"Again with free will, I think Christ's love is shown in that he would let us give up our salvation if that's what we actively chose. I've heard univeralists say to me, because I don't believe *all* men will come to salvation, "Doesn't Christ love them enough?". That's basically the same thing I hear you saying, and my response is the same: forcing someone to be with you against their will is not love. Why didn't God "love" us enough to make us robots instead of humans in the first place? Because he loved us more than enough - he gave us free will."
The doctrine of the "free will" is based on legalism. It is the belief that man has the ability to choose to keep the written commandments of God, through his own willpower. However, such doctrine is not true, and is actually the exact opposite of what the Bible teaches.
Paul, referring to himself of the time he was an unsaved Jew living under the law, reveals that such men do not have a "free" will:
"For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to WILL is present with me: but how to perform that which is good I FIND NOT" - Romans 7:18
Some mistakenly think that Paul is referring to himself in his present, saved condition, in that passage of verses. But he is not. Paul is referring to himself to the time he was an unsaved Jew living under the law, and he begins the transition back to that time, beginning in verse 7 of that chapter, Romans 7:7, and continues referring to that time until the 25th verse of that chapter, the last verse.
This passage has been mistaught by many, and misunderstood by many.
And, when a person become saved, one still does not have a total "free will," but rather his/her will is now controlled by the Holy Spirit:
"For it is God who worketh in you both to WILL and to DO of his good pleasure." - Philippians 2:13
If the natural, sinful man had a total free will to choose to obey God's written commandments or not, then he would be neither good nor bad, but rather
neutral. He would also not be in need of the new birth, as there would be no need of regeneration and the cleansing of his heart, and the empowerment to do righteousness by the birth of the Holy Spirit.
Man has a
limited free will. And at one time man had the total free will to choose not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good an evil, or to eat from the tree of life (salvation, eternal life). But after the fall of man, man no longer had the "free will" to choose the new salvation on his own strength, as the spirit of sin is stronger than the sinner's will; as revealed in Romans 7:14, as previously cited.
This is why no man can come unto Christ unless the Father draw him. For man can now only accept salvation when the Holy Spirit temporarily binds the spirit of sin within the sinner, and frees him for the opportunity to call out to Christ for salvation. However, should the sinner refuse the call, then the Holy Spirit allows the sinner to go back into the bondage of the spirit of sin.
All of the righteous deeds of the saved are not the result of the saved's "free will," but rather the result of the will and empowerment of the Holy Spirit within the hearts of the saved. The erroneous doctrine of the "free will" is the creation of the natural mind, not the revelations of the Holy Spirit.
God bless.