Equality Act

[Revmitchell]

What I'm saying is many proclaiming Christians call homosexuality a sin but never point out those who commit heterosexual sins like adultery. Churches are removed from the SBC for reaching out to homosexuals. Why aren't churches who protect adulterers removed from the convention? In my view this is a clear case of hypocrisy. Those people who commit that sin are not acceptable but our sins are OK.

Where are these churches that protect adulterers? Name them.

 

[Revmitchell]

So what we have here is an example of liberals who want to defend homosexuality but feel they cant so they create false dilemma's in order to bash those with whom they disagree with. Its delusional.

 

[Reynolds]

What I'm saying is many proclaiming Christians call homosexuality a sin but never point out those who commit heterosexual sins like adultery. Churches are removed from the SBC for reaching out to homosexuals. Why aren't churches who protect adulterers removed from the convention? In my view this is a clear case of hypocrisy. Those people who commit that sin are not acceptable but our sins are OK.

There is some of that going on in church. Adulterers are not trying to pass laws saying churches can't "discriminate" against them. They are not on a political crusade. Queers are on a crusade. We should push back on them twice as hard as they push.

 

[777]

No, he's going to push back on you.

So what we have here is an example of liberals who want to defend homosexuality but feel they cant so they create false dilemma's in order to bash those with whom they disagree with. Its delusional.

Yeah but it worked. Did for me at least, the argument that since some people commit adultery, this stupid bill letting guys overwhelm girls' sports just HAS to pass.

 

[Revmitchell]

No, he's going to push back on you.



Yeah but it worked. Did for me at least, the argument that since some people commit adultery, this stupid bill letting guys overwhelm girls' sports just HAS to pass.

I cant help you.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Adultery is a sin. Correct? It's no less a sin than homosexual sins. Why is it ignored?

There appears to be a dearth of imagination here, and that will be the death of America. It does not take much vision to see that all of the typical sins of relationship will be applied to all of these perversions as well. We are only in the infancy stage of this abomination. But charges of adultery, filing for divorce, battles over custody, etc., will become part and parcel of these newly legalized forms of "marriage." If allowed, this devils' farce will be played out on the national stage until the few remaining righteous will be glad when the enemy finally destroys what America will become.

 

[just-want-peace]

Adultery is a sin. Correct? It's no less a sin than homosexual sins. Why is it ignored?

One VERY obvious reason, assuming you are correct when you say it's IGNORED, is that adulterers are not pushing some agenda like your precious queers (bakers, photographers, etc) to try to force not only tolerance, but outright acceptance!!!!!
Also, adulterers are not pushing for special rights or protections while at the same time ADVERTISING their depravity publicly and "daring" anyone to confront their lifestyle.
I have no doubts that their Daddy loves their "grit"!!!!

 

[Wesley Briggman]

Why aren't churches who protect adulterers removed from the convention?

Firstly, adulterers have not formed cohesive, identifiable groups as queers/lesbians/sexually confused have. This fact precludes churches from reaching out to them if they were so inclined.

Secondly, hopefully you can not name a biblically sound church that knowingly embraces adulterous members.

My frustration is that many churches in this area do not confront the sin of promiscuous sexual behavior, including premarital intercourse, etc. (hopefully my "etc." will be considered as all-inclusive)

 

[FollowTheWay]

Firstly, adulterers have not formed cohesive, identifiable groups as queers/lesbians/sexually confused have. This fact precludes churches from reaching out to them if they were so inclined.

Secondly, hopefully you can not name a biblically sound church that knowingly embraces adulterous members.

My frustration is that many churches in this area do not confront the sin of promiscuous sexual behavior, including premarital intercourse, etc. (hopefully my "etc." will be considered as all-inclusive)

Your last sentence says what I am saying. Heterosexual sexual sin is somehow treated as not nearly as important as homosexual sexual sin. In fact one large, prestigious church in Atlanta blames the wife if her husband gets involved in adultery.

 

[church mouse guy]

Your last sentence says what I am saying. Heterosexual sexual sin is somehow treated as not nearly as important as homosexual sexual sin. In fact one large, prestigious church in Atlanta blames the wife if her husband gets involved in adultery.

Same-sex sex is considered unnatural in Scripture.

Romans 1:27 (KJV) And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

 

[OnlyaSinner]

Maybe I've just been fortunate that the churches I've attended since the early 1980s have not tolerated any sexual intimacy outside of a one-man/one-woman marriage. Whenever a church member(s) has been revealed to have engaged in such behavior, biblical church discipline has been practiced.