Emails Show Trump Jr. Knew Information May Have Come From Russian Government

[HankD]

You're kidding. Right?

Well it was a rhetorical question...

HankD

 

[InTheLight]

It would have been much longer with Hillary in office.

She always knew what she was doing, and it was always dishonest , sneaky and crooked.

Ah, yes, the "he's not Hillary" defense.

Right up there with Fake News and "look at this thing Obama did".

Sent from my Motorola Droid Turbo.

 

[carpro]

Ah, yes, the "he's not Hillary" defense.

It is what it is. She is the reason he was elected.

To not realize that is completely idiotic. To not be thankful she is not president is even worse.

Since you want someone who "knew what they were doing", you should have been on the Hillary bandwagon all the way. As it was you did everything you could to get her elected ...except vote for her.(I hope) Surely you're not that stupid.

 

[HankD]

Ah, yes, the "he's not Hillary" defense.

Right up there with Fake News and "look at this thing Obama did".

OK now here's how it works. PAY ATTENTION!

If it's bad mouth about President Trump it's fake news.
If it's bad mouth about President Obama it's Not Fake News.



HankD

 

[Reynolds]

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has concluded that the newly released emails between Donald Trump Jr. and publicist Rob Goldstone indicating the former’s enthusiasm to meet with Russian officials during the 2016 presidential campaign, is evidence of collusion. The New York Times first broke the controversial story, revealing that Trump Jr. met with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya during his dad’s campaign to supposedly get opposition research on Hillary Clinton.

Democrats Want Action After Trump Jr. Releases Emails

It's not collusion. The Obama administration, using State Department resources, colluded to unseat BB in the Israeli elections.where is the outrage?

 

[carpro]

It's not collusion. The Obama administration, using State Department resources, colluded to unseat BB in the Israeli elections.where is the outrage?

Simple really.

It's OK for democrats to collude with Russia of interfere in the election process of ours and other nation's elections.

It's illegal for Republicans.

 

[HankD]

It's not collusion. The Obama administration, using State Department resources, colluded to unseat BB in the Israeli elections.where is the outrage?

Same place where the 33,000 emails are hiding.

HankD

 

[InTheLight]

It is what it is. She is the reason he was elected.

To not realize that is completely idiotic. To not be thankful she is not president is even worse.

Since you want someone who "knew what they were doing", you should have been on the Hillary bandwagon all the way. As it was you did everything you could to get her elected ...except vote for her.(I hope) Surely you're not that stupid.

Given our history of posting here I'm pretty sure you know my answers to all of your so-called points.

I didn't vote for her.
I didn't do anything to help her get elected.
I'm thankful she's not president.

That said, it is not acceptable for Trump or anyone else to do dumb things, fail to advance their agenda, or do other questionable or negative things and then excuse these actions by saying, "Well, at least he's not Hillary." We're supposed to be better than that.

But I guess your philosophy of fighting dirty like the Democrats so your side can win, allows for your side to do the same things you complained about the Dems doing for the last eight years. In other words, the ends justify the means. That's what you get when your political morals are reduced to situational ethics (picking the lesser of two evils) and moral equivalence (well, at least he's not Hillary.)

 

[HankD]

Given our history of posting here I'm pretty sure you know my answers to all of your so-called points.

I didn't vote for her.
I didn't do anything to help her get elected.
I'm thankful she's not president.

That said, it is not acceptable for Trump or anyone else to do dumb things, fail to advance their agenda, or do other questionable or negative things and then excuse these actions by saying, "Well, at least he's not Hillary." We're supposed to be better than that.

But I guess your philosophy of fighting dirty like the Democrats so your side can win, allows for your side to do the same things you complained about the Dems doing for the last eight years. In other words, the ends justify the means. That's what you get when your political morals are reduced to situational ethics (picking the lesser of two evils) and moral equivalence (well, at least he's not Hillary.)

I very much support the statement "well, at least he's not Hillary".

With Neil Gorsuch there is now hope to overturn the shameful blot on American history - Baby Murder.

HankD

 

[carpro]

Given our history of posting here I'm pretty sure you know my answers to all of your so-called points.

I didn't vote for her.

I didn't think you were that stupid, but in my opinion, you did everything you could to get her elected except vote for her. Your denials make no difference at all.

The rest of your post was just garbage, so I won't respond at all to it.

 

[InTheLight]

I didn't think you were that stupid, but in my opinion, you did everything you could to get her elected except vote for her.

Well, yeah. Duh. I wanted her elected so badly that I didn't do the one thing in my power to see that it might happen! Makes total sense.

 

[Use of Time]

I didn't think you were that stupid, but in my opinion, you did everything you could to get her elected except vote for her. Your denials make no difference at all.

The rest of your post was just garbage, so I won't respond at all to it.

Carpro mad. Sky blue. Water wet.

 

[carpro]

Well, yeah. Duh. I wanted her elected so badly that I didn't do the one thing in my power to see that it might happen! Makes total sense.

I know your posting history. So does everyone else here. You slammed Trump at every opportunity and posted every negative article you could find. Hillary? Well...not so much.

 

[Calminian]

I know your posting history. So does everyone else here. You slammed Trump at every opportunity and posted every negative article you could find. Hillary? Well...not so much.

And he has a long history of defending Obama. It's very clear where he stands. I doubt anyone here is fooled. I don't understand the mentality, but it's a free country (especially with Trump in office).

And he did do everything he could to get Hillary elected, campaigning against her opponent virtually every day during election season.

 

[InTheLight]

And he has a long history of defending Obama. It's very clear where he stands. I doubt anyone here is fooled. I don't understand the mentality, but it's a free country (especially with Trump in office).

And he did do everything he could to get Hillary elected, campaigning against her opponent virtually every day during election season.

Caluminian lying about me again, I see.

I challenged you to find evidence of that long history you claim I have defending Obama and you came up empty. I would think my "long history" of defending Obama would provide you with countless posts you could link to proving your allegations. But no, just keep on lying.

 

[Calminian]

Caluminian lying about me again, I see.

I challenged you to find evidence of that long history you claim I have defending Obama and you came up empty. I would think my "long history" of defending Obama would provide you with countless posts you could link to proving your allegations. But no, just keep on lying.

This is really sad. You've made this challenge, I've answered this challenge over and over. Why do you keep up this charade?

 

[InTheLight]

This is really sad. You've made this challenge, I've answered this challenge over and over. Why do you keep up this charade?

How about a link to the post where you answered this challenge so that all can see it? If you've answered it over and over it should be easily done.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Calminian]

How about a link to the post where you answered this challenge so that all can see it? If you've answered it over and over it should be easily done.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

Why you know exactly where they are? We just had the conversation recently where I linked your defense of Obama after his victory. You promptly said it wasn't a defense (which is what you do every time a defense in pointed out).

 

[InTheLight]

Why you know exactly where they are? We just had the conversation recently where I linked your defense of Obama after his victory. You promptly said it wasn't a defense (which is what you do every time a defense in pointed out).

Yeah, but I want to see it again. Please post it again so everyone may see your proof.

 

[Calminian]

Yeah, but I want to see it again. Please post it again so everyone may see your proof.

Yes, that's what you said the last time. It's what you say every time. And everyone already knows where you stand.