LeBuick said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			Two questions, what is the reason for praying to Saints or Mary?
		
		
	 
 
The communion of the saints is not an innovation, but rather, a practice and belief that dates from apostolic times.  We believe that the Body of Christ, which is all of Christianity both present and past, is connected.  We are connected to Christians here on earth and in heaven, and we may choose to ask them to intercede for us in prayer.  Much as I ask my brothers and sisters in Christ who are present in church to pray for me (every single week!), I also may choose to ask those who are with the Lord to pray for me.  Before anyone goes down that path, we don't believe in praying to the "dead" since we certainly believe that Christians who have gone on to be with God are not dead, they are more alive than we could imagine here on earth and are much closer to God than us, thus, asking for their prayer cannot be a bad thing.  However, it is a misnomer and an intentional deception to suggest that petitions to saints are somehow above prayers to God, as they are not.  They are "additional" prayers.  Just as you might pray to God on your own, then ask a friend to pray for the same thing, we asks saints to pray for the same thing.  
 
The better question is, why do Fundamentalists deny the communion of saints?  It is a tenet of Christianity that was one of many things deleted when the name "Christian" was usurped.
 
	
	
		
		
			Is it true only the Priest has a Bible in service?
		
		
	 
 
No, it is not.  The laity (regular members of the congregation) read aloud Scripture at every single mass held anywhere in the world.  Not only that, but we read the same Scriptures so that we are all studying the same passages on the same day and in the course of 3 years, almost the entire Bible is read aloud in mass (services).  A layperson reads the Old Testament reading, then another leads us in singing the Psalms (as they were originally intended to be heard), then another layperson reads to us one of the Epistles of the New Testament, and then the priest or a deacon comes up to read the Gospel reading, which we reverence with respect by standing while it is read.  All of these Scripture readings are written down in the order that we read them in books called Missals, which many people in the congregation bring with them to read along, or of they so choose, a Bible to read along.  In our services, we procliam the Word of God as such and reverence it with an entire 1/2 of the mass.
 
The intentional deception that the Catholic Church somehow "censors" the faithful from owning or reading the Bible or discourages it in some way is patently false.  Anyone who teaches this is deliberately deceiving.  Some will bring up the history of burning Bibles, which to some extent is true, though exaggerated.  The burned Bibles were horrific, terrible translations which contained so many errors that they were not reliable as the Word of God.  They were replaced with much more reliable translations in Latin (a language that most people did read and speak back then) and later English when it became the more common language.  In either case, the idea that Catholics aren't supposed to read the Bible on their own is asinine and it is straight out of Boetner fairy-tale land.  I currently own about 9 or 10 Bibles of various versions for various purposes (e.g. bible study, devotion, portability).
 
Thank you for your questions.  Feel free to PM me or begin another thread about Catholic beliefs if I can be of assistance in clearing anything up.
 
God bless,
 
Michael