Baptist in Richmond
Active Member
Perhaps you have forgotten the fact that Lay was at the helm.Originally posted by Bro. James Reed:
Lay is being made the patsy.
Do you really believe that Lay ascended to the top position at Enron despite being "oblivious to its goings on?"I don't believe he had anything to do with the Enron "stuff", other than being oblivious to its goings on.
The latter part?As CEO in the latter part of the company's days, he should have seen what was happening and had happened, but I don't believe he did.
Then he should be sent away for a VERY LONG TIME. Do you realize that insider trading is a violation of the Securities Act of 1933?If anything, he is guilty of mismanagement, insider trading, and maybe even trying to help cover it up, but I don't think he was involved in the "faked earnings" part of the scandal.
So, Ken Lay, despite having the company implode under him, had nothing to do with its demise?
That level of criminal activity cannot be perpetrated by just one man.Now, as for Jeff Skilling, that is another story. He's as guilty as sin.
You mention Clinton as if this somehow validates the potential pardon for Lay.BTW, if Lay is convicted, then yes, I believe that GW will do as Clinton did for his buddies and pardon him on his last day of office.
To quote Bruce Springsteen (again):
"God have mercy on the man who doubts what he's sure of."
Regards,
BiR