Dr. Bob

    Dr. Bob Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    30,401
    Likes Received:
    555
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Welcome, jth, to our little dysfunctional corner of cyber-space.

    You did a commendable "first post" here, firing with a broad brush!

    Welcome. I spent some time in Delta Junction - is that far from you?
     
    #91 Dr. Bob, Apr 28, 2004
  12. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    #92 Ed Edwards, May 5, 2004
  13. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    900 - the languages

    ---0901 - Requiring English users to learn the original Hebrew (O.T.) and Greek (N.T.) is bad. Requiring non-English users to learn English so they can enjoy the AV1611 KJB (1769 edition) is good.
     
    #93 Ed Edwards, May 7, 2004
  14. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    ---018 - If the MV is found to be written at the Fifth Grade level of reading comprehemsion -- it has been DUMBED DOWN. If the KJV1769 is found to be written at the 5th Grade level of reading comprehension -- it is perfecter than ever!
     
    #94 Ed Edwards, May 7, 2004
  15. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    ---019 - Don't use facts.
    Facts confuse me.
    God is not the author of confusion.
    Dirty demonic confuser :(
     
    #95 Ed Edwards, May 20, 2004
  16. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Here's a few more I have observed (classify them as you will):

    1. The scholarship of the KJV translators far surpassed that of anyone who ever worked on a modern version. But when something the translators wrote in their preface or a footnote supports the reading of a MV, then their words are "merely man's opinion."

    2. Even though the sunburst design on the KJV's original title page is also a common motif on Mormon temples and other occult art, it gets a pass. But the Celtic "triquetra" knot on the spine of the NKJV is "satanic" because it is also a common Wiccan/occult symbol.

    3. The NIV is not to be trusted because of the involvement of Virginia Mollenkott on the translation committee. But Virginia Mollenkott herself is courted by KJV-onlyists as a reliable source of information about the translation of the NIV.
     
    #96 Ransom, May 20, 2004
  17. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you, Brother Ransom.


    Here is a direct quote from another
    thread here advocating apathy and
    ignorance, neither of which bear honor
    unto the Holy Written Word of God:
    The Holy Bible:

    "I don't care what the Latin Vulgate
    says, and I don't need to know what it says."

    I note that the Latin Vulgate contains
    the Holy Written Word of God and,
    if you knew Latin, could be your final authority.
     
    #97 Ed Edwards, May 21, 2004
  18. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    26,977
    Likes Received:
    2,537
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Unless of course it supports KJVOism such as the presence of 1 John 5:7 (not that I disagree that the Comma is authoritative but that it's another KJVO double-think).

    HankD
     
    #98 HankD, May 21, 2004
  19. Ransom

    Ransom Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    4,132
    Likes Received:
    1
    Unless of course it supports KJVOism such as the presence of 1 John 5:7

    And don't forget "lucifer" at Isa. 14:12.
     
    #99 Ransom, May 21, 2004
  20. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    ---719 - It is OK for a Bible to use "dynamic equivalence" as long as it's the KJV doing it.
     
    #100 Ed Edwards, May 23, 2004
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 5 of 9
Loading...