That is in the New Testament.
Of course Rom.10:13 is in the NT, as is Acts 10:43, and 1Cor.15:1-4, all of which clearly spell out the gospel message which is for both Jew and Gentile alike. Salvation is through Christ alone without works. Ask Jesus in John 14:6.
You are just quoting scripture here and pretending you are correcting me.
If it is the Scripture that corrects then praise the Lord!
You said Paul would not tell the Gentiles about the law the Jews had to do because they were not Jews and probably did not even now about Jews. I showed you from scripture that pagans even knew about Jews, and I even gave scripture saying that. Even if the Gentiles and pagans did not know about the Jews and the law, Paul would still explain how they were separate from the Covenant.
That is not what he did in Acts 17:11.
That is not what any of his sermons were about. Read the Book of Acts.
What disturbed the people when he preached? Whenever he mentioned the Gentiles, the Jews got angry. Whenever he mentioned the Resurrection, the Gentiles got upset. "Covenants" had nothing to do with his preaching. If it did, show it through Scripture.
Acts 17:3-4 Opening and alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom I preach unto you, is Christ. And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul and Silas; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, and of the chief women not a few.
--Here it was the resurrection that was the turning point. It was at this point also that persecution began as well.
Acts 17:19-20 And they took him, and brought him unto Areopagus, saying, May we know what this new doctrine, whereof thou speakest,
is? For thou bringest certain strange things to our ears: we would know therefore what these things mean.
Acts 17:32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear thee again of this
matter.
--Again, they heard him up to the resurrection, and then began to mock.
Acts 18:4 And he reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.
Acts 18:6 And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook
his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood
be upon your own heads; I
am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.
And Paul giving his testimony:
Acts 22:21-23 And he said unto me, Depart: for
I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles. And they gave him audience unto this word, and
then lifted up their voices, and said, Away with such a
fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live. And as they cried out, and cast off
their clothes, and threw dust into the air,
--He didn't preach covenants; he preached Christ.
Did you not just say, “Paul did not preach covenants”? Then you quote a scripture that says Christ is a stumbling block to the Jews.
And he was. The gospel was a stumbling block to the Jews. The Jews rejected Christ. That has nothing to do with covenants, but with the gospel, the Christ whom they rejected.
Matthew 26:28 This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
"This do in remembrance of me." That is not the Gospel. That is the beginning of the Lord's Supper. Where does this red herring come from?
What is absurd is you thinking the Gentiles had no idea about the Jews and the law.
Who taught the Gentiles about the Law. Who was their teacher. The Jews would not even enter their houses. It was against their (Rabbinical) law to come in contact with them. They were ignorant about Jewish law as they were ignorant about Christ.
I quoted scripture about Moses being preached in every city.
No, you perverted Scripture that you have no idea what it means, and then you expect others to believe your perversion of Scripture.
The Ethiopian was READING the book of Isaiah, and ASKED Philip who Isaiah was speaking about, and Philip explained to him the good news about Jesus.
So what? I can show you the gospel from the Book of Genesis. What does it matter what book I use, as long as the gospel is presented?
Faith in Jesus Christ was not REVEALED until Jesus came.
The protoevangelium, or "first gospel" is in Genesis 3:15. Someone once said:
In the OT Christ is concealed;
In the NT Christ is revealed.
But Christ is in all the Bible, OT and NT, nevertheless. There is nothing stopping one from believing in Christ from the OT.
[quote[That was in the New Testament, not the Old Testament.[/quote]
And your point is??
The churches of the NT are made up of both Jew and Gentile believers.
The Jews gave up their religions as the pagans gave up theirs.
The Lord said that they were things that had been known for ages, see Acts 15:17-18. You have no argument.
You have no argument because you refuse to come to an understanding of this verse. Of course many things have been known for ages, like:
There is a God; He created the world; He dwells in the heavens not made with hands; and many other things. The heavens declare the glory of God.
But that is not the point of Acts 15. They were instructions given to silence the Judaizers who were saying (like you) that works were necessary for the gospel to save. But it is only faith in Christ that saves. That message Paul was to take to the Gentiles and to condemn these Judaizers that had been following him. The matter had been settled now once and for all.
You have been taking this Scripture out of context because you don't understand it.
A Jew can still practice the Jewish customs. I gave you scripture telling you this.
No he cannot. There is one sacrifice. The sacrifices have stopped. The Jewish religion is over. It is wrong. Just as one cannot be a Muslim and a Christian at the same time; one cannot be a Jew and a Christian at the same time.
The Jews who did not believe in Jesus were cut off.
Just like the Muslims are today. All who do not believe in Jesus are "cut off." They will end up in the Lake of Fire.
The Word of God says there is a remnant of Jews that would be saved.
They WILL be saved. That has nothing to do with the first century or the present century, but only with the future.
Romans 11:5 So too, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace.
You can't pull a verse like that out of its context. The context is grace. Read verse 6.