1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured ESV or NIV pew Bible change

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by thomas15, Feb 16, 2012.

  1. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    It matters very little. And in fact it is dangerous to believe that any version makes scripture so clear that no in depth study of culture, language, or context is necessary. Every Christian should always understand this is always necessary. All of this easy readability non sense is misleading and foolish.
     
  2. DaChaser1

    DaChaser1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't that though a main selling point of the NLT/NIV/HCSB etc ?
     
  3. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe it is but it is a flawed reasoning.
     
  4. DaChaser1

    DaChaser1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    0
    easier to read is nice, but wouldn't faithfulness to the greek/hebrew texts be more important selling feature?
     
  5. mandym

    mandym New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am no fan of Dynamic Translations. I see them as inferior and not worthy of placing the word "Bible" on them.

    The easy to read label is misleading as it sets up Christians to believe that a cursory reading of any passage in that translation is all that is needed to fully understand it. The logic used that leads one to create such translations discredits it anyway.
     
  6. DaChaser1

    DaChaser1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you view versions suich as Niv 2011 NLT HCSB as being "dynamic?"
     
  7. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    This makes little sense and completely ignores what dynamic equivalence actually seeks to accomplish.
     
  8. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    What do you mean by "more closely follow literally the greek text"?
     
  9. DaChaser1

    DaChaser1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    0
    The NASB seems to follow closest the Greek text for just the way they structured the english translated off that text...

    HCSB appears to be second closest to try to keep the greek structuring

    NOV 2011 seems to be "liberally" in just how the english sentence follow the order/structure of the greek text..

    NOT saying any of them are bad, just that think that due to their concept of "how" to translate off the texts, they adhere more/less lossely/strictly to preserving the Greek structure and order...

    the "wooden/literal" renderings of the NASB as contrasted to more of an equivalent rendering for the NIV....
     
  10. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    The NASU95 has done away with a lot of that.
     
  11. DaChaser1

    DaChaser1 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    0
    good!

    Still have and use the 1977 NAS Ryrie Bible...

    Think that IF one has been raised in either the KJV/NKJV, or else "used" to a more formal style, that either version of NASB actually esier to read and study with then the NIV....

    As find thatat times while using the NIV just seems to "read different"
     
Loading...